User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » Hillary 2016 Page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 ... 31, Prev Next  
moron
All American
29988 Posts
user info
edit post

http://www.cc.com/video-clips/pbvhfh/the-nightly-show-with-larry-wilmore-hillary-clinton-s-black-lives-matter-meeting?utm=share_twitter

8/19/2015 11:02:20 AM

eyewall41
All American
1984 Posts
user info
edit post

Whether the e-mail scandal holds any water or not Hillary's numbers are dropping in part as a result of it. Bernie is gaining ground.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/19/politics/2016-poll-hillary-clinton-joe-biden-bernie-sanders/index.html
http://www.wcax.com/story/29807654/sanders-gains-ground-in-national-poll

8/19/2015 12:19:47 PM

dtownral
All American
19579 Posts
user info
edit post

Bernie doesn't have to beat Clinton, he has to beat the media which has a vested interest in protecting everything he is against

8/19/2015 12:21:12 PM

eyewall41
All American
1984 Posts
user info
edit post

^That is absolutely true and they are certainly searching for a way to take him down. He knows they are looking for any small opening.

[Edited on August 19, 2015 at 1:29 PM. Reason : .]

8/19/2015 1:28:38 PM

eyewall41
All American
1984 Posts
user info
edit post

Hillary's largest donor, Citigroup, did alright for themselves. On Wall St., fraud always pays:
http://ringoffireradio.com/2015/08/fraud-paid-off-big-for-citigroup-makes-3-billion-pays-180-million-fine/

8/20/2015 3:59:53 PM

beatsunc
All American
8716 Posts
user info
edit post

guys, she said she is sorry about hiding all the emails about trading cash for state dept favors. glad we can put it behind us now

also, if her IT guys pleads the fiff on TV that would not look good me thinks

Quote :
"As lawmakers in the Congress returned to work on Tuesday, Republicans made clear they want answers from a former State Department employee who was paid on the side by Hillary Clinton for maintenance work on her controversial outside email server while Secretary of State.

Two key GOP Senators basically offered ex-aide Bryan Pagliano immunity in exchange for his testimony to a pair of Senate panels about his work on the Clinton email server.

Up to this point, Pagliano has made clear he will take the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering questions.

“Your right under the Fifth Amendment to avoid being compelled to provide testimony that might be used to prosecute you is a fundamental individual right,” wrote Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA) and Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI).

“With that being said, the Committees also need the unique information you likely have in order to exercise their oversight functions under the Constitution,” the Senators added.

The questions came as Hillary Clinton herself shifted strategy on the email issue, which has dogged her campaign for weeks.


WASHINGTON (AP) — It took three interviews and five days for Hillary Rodham Clinton to say “I’m sorry.”

After resisting apologizing for using a personal email account run on a private server to conduct government business as secretary of state, Clinton shifted course Tuesday.

“That was a mistake,” she said of her email practice. “I’m sorry about that. I take responsibility,” the front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination said in an interview with ABC News.

Clinton will testify in late October before a House panel that has been looking in to both the Benghazi attacks in 2012 and the issues about her outside email server while Secretary of State.

"

9/9/2015 7:15:21 AM

eyewall41
All American
1984 Posts
user info
edit post

Bernie Sanders is now even with Hillary in Iowa:
http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/10/politics/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-iowa-poll/index.html

9/10/2015 9:07:14 AM

beatsunc
All American
8716 Posts
user info
edit post


Quote :
"Kathleen Willey, the former Democrat activist who claims she was sexually assaulted by President Bill Clinton, is calling out Hillary Clinton for a new ad that expresses the presidential candidate’s purported concern for the survivors of sexual assault.

“She’s a money-hungry hypocritical witch who will do anything for money,” Willey told the American Mirror.

In the ad, which is only about 17 seconds long, Hillary Clinton states: “I want to send a message to every survivor of sexual assault. Don’t let anyone silence your voice. You have a right to be heard, and you have a right to be believed. We’re with you.”

Willey pointed out she got a different message from Hillary when she accused Bill Clinton of sexually assaulting her.

“She believed what happened for sure. She just chose to ignore the plight of all of his victims, thus enabling him to continue to abuse and rape women in the future,” Willey said of Hillary.



