User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » No more wiretapping without a warrant Page [1] 2 3 4, Next  
ParksNrec
All American
8742 Posts
user info
edit post

finally.

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nationworld/bal-spying0817,0,1116523.story?coll=bal-nationworld-headlines

Quote :
" DETROIT // A federal judge ruled today that the government's warrantless wiretapping program is unconstitutional and ordered an immediate halt to it.

U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor in Detroit became the first judge to strike down the National Security Agency's program, which she says violates the rights to free speech and privacy.

Advertisement
Click here to find out more!
The American Civil Liberties Union filed the lawsuit on behalf of journalists, scholars and lawyers who say the program has made it difficult for them to do their jobs. They believe many of their overseas contacts are likely targets of the program, which involves secretly taping conversations between people in the U.S. and people in other countries.

The government argued that the program is well within the president's authority, but said proving that would require revealing state secrets.

The ACLU said the state-secrets argument was irrelevant because the Bush administration already had publicly revealed enough information about the program for Taylor to rule.

More details to follow. "

8/17/2006 12:37:57 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148439 Posts
user info
edit post

hope we dont get hit with another terrorist attack because we couldnt get a warrant in time to hear the terrorists discussing the plot

8/17/2006 12:39:25 PM

Randy
Suspended
1175 Posts
user info
edit post

hope we dont get hit with another terrorist attack because we couldnt get a warrant in time to hear the terrorists discussing the plot

8/17/2006 12:39:48 PM

smcrawff
Suspended
1371 Posts
user info
edit post

I say we throw out freedom until the terrorist threat is gone.

8/17/2006 12:40:13 PM

Randy
Suspended
1175 Posts
user info
edit post

i say we throw out liberals who think that these programs have made things more dangerous

8/17/2006 12:41:39 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148439 Posts
user info
edit post

i say we all get over inflated egos and think the govt gives a shit about what we might be talking about

8/17/2006 12:42:05 PM

smcrawff
Suspended
1371 Posts
user info
edit post

The constitution only applies when I want it to

8/17/2006 12:43:06 PM

sober46an3
All American
47925 Posts
user info
edit post

i say we lock our doors because our over inflated egos think that cops are just going to come into our house.

8/17/2006 12:43:11 PM

ParksNrec
All American
8742 Posts
user info
edit post

I saw we throw out all idiots who think it is ok to circumvent the law and throw away freedom in the name of safety.

8/17/2006 12:43:22 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148439 Posts
user info
edit post

i value freedom and rights

like the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness

i think that life freedom is kinda important

cant really do much without life now can you

maybe you think the right to have a private conversation on a phone system that you don't own is more important than the right to life

8/17/2006 12:43:38 PM

Randy
Suspended
1175 Posts
user info
edit post

well, the democrats are the party of death

8/17/2006 12:45:39 PM

ParksNrec
All American
8742 Posts
user info
edit post

life without liberty isn't worth having.

8/17/2006 12:45:41 PM

smcrawff
Suspended
1371 Posts
user info
edit post

I carry a gun because my overinflated ego tells me that every criminal gives a fuck about me

8/17/2006 12:45:43 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148439 Posts
user info
edit post

i want to ban guns because bad things only happen to other people, never to me

^^kill yourself then

8/17/2006 12:46:21 PM

sober46an3
All American
47925 Posts
user info
edit post

i say we outlaw guns, since they can possibly take away a life.

8/17/2006 12:46:31 PM

smcrawff
Suspended
1371 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."


GOD DAMN HIPPIES

8/17/2006 12:46:59 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148439 Posts
user info
edit post

i like how you get pwnt in this thread and have to bring up stuff about guns and locking doors to try and make yourselves feel better

^I DONT THINK THE FOUNDING FATHERS HAD handguns TELEPHONES IN MIND WHEN THEY WROTE THE CONSTITUTION

[Edited on August 17, 2006 at 12:47 PM. Reason : .]

8/17/2006 12:47:02 PM

sober46an3
All American
47925 Posts
user info
edit post

The constitution only applies when I want it to

8/17/2006 12:48:19 PM

ParksNrec
All American
8742 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"^^kill yourself then"


I don't need to because I live in a free country, and this judge just upheld my freedom.

8/17/2006 12:48:43 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148439 Posts
user info
edit post

I VALUE PRIVATE PHONE CALLS ON A PHONE NETWORK I DONT OWN MORE THAN I VALUE THE RIGHT TO LIFE

^good thing its a free country...for some reason some liberals were trying to tell me that all our freedoms had been taken away

8/17/2006 12:49:09 PM

smcrawff
Suspended
1371 Posts
user info
edit post

JUDGES WHO DON'T AGREE WITH ONLY LIKING THE AMENDMENTS I LIKE ARE ACTIVIST JUDGES

8/17/2006 12:49:19 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148439 Posts
user info
edit post

maybe you think the right to have a private conversation on a phone system that you don't own is more important than the right to life

8/17/2006 12:50:11 PM

smcrawff
Suspended
1371 Posts
user info
edit post

CLEARLY THATS WHAT I THINK

8/17/2006 12:51:56 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148439 Posts
user info
edit post

apparently its more important to you

ps the govt is going to wiretap calls without warrants anyway because they are masonic devils and do whatever they want anyway

[Edited on August 17, 2006 at 12:52 PM. Reason : .]

8/17/2006 12:52:11 PM

sober46an3
All American
47925 Posts
user info
edit post

8/17/2006 12:52:53 PM

ParksNrec
All American
8742 Posts
user info
edit post

maybe I think that life and liberty go hand in hand, one without the other is useless, so to debate putting one over the other is also useless.

but you can post that line a few more times if you please.

