Shut the hell up already, no one cares about your crap

See this is what i love about conspiracy nuts. they need NO evidence, or credible evidence at least. becasue the lack of evidence is then contributed to the cleverness of the ones behind it. the less evidence, the more power and cover up garbage they can spew. it takes no shred of proof or credibility to make their case.

[Edited on December 14, 2005 at 8:42 AM. Reason : .]

12/14/2005 8:30:09 AM

it's ok, either the CIA, the Jews, or some other secret society will take him away and erase his memory soon enough

12/14/2005 8:37:13 AM

i think the jews, who were sent by the mossad and the zionist US govment, will swoop in and kidnap him in the night since he is on to all of their secrets

12/14/2005 8:39:54 AM

frankly im surprised he hasnt posted anything about flu shots controlling our minds and causing the Christmas shopping frenzy.

12/14/2005 8:40:01 AM

If you didn't care then you wouldn't have made this thread, you wouldn't read my threads/posts, and you wouldn't respond to my threads/posts. You care all right. You don't like my views, and you don't want me voicing those views. You, and many others here, would like to have me censored. That's no secret.

12/14/2005 8:41:59 AM

no, i respect your right to think and say what you want, i just wish you would like chill and not post your shit every 5 minutes. i mean damn bro. seems like every time i look there is a new conspiracy thread. give it a rest for a while

12/14/2005 8:43:57 AM

nah the point is that everything prisonplanet or whatever posts, he makes a thread about. those of us that do care, im assuming already read your conspiracy theory websites on a regular basis.

nothing to do with wanting to censor you, just that i'd rather not see bunches of whacko threads every day.

12/14/2005 8:45:55 AM

Quote :

"nothing to do with wanting to censor you, just that i'd rather not see bunches of whacko threads every day."

And so what if you don't like seeing my threads? I don't like seeing a lot of the threads on here, but I'm not advocating that people be banned and censored because I disagree with them. If you don't like my threads, don't open them.

I'm not breaking any rules, and I'm not creating an excessive number of threads. Plus, I try to contain my posts in a few threads--further limiting the number of threads I make. I also think part of what you're seeing is that the other posters in the Soap Box aren't all that active in responding to existing threads or creating new threads.

I'm not going to shut up and stop posting just because a few of you don't like my threads. There are always going to be people who disagree or oppose other viewpoints. That is what freedom of speech is all about. If you advocate censoring minority viewpoints, you are trampling freedom of speech.

12/14/2005 9:05:07 AM

Quote :

"I'm not breaking any rules"

you reply to yourself repeatedly. THAT IS BREAKING A RULE. if no one cares enough about your drivel to post in it since the last time you did, maybe that should tell you something.

your threads would die if you wouldn't keep bttt'ing them, to MAKE SURE that they get seen OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN.

Quote :

"That is what freedom of speech is all about. If you advocate censoring minority viewpoints, you are trampling freedom of speech."

this is a privately run site and freedom of speech does not apply.

[Edited on December 14, 2005 at 9:11 AM. Reason : *]

12/14/2005 9:10:50 AM

Freedom is on the march!

^^BTW, it's not just "a few." NO ONE likes them. You, along with pryderi and THABIGL have pretty much brought any real discussion in here to a screeching halt. I don't even bother trying anymore. The Soap Box basically consists of +-3 (depending on suspensions and / or current political conditions) extremist talking heads, and the brave few from the old school that refuse to let this place cave in on itself.

[Edited on December 14, 2005 at 9:17 AM. Reason : ]

12/14/2005 9:11:40 AM

[Edited on December 14, 2005 at 9:17 AM. Reason : double post]

12/14/2005 9:17:03 AM

Quote :

"your threads would die if you wouldn't keep bttt'ing them, to MAKE SURE that they get seen OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN. "

As I just said, I try to confine much of my posting to a few threads. This limits the number of new threads that need to be made.

Quote :

"this is a privately run site and freedom of speech does not apply."

This website does not censor people based on their views. Are you suggesting that they should do this?