“She’s a lying pig. I cannot believe that she had the gall to make that commercial. How dare she? I hope she rots in hell.”
"

9/16/2015 4:01:56 PM

TreeTwista10
Jimmy Mack
135993 Posts
user info
edit post

even the feminist democrats i know are for sanders over hillary

9/16/2015 4:09:59 PM

Shrike
All American
8989 Posts
user info
edit post

9/19/2015 1:22:15 PM

0EPII1
All American
39461 Posts
user info
edit post

^^^

did he ever "abuse" or "rape" any of his 'victims', or was it always consensual? the only victim was his wife, but she chose to ignore his transgressions, and even had some of his conquests followed by private detectives and/or silenced, so she did not see herself as a victim. in reality, i am sure she did, which woman wouldn't? she just hung around and tolerated it for her political ambitions.

so did he abuse/rape?

9/20/2015 9:21:21 PM

beatsunc
All American
8716 Posts
user info
edit post

^all signs point to yes

9/21/2015 6:43:30 AM

dtownral
All American
19579 Posts
user info
edit post

Is Clinton the only person to be involved in both a -gate and -ghazi "scandals"?



[Edited on October 12, 2015 at 10:56 AM. Reason : I guess maybe Tom Brady since it is called both deflategate and ballghazi]

10/12/2015 10:51:19 AM

Shrike
All American
8989 Posts
user info
edit post

http://www.salon.com/2015/10/15/gops_benghazi_truth_serum_another_republican_congressman_admits_its_all_about_taking_down_hillary_clinton/

Quote :
"“Kevin McCarthy basically blew himself up with that comment over the Benghazi committee,” Hanna said before acknowledging that “sometimes the biggest sin you can commit in D.C. is to tell the truth.”"


Quote :
"“This may not be politically correct, but I think that there was a big part of this investigation that was designed to go after people and an individual, Hillary Clinton,” Hanna admitted before quickly claiming that “there’s also a lot of it that’s important.”"


When are people going to start getting upset about the GOP wasting millions of tax payer dollars on bullshit investigations and lawsuits for political gain?

10/15/2015 12:07:47 PM

Smath74
All American
93026 Posts
user info
edit post

the argument that so many liberals mock conservatives for... "they want to take our guns"

well, looks like Hillary DOES want to via MANDATORY gun buy back programs...
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/10/17/clinton-suggests-shed-consider-mandatory-gun-buy-backs-sparking-fears/?intcmp=hpbt2

10/17/2015 8:48:46 PM

aimorris
All American
14644 Posts
user info
edit post

10/17/2015 9:21:29 PM

Kurtis636
All American
14984 Posts
user info
edit post

She's one of the worst people in the world. I really have no idea how anyone could consider her a good candidate for president. She's pretty much a female Richard Nixon minus the charm.

10/18/2015 2:45:03 AM

JCE2011
All American
5195 Posts
user info
edit post

I know the liberals were bragging about who has the worst grade with the NRA... but at what point are they going too far to other anti-gun-nuts?

[Edited on October 19, 2015 at 2:24 PM. Reason : .]

10/19/2015 2:24:28 PM

dtownral
All American
19579 Posts
user info
edit post

but her response is obviously describing voluntary programs:
Quote :
"VOTER: Back to handguns. Recently, Australia managed to get away, or take away tens of thousands, millions of handguns. In one year, they were all gone. Can we do that? If we can’t, why can’t we?

HILLARY CLINTON: Australia is a good example, Canada is a good example, the U.K. is a good example. Why? Each of them have had mass killings. Australia had a huge mass killing about 20-25 years ago, Canada did as well, so did the U.K. In reaction, they passed much stricter gun laws.

In the Australian example, as I recall, that was a buyback program. The Australian government, as part of trying to clamp down on the availability of automatic weapons, offered a good price for buying hundreds of thousands of guns. Then, they basically clamped down, going forward, in terms of having more of a background check approach, more of a permitting approach, but they believe, and I think the evidence supports them, that by offering to buyback those guns, they were able to curtail the supply and set a different standard for gun purchases in the future.

