how about fixing it so that it doesn't put that wolfweb.com stamp on all of your pictures if you have a paid subscription?

and while i don't start all that many threads, it would be nice to be able to do more than one per hour with a paid membership.

6/6/2004 11:14:38 PM

yeah thats fucking bullshit, ive given this site well over 100 bucks i'm sure

6/7/2004 2:52:19 AM

look just suspend esgargs and be done with it

6/7/2004 2:55:24 AM

the wolfweb.com stamp on the pictures annoys me more than the 1 post per hour thing (although if i were to start paying, i wouldn't want that limitation).

the reason i'd pay is for the ability to have more than 50 pictures online, but i don't want all of them tagged with that stamp.

6/8/2004 2:16:19 AM

well. i just put pictures in my gallery for others to know about me, the shit i do and the people i hang around. truly this isn't a good place for storing pictures (watermark and lowered quality)

6/8/2004 2:18:59 AM

bttt

6/10/2004 1:49:39 PM

the watermark won't be removed - it doesn't make financial sense unless all hotlinking is removed - then it does....

6/10/2004 2:19:34 PM

it makes financial sense if it's removed for paid users.

6/10/2004 6:30:51 PM

you evidentily don't know the full costs of hosting a site of this magnitude - it does not make financial sense

6/11/2004 3:35:31 PM

the watermark is there for people that post pics from this site on other sites. even if you remove the watermark from 'paid for' pictures, other people who don't pay can still post those pictures on other sites. that was the reason they put the watermark on there, so that when people on other sites saw the pictures, they would know where they were coming from. it was never a matter of paid vs unpaid on the watermarks.

6/11/2004 10:55:01 PM