MathFreak All American 14478 Posts user info edit post |
I moved to Denver and all of a sudden I can drive ~400 miles on one tank, where it used to be 330 in North Carolina. I still buy the cheapest gas (87).
Why is that? 12/2/2005 10:59:33 PM |
State409c Suspended 19558 Posts user info edit post |
Thats makes zero since considering you just moved to an array with a shit ton more hills. 12/2/2005 11:00:32 PM |
AVON All American 4770 Posts user info edit post |
they putting methanol or something extra in the fuel up there? 12/2/2005 11:03:56 PM |
Schmitty All American 982 Posts user info edit post |
[pulled out] higher elevation, less air intake, less fuel combusted per stroke? [/ of my ass]
[Edited on December 2, 2005 at 11:17 PM. Reason : no clue] 12/2/2005 11:17:07 PM |
1in10^9 All American 7451 Posts user info edit post |
you are at elevation...which means less air in atmosphere. that means your car will uptake less air, which means less fuel to match less air, which means less performance.
trade off... 12/2/2005 11:56:54 PM |
Lumex All American 3666 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Thats makes zero since considering you just moved to an array with a shit ton more hills." | The denver area is utterly flat. No trees, just flat open plains until you hit the Rocky mountain range. Then it goes from flat to mountains in less than a mile.12/3/2005 12:43:03 AM |
theDuke866 All American 52839 Posts user info edit post |
^^
there you go.
as you increase in altitude above mean sea level (MSL), the atmospheric pressure decreases (at a pretty linear rate called the standard lapse rate, which is valid until you get really high...way higher than Denver).
as the total atmospheric pressure decreases, so then does the partial pressure of oxygen (and nitrogen, argon, and all of the other trace gases in air). Your engine still takes in the same VOLUME of air in each revolution (350 cubic inches, 2.0 liters, etc), but a lower MASS of air.
Stoichiometric combustion ratios remain at 14.7:1 for air and gasoline. Since your engine is intaking a lower MASS quantity of oxygen, it's burning less fuel. This results in reduced power output, but better fuel economy. 12/3/2005 1:43:52 AM |
1in10^9 All American 7451 Posts user info edit post |
yeah...and on a side note this is one of the reasons turbocharged cars are less affected at elevation than n/a cars. forced induction 12/3/2005 2:31:35 AM |
arghx Deucefest '04 7584 Posts user info edit post |
and yet they still call it a mass airflow sensor 12/3/2005 4:09:56 AM |
drunknloaded Suspended 147487 Posts user info edit post |
man theduke has been the man lately when it comes to explaining shit out 12/3/2005 6:23:28 AM |
tkeaton All American 5775 Posts user info edit post |
its ok, he had subway for lunch 12/3/2005 8:18:47 AM |
State409c Suspended 19558 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "The denver area is utterly flat. No trees, just flat open plains until you hit the Rocky mountain range. Then it goes from flat to mountains in less than a mile." |
Yea, even as I posted it I was thinking "I don't know what the fuck I am talking about."12/3/2005 9:21:08 AM |
stone All American 6003 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "man theduke has been the man lately when it comes to explaining shit out" |
he lives in a holiday inn express12/3/2005 11:25:53 AM |
Poe87 All American 1639 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "and yet they still call it a mass airflow sensor" |
what?12/4/2005 8:03:41 PM |
Aficionado Suspended 22518 Posts user info edit post |
just another self pwnt brought to you by arghx 12/4/2005 10:01:59 PM |
MathFreak All American 14478 Posts user info edit post |
Thanks. That makes sense. But it's pretty strange that the gain in terms of fuel economy is that significant. 12/6/2005 1:25:19 PM |