Communities have done that in our country, several communities have done gun buyback programs. I think it would be worth considering doing it on the national level, if that could be arranged. After the terrible 2008 financial crisis, one of the programs that President Obama was able to get in place was Cash for Clunkers. You remember that? It was partially a way to get people to buy new cars because we wanted more economic activity, and to get old models that were polluting too much, off the roads. So I think that’s worth considering. I do not know enough detail to tell you how we would do it, or how would it work, but certainly your example is worth looking at. [Applause]"

http://freebeacon.com/issues/clinton-australian-style-gun-control-worth-considering-for-u-s/

[Edited on October 19, 2015 at 2:30 PM. Reason : lio=nk]

10/19/2015 2:29:52 PM

moron
All American
29988 Posts
user info
edit post

^ Clinton's statement and the Fox News article are wildly different characterizations.

I don't think guy buybacks would work in America, and this is probably what we'd find out after they were "looked into". But this doesn't mean it's not "worth looking into".

10/19/2015 7:04:26 PM

synapse
play so hard
52658 Posts
user info
edit post

I'm pretty far from being a Hillary fan, but I think she's growing on me:

10/23/2015 2:19:57 PM

synapse
play so hard
52658 Posts
user info
edit post



10/23/2015 7:14:01 PM

eyewall41
All American
1984 Posts
user info
edit post

Liz Warren has refused to endorse her:
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/elizabeth-warren-female-democratic-senator-missing-hillary-clinton/story?id=35500686

12/1/2015 9:39:45 AM

Pupils DiL8t
All American
3642 Posts
user info
edit post

My guess is that Elizabeth Warren will individually endorse Hillary Clinton either later in the primary or after the primary.

12/1/2015 11:08:42 AM

beatsunc
All American
8716 Posts
user info
edit post

https://youtu.be/FECIYlo3KRY
It Feels Good to Be a Clinton

office space parody

[Edited on February 12, 2016 at 6:00 PM. Reason : rt]

2/12/2016 5:59:49 PM

beatsunc
All American
8716 Posts
user info
edit post

she may literally have brain damage
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2268073/Hillary-Clinton-Does-Secretary-State-double-vision-blood-clot-scare.html

Hillary Clinton's glasses appeared to have a Fresnel prism on the lens when she appeared before the Senate this week

The stick-on prisms are used to assist people experiencing double vision

Doctors discovered a blood clot close to Clinton's brain after she suffered a fall and concussion last month

2/18/2016 12:27:13 PM

dtownral
All American
19579 Posts
user info
edit post

2/18/2016 12:37:32 PM

JCE2011
All American
5195 Posts
user info
edit post

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dY77j6uBHI

2/19/2016 5:01:47 PM

dtownral
All American
19579 Posts
user info
edit post

some of these latest emails seem pretty damning, if clinton wins the nomination i don't see how she runs from this in the general

2/28/2016 11:42:22 AM

dtownral
All American
19579 Posts
user info
edit post

doesn't an email like this:
https://foia.state.gov/searchapp/DOCUMENTS/HRC_Email_1_296/HRCH2/DOC_0C05739578/C05739578.pdf

or this:
https://foia.state.gov/searchapp/DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_Feb26thWeb/O-2015-08641FEB26/DOC_0C05795583/C05795583.pdf

directly contradict clinton's statements?

[Edited on February 28, 2016 at 4:52 PM. Reason : .]

2/28/2016 4:50:54 PM

beatsunc
All American
8716 Posts
user info
edit post

^crazy thing is no one seems to care

2/28/2016 6:05:18 PM

NyM410
J-E-T-S
46858 Posts
user info
edit post

It's stale. No one cares because of all the shit that hasn't stuck over three damn decades.

I do agree that some of that is pretty damning though.

Perhaps this will be a lesson much like the boy who cried wolf.

