panthersny All American 9550 Posts user info edit post |
Ok so I have been doing some digging and have yet to find an answer
why are tu-160 engines mounted so far back under the wings (and you need to provide links to your sources)
My initial guess it the length of the engine with respect to air flow.....but I am trying to confirm this
for your info:
Quote : | "Soviet Designation TU-160 US-Designation Blackjack Design Bureau OKB-156 Tupolev Manufacturer Plant Nr. 22 Kazan Power Plant 4 HK-32 turbojet engines Thrust 25.000 kg each " |
8/22/2005 9:53:30 AM |
Aficionado Suspended 22518 Posts user info edit post |
because didnt they copy one of our bombers? 8/22/2005 9:58:14 AM |
panthersny All American 9550 Posts user info edit post |
yes it is similar to the B1-B Lancer (aka the Bone)
i was wondering cause of soooo much exposed turbine
8/22/2005 10:09:15 AM |
packguy381 All American 32719 Posts user info edit post |
IN SOVIET RUSSIA....
fill in the blank 8/22/2005 11:50:29 AM |
Mr. Joshua Swimfanfan 43948 Posts user info edit post |
In Soviet Russia blank fills you. 8/22/2005 11:51:51 AM |
sumfoo1 soup du hier 41043 Posts user info edit post |
my guestimate is to take advantage of the high pressure below the wings but still give similar flight characteristics to a rear engined plane... it would also keep the thust of the engines away from the tail as much as possible and on a plane w/ that much thrust velocity that could be critical to not rip off the horizontal stabilizer. (notice it is also elevated out of the thrust path) 8/22/2005 12:05:53 PM |