[Edited on December 14, 2005 at 9:19 AM. Reason : `]

12/14/2005 9:17:55 AM

i'm suggesting they take away YOUR thread making abilities

12/14/2005 9:22:43 AM

not people

YOU

12/14/2005 9:24:23 AM

ok, you guys admittedly want to censor me

admitting your problem is the first step

12/14/2005 9:28:32 AM

I dunno, taking away his thread making abilities would just make him start posting his crap in other threads were there is some semblance of a correlation between the topics.

I am truely tired of his shit. It used to be fun to see what flavor of crazy he mixed up today but the novelty of it is long gone. If I get super bored then I will jump in a thread and make a few points to which he never responds. If he was remotely active in logical discussion (responding to points and acknowledging errors/mistakes/lunacies) then I wouldn't care, but as of now he has absolutely zero use on these forums other than being a long running joke.

I actually almost came to work as salisburyboy for Halloween this year. Was gonna get the AFDB (http://zapatopi.net/afdb/) and everything .

12/14/2005 9:33:29 AM

Quote :

"If he was remotely active in logical discussion "

I am involved in logical discussion on these forums (though perhaps not enough to your particular liking). What does it look like I'm doing in this very thread?

12/14/2005 9:49:33 AM

scratching, clawing and gnashing your teeth at the idea that your shit should get dealt with

12/14/2005 10:22:41 AM

and in your world "dealt with" means "censored"

so, yes, I'm defending myself against the insane idea that I should be censored because of my views

I'm defending myslef against free speech hating crazies like yourself

12/14/2005 10:26:02 AM

I believe he was talking about how you avoid logical arguments to points you raised by using the childish retorts that you use over and over again. I think you are batshit crazy but if they start taking peoples thread making abilities away that would be wrong, but I think suspensions should be handed out for things that are becoming redundant. Suchas your latest regurgitation from Prison Planet or Alex Jones. We get that you don't trust the Government or Jews.

12/14/2005 10:34:29 AM

Quote :

"I believe he was talking about how you avoid logical arguments to points you raised by using the childish retorts that you use over and over again. I think you are batshit crazy..."

And what exactly are the "childish retorts" I'm supposedly using?

[Edited on December 14, 2005 at 10:38 AM. Reason : `]

12/14/2005 10:37:47 AM

ONCE AGAIN AND FOR THE LOVE OF GOD LET THIS SINK IN

FREE SPEECH DOES NOT APPLY ON A PRIVATELY RUN WEBSITE

eat shit

12/14/2005 10:46:31 AM

let this sink in, you free-speech hating crazy

Quote :

"This website does not censor people based on their views. Are you suggesting that they should do this? "

12/14/2005 10:53:53 AM

i am suggesting they remove YOUR thread making ability or TERMINATE you

[Edited on December 14, 2005 at 10:55 AM. Reason : *]

12/14/2005 10:54:56 AM

Quote :

"i am suggesting they remove YOUR thread making ability or TERMINATE you"

you already said that genius

you want me censored. got it

and ON WHAT BASIS should I be censored? Because you don't agree with me?

[Edited on December 14, 2005 at 10:56 AM. Reason : `]

12/14/2005 10:55:40 AM

you already said your little quote too, genius.

because you annoy THE FUCK out of everyone in the SB and have even begun spilling that shit over into the lounge

you claimed you don't break any rules and it's already been pointed out that you break at least one habitually, if you want even more reason for a suspension

[Edited on December 14, 2005 at 10:58 AM. Reason : *]

12/14/2005 10:56:55 AM

Quote :

"because you annoy THE FUCK out of everyone in the SB and have even begun spilling that shit over into the lounge"

That's not true. Not everyone. Just a few vocal opponents, like yourself, who are going nuts complaining to the mods trying to get me censored. And that is certainly not a reason for suspension.

Quote :

"you claimed you don't break any rules and it's already been pointed out that you break at least one habitually, if you want even more reason for a suspension "

Really? What rule is that?

[Edited on December 14, 2005 at 11:04 AM. Reason : `]

12/14/2005 11:03:13 AM

Quote :

"you reply to yourself repeatedly. THAT IS BREAKING A RULE. if no one cares enough about your drivel to post in it since the last time you did, maybe that should tell you something. your threads would die if you wouldn't keep bttt'ing them, to MAKE SURE that they get seen OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN."

can you fucking read?

