well now you know how everyone else feels when you post

gg

Quote :

"nobody said rally was wrong about the defenses. it's just funny that he talks stats after bashing me for bringing stats into the vick picture originally"

ding ding

[Edited on December 14, 2005 at 12:08 PM. Reason : *]

12/14/2005 12:07:48 PM

They're so cute when they're ignorant.

12/14/2005 12:10:11 PM

Quote :

"well now you know how everyone else feels when you post"

12/14/2005 12:11:03 PM

Pad.

12/14/2005 12:11:26 PM

im gonna bttt the other vick thread at the end of the season and post some more quality stats for you guys, just so you know

12/14/2005 5:15:17 PM

You mean the kind of stats that you used last season to prove that the Steelers were going to beat the Patriots in the playoffs?

You've already proved that your stats and opinions amount to little more than shit.

Also, way to back out of the bet you made. Classy stuff.

12/14/2005 5:20:17 PM

god you guys are so damn annoying.

I even capitalized 'STATISTICALLY' so that you'd see I was referring to STATISTICS and not actual value...

where the fuck was I using statistics to prove my point.

You guys are fucking morons...

12/14/2005 5:20:59 PM

That's a bit harsh. I mean, he DID almost hit 50% of his NFL picks.

12/14/2005 5:21:58 PM

if it were a fair bet i'd still be in

12/14/2005 5:24:00 PM

How is it not fair? You made the rules and I followed them. You mean you can't beat me when you make up the rules? You'd have to be pretty fuckin' stupid not to be able to beat someone when you're playing by rules that you made up.

12/14/2005 5:25:21 PM

VICK IS GOD

12/18/2005 10:43:52 PM

dont even start....

Every QB puts up bad stats against the Bears.

He cant help that his o-line cant block anyone.

He's getting drilled on three step drops.


He still looks a lot better than DelHomme did against the Bears

12/18/2005 10:44:57 PM

Roethlisberger had a 108 efficiency rating against the Bears.

He has a better line than Vick, though.

12/18/2005 10:46:31 PM

hey, i've always said delhomme sucks

12/18/2005 10:46:34 PM

^^ and it was at Pittsburgh


and they didnt play like total dogshit.

12/18/2005 10:47:25 PM

Quote :

"He still looks a lot better than DelHomme did against the Bears "

14 yards passing and a pick is better than the 200+ yards that Delhomme threw for?

12/18/2005 10:47:56 PM

delhomme single handedly gave the bears 14 points

VICK RULZ

12/18/2005 10:50:08 PM

14 points?

WTF?

...

???


COME AGAIN?

?

[Edited on December 18, 2005 at 10:52 PM. Reason : did he feel he was too generous and take one back?]

12/18/2005 10:51:20 PM

i meant 10 K!?!?!@



and yes, he did with his shit ass interceptions

where they started on like the 5 yard line both times



[Edited on December 18, 2005 at 10:54 PM. Reason : .]

12/18/2005 10:52:21 PM

I guess it's possible that Vick is less of a negative than Delhomme was 3 weeks ago at Soldier Field. But I'm having trouble understanding how he could be doing "better" than anybody with 14 yards passing and an interception.

12/18/2005 10:54:21 PM

Quote :

"14 yards passing and a pick is better than the 200+ yards that Delhomme threw for?"

Yes.

12/18/2005 10:54:30 PM

k

thanks for clarifying

12/18/2005 10:55:10 PM

anyone got a problem with that 60 yard drive he just engineered?

Didnt think so...

It's not his fault that his o-line and WR's completely suck nuts out there.

12/18/2005 11:05:15 PM

He still can't throw for shit. He tosses the ball around like a middle school quarterback. How many years do you have to be in the league to learn to step into the ball or you're going to keep underthrowing balls and having them intercepted when your wide receiver has his defender beat by 5 feet??

Vick sucks. Rex Grossman is beasting him tonight.

12/18/2005 11:26:14 PM