8/17/2006 12:53:27 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148439 Posts
user info
edit post

i post pictures when i cant think of any words to use

^well we agree that liberty is useless without life

Quote :
"so to debate putting one over the other is also useless."


NO IM PRETTY SURE MOST PEOPLE WOULD PUT LIFE OVER MOST OTHER THINGS

8/17/2006 12:53:34 PM

sober46an3
All American
47925 Posts
user info
edit post

a picture is worth a thousand words.

8/17/2006 12:54:10 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148439 Posts
user info
edit post

do you only read books with lots of pictures?

some would call those childrens books

8/17/2006 12:55:31 PM

jbtilley
All American
12797 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"life without liberty isn't worth having"


I suppose if it came down to someone listening in on my phone conversation and dying I'd probably side with the phone thing 9 out of 10 times

8/17/2006 12:57:05 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148439 Posts
user info
edit post

^look...someone else with COMMON SENSE

8/17/2006 12:58:36 PM

PinkandBlack
Suspended
10517 Posts
user info
edit post

you know...you would think someone that smokes as many trees as you claim to would be wanting to avoid the feds and spy programs at all costs.

8/17/2006 12:59:24 PM

smcrawff
Suspended
1371 Posts
user info
edit post

So would you also be ok with willingly disarming yourself, submitting to a national id, allowing cops to search you anytime they want, etc...
Where do you draw the line?

8/17/2006 12:59:55 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148439 Posts
user info
edit post

i dont smoke so your argument is null and void

8/17/2006 12:59:56 PM

PinkandBlack
Suspended
10517 Posts
user info
edit post

http://thewolfweb.com/photo_folder.aspx?user=2774&folder=Chron&filter=

8/17/2006 1:01:07 PM

smcrawff
Suspended
1371 Posts
user info
edit post

I SMOKE TREES

8/17/2006 1:01:07 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148439 Posts
user info
edit post

whoops havent updated my profile since i was in college 4 years ago

[Edited on August 17, 2006 at 1:02 PM. Reason : 4 years ago]

8/17/2006 1:01:35 PM

ParksNrec
All American
8742 Posts
user info
edit post

I fail to see how it is common sense for the government to have such disregard for the law in respect to personal privacy. Of course if I was given the black and white choice of dying or having my phone conversations recorded, I would choose life, but we live in a free fucking country, we can have both.

8/17/2006 1:02:53 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148439 Posts
user info
edit post

its common sense to value life more than anything else

its kind of an important thing that all living things / survivalists have to do to...survive and live

8/17/2006 1:04:06 PM

smcrawff
Suspended
1371 Posts
user info
edit post

CLEARLY THIS RULING IS GOING TO KILL PEOPLE

8/17/2006 1:06:17 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148439 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"hope we dont get hit with another terrorist attack because we couldnt get a warrant in time to hear the terrorists discussing the plot"


do you hope we DO get hit with another terrorist attack because we couldnt get a warrant in time?

8/17/2006 1:06:59 PM

sober46an3
All American
47925 Posts
user info
edit post

STRAWMAN

8/17/2006 1:08:55 PM

smcrawff
Suspended
1371 Posts
user info
edit post

YES I DEFINITELY HOPE AMERICANS GET KILLED

8/17/2006 1:09:27 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148439 Posts
user info
edit post

^^what did you say hippie? i couldnt hear you over the blaring jam band music

^thats what i figured

[Edited on August 17, 2006 at 1:10 PM. Reason : .]

8/17/2006 1:09:58 PM

ParksNrec
All American
8742 Posts
user info
edit post

do you hope the government takes away all your belongings and places you in a super-secure bomb-bunker where you won't die of anything other than natural causes?


look, I can make silly hypotheticals too.

8/17/2006 1:10:20 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148439 Posts
user info
edit post

terrorism on US soil is hypothetical

8/17/2006 1:11:19 PM

ParksNrec
All American
8742 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Main Entry: hy·po·thet·i·cal
Pronunciation: "hI-p&-'the-ti-k&l
Function: adjective
: being or involving a hypothesis : CONJECTURAL <hypothetical arguments> <a hypothetical situation> "


Quote :
"Main Entry: hy·poth·e·sis
Pronunciation: hI-'pä-th&-s&s
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural hy·poth·e·ses /-"sEz/
Etymology: Greek, from hypotithenai to put under, suppose, from hypo- + tithenai to put -- more at DO
1 a : an assumption or concession made for the sake of argument"



unless you are some sort of psychic, it certainly is hypothetical.

8/17/2006 1:13:38 PM

jbtilley
All American
12797 Posts
user info
edit post

^Look I don't agree with wiretapping but that implication is just silly. Why don't we just do away with the military entirely because the threat of an invading force is pure hypothesis.

8/17/2006 1:20:01 PM

pryderi
Suspended
26647 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"I don't email, however. And there's a reason. I don't want you reading my personal stuff. There has got to be a certain sense of privacy. "

-Bush

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/04/20050414-4.html

8/17/2006 1:20:17 PM

ParksNrec
All American
8742 Posts
user info
edit post

^^ it was merely in response to his implication that doing away with wiretapping would ensure more terrorist attacks on US soil. I responded with an equally silly hypothetical, and lowered his statement to include all terrorist attacks.

I am not in any way saying terrorism is not a threat.


I mean, I definitely say it is hypothetical to say that there will be more terrorist attacks due to warrants not being able to be served in time. That was the actual argument there.

[Edited on August 17, 2006 at 1:27 PM. Reason : ]

8/17/2006 1:25:56 PM

 Message Boards » The Soap Box » No more wiretapping without a warrant Page [1] 2 3 4, Next  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.39 - our disclaimer.