2/28/2016 9:54:01 PM

dtownral
All American
19579 Posts
user info
edit post



ouch

3/1/2016 8:05:16 AM

bbehe
#TeamGyro
16596 Posts
user info
edit post

How is that not grounds for being charged? If I mishandled classified docs in such a way, I'd have been stripped of a security clearance (before trial), charges, and found guilty within the span of a month

3/1/2016 8:38:56 AM

dtownral
All American
19579 Posts
user info
edit post

this is how donald trump gets elected

3/1/2016 8:57:03 AM

The E Man
Suspended
15268 Posts
user info
edit post

hillary has a nice movement and all but it seems to be regional. Can she do well outside of the south or actually win a blue state?

3/1/2016 8:07:36 PM

JCE2011
All American
5195 Posts
user info
edit post

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kypl1MYuKDY

3/2/2016 3:33:33 PM

HCH
All American
3022 Posts
user info
edit post

Just as a reminder for anyone who actually still supports Hill.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/03/tracking-the-clinton-controversies-from-whitewater-to-benghazi/396182/

3/3/2016 3:03:58 PM

The E Man
Suspended
15268 Posts
user info
edit post

once again, hillary has a lot of trouble everywhere except the deep south, deep red states. Impressive movement she has had, but its seems to only be regional.

3/8/2016 11:05:38 PM

UJustWait84
All American
23276 Posts
user info
edit post

She basically split Michigan and dominated in Mississippi, so she's still comes out ahead. If Sanders had beat her by more than a point or two, I'd say it would be an upset. Hillary may very well struggle in the Midwest, but I just don't see her losing any of the huge states. Splitting a state like Michigan certainly helps Sanders more than lopsided wins in KS or Vermont, but I don't think much has changed really.

3/9/2016 1:36:29 AM

synapse
play so hard
52658 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"but I just don't see her losing any of the huge states"


Yup.

3/9/2016 1:45:03 AM

moron
All American
29988 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Splitting a state like Michigan certainly helps Sanders more than lopsided wins in KS or Vermont, but I don't think much has changed really.
"


His win was by a slim margin, and still has a lot of room to go delegates-wise, but he was projected to lose by 20+ points, and won. This is a huge upset, and means more polling needs to be done for the current and future races.

Something changed, maybe Flint debate, but this could be a big momentum shift. We need more races to know for sure obviously.

3/9/2016 1:48:07 AM

Kurtis636
All American
14984 Posts
user info
edit post

She's doing well in the states she has no chance of winning and getting beaten in states the dems often carry. It's been and continues to be an interesting race. The longer it stays close like this the more likely it is that she could actually lose. It's very unlikely but if she loses in Florida it's going to be absolutely nuts up until the convention.

3/9/2016 5:40:19 AM

goalielax
All American
11252 Posts
user info
edit post

it was 12 points the last poll, not 20+. still, big surprise

3/9/2016 7:04:44 AM

adultswim
All American
7040 Posts
user info
edit post

^
The last poll on RCP showed 27. Avg of 21.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/mi/michigan_democratic_presidential_primary-5224.html

Biggest upset in primary history (40 years). Ujustwait refusing to call it as such is pretty funny.

[Edited on March 9, 2016 at 11:16 AM. Reason : .]

3/9/2016 11:15:37 AM

goalielax
All American
11252 Posts
user info
edit post

yeah, i see that. i had seen the ones that were low teens. never saw that last one in the high 20s. clearly, the pollsters were missing something.

3/9/2016 11:48:29 AM

The E Man
Suspended
15268 Posts
user info
edit post

ujustwait is the same person that was campaigning for bernie supporters to give up just a week ago

3/9/2016 8:14:18 PM

UJustWait84
All American
23276 Posts
user info
edit post

Uh, Sanders is still losing. And by quite a bit. You do know that losing is the opposite of winning, right?

3/9/2016 9:47:38 PM

The E Man
Suspended
15268 Posts
user info
edit post

pretty sure he just won michigan. you say loseING which implies present tense. yeah, he lost (past tense) the south badly but hillary hasn't expanded her movement past the bible belt and now the rest of the country is voteING

3/9/2016 10:40:14 PM

UJustWait84
All American
23276 Posts
user info
edit post

So is tying Michigan as big of a deal as tying Iowa? Please, I have a match.

3/9/2016 10:57:29 PM

 Message Boards » The Soap Box » Hillary 2016 Page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 ... 31, Prev Next  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2017 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.37 - our disclaimer.