plusdelta All American 1034 Posts user info edit post |
I've been thinking about making the jump in the next few months, and wanted to know what some early adopters think. Suggestions for any particular processors welcome. 8/19/2005 10:35:01 PM |
BigB23USAABC All American 913 Posts user info edit post |
I'm not as up on this as I should be. What is the difference in an Athlon 64 say, and an x64 chip? I've had my Athlon64 based lappy for a while, and its been the best c0mpu73r I've ever had. We have an Itanium or whatever that is in our server, and its been a pain in the ass, but I think its the other components and the OS, and not the processor. 8/19/2005 11:17:31 PM |
Wolfrules All American 1880 Posts user info edit post |
the Itanium and Itanium 2 processors are IA-64 processors.. not x64.. the XP 64-bit edition that came out not to long ago is an x64 OS.. so it won't work on the Itanium chip.. Intel has just released an x64 version of their processor 8/20/2005 12:43:58 AM |
Rat Suspended 5724 Posts user info edit post |
i have the new amd 64bit processor, and its pretty good i guess. + the 2 gigs of ram and 256 video ram on the 7800 don't hurt it either.
its much more reliable than a girlfriend i suppose.
[Edited on August 20, 2005 at 1:14 AM. Reason : ok] 8/20/2005 1:12:24 AM |
A Tanzarian drip drip boom 10996 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "its much more reliable than a girlfriend i suppose." |
Sounds like someone needs a hug!8/20/2005 10:34:53 AM |
dakota_man All American 26584 Posts user info edit post |
there doesn't seem to be any (software) reason to switch yet 8/20/2005 4:38:52 PM |
rogueleader All American 12297 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "some early adopters think" |
the early adopters spoke over 1.5 years ago. x64 is a solid choice. if you're upgrading and planning on keeping the system for more than 1 year, don't bother getting anything else.8/20/2005 4:54:00 PM |
plusdelta All American 1034 Posts user info edit post |
The one thing that's been bugging me about actually making a switch to AMD processors is the fact that I really don't have any idea how to compare their actual processing power. With Intel's clock speed comparison, at least you've got some measurement. When AMD threw that out the window, I'm not as comfortable buying something. And I'm not willing to drop $900 on a processor to make sure that I've got the fastest thing. 8/20/2005 5:10:35 PM |
Charybdisjim All American 5486 Posts user info edit post |
^ you do have something to compare their power... they're called "benchmarks." check out anandtech.com or tomshardware.com 8/20/2005 5:59:00 PM |
dakota_man All American 26584 Posts user info edit post |
i wanna get me some dual core hyperthreading 8/20/2005 6:01:00 PM |
EmptyFriend All American 3686 Posts user info edit post |
^^^that's what Intel wanted people to think... that you should only go by clock speed. although they're finally going to be switching to a system more like AMD. 8/20/2005 6:19:08 PM |