12/14/2005 11:04:22 AM

There is only a rule against replying to a thread successively WITHIN THE 30 MINUTE TIME FOR EDITING.

There is not a rule against replying to a thread successively after the 30 minute time for editing, such as bttt'ing an old thread.

Do you get that, troll?

12/14/2005 11:09:37 AM

Quote :

"if no one cares enough about your drivel to post in it since the last time you did, maybe that should tell you something."

DO YOU GET THAT, EUNUCH?

12/14/2005 11:11:15 AM

ok, so you're conceding that I'm actually NOT breaking any rule habitually?

12/14/2005 11:16:40 AM

Quote :

"if no one cares enough about your drivel to post in it since the last time you did, maybe that should tell you something."

DO YOU GET THAT, EUNUCH?

[Edited on December 14, 2005 at 11:19 AM. Reason : *]

12/14/2005 11:19:27 AM

and that's breaking WHAT rule again, troll?

[Edited on December 14, 2005 at 11:25 AM. Reason : `]

12/14/2005 11:25:10 AM

well let's see

in the last few days you've broken this one:

Quote :

"Post new threads in the right section - Save us the trouble of having to move your topic to the correct section. Post in the right section to begin with."

by posting bullshit that one, doesn't really belong in SB, but then you stuck it in the lounge

you habitually break this one:

Quote :

"Be thoughtful/humorous - Hundreds of people browse the message board each day. Before you post something, think to yourself, "would the majority of the users want to read this?". If the answer is "no", then don't post it."

because the overwhelming majority of people in SB don't want to read your shit.

and you've broken this one numerous times, WITHIN THE 30 MINUTES:

Quote :

"Do not consecutively reply to a topic - If you are within the alloted timespan for editing a message that no one has replied to and you think of something to add, EDIT the message. DO NOT REPLY AGAIN. Constant abuse of this will not be tolerated. "

well let's see how you refute this shit.

[Edited on December 14, 2005 at 11:32 AM. Reason : *]

12/14/2005 11:32:25 AM

well let's see how you refute ignore this shit.

12/14/2005 11:36:59 AM

Quote :

"well let's see how you refute this shit"

Oooooh. You don't think I can respond to this, even when you and your band of censor-crazy trolls brought up these same lame arguments a few days ago?

1. That was one time where a mod said the thread was not in the right section, and it is debatable whether the topic was actually inappropriate for the Lounge. The Lounge supposedly pretends to harbor discussion on "news" items.

2. I question whether that is a "rule" that is used as the basis to suspend posters. It seems more like a guideline for posters.

#1: Is my belief (ie, the thoughts of the poster) the standard here? Because I DO believe the majority of the users want to read the things I post. If so, case closed. I haven't broken the "rule"/guideline.

#2: If the belief of the poster is NOT the standard, then does that mean if 49.5% of the posters don't want to read the content of the post, then that user must be suspended and banned? OF COURSE NOT. Such a rule would mean that only majority views could be posted and expressed. It would be a rule that censors minority viewpoints. That's ridiculous.

3. I admit I may have broken that rule before, but so have MANY others. It's broken all the time in Chit Chat. Are you going to go after them too? And you're calling on me to be BANNED/SUSPENDED for that? Isn't that a little excessive? A mere warning would be more appropriate.

OH, AND THANKS 30thAnnZ FOR BRINGING UP THESE ISSUES AGAIN. YOUR PATHETIC CRUSADE TO HAVE ME CENSORED STOOPS TO NEW LOWS IN STUPIDITY.

[Edited on December 14, 2005 at 11:42 AM. Reason : `]

12/14/2005 11:41:27 AM

YOU asked what rule you break. you claimed not to. i made no such claim of my own.

the reason this shit has gone on and on is the SB moderator doesn't do their job.

Quote :

"Because I DO believe the majority of the users want to read the things I post."

you clearly are an idiot.

[Edited on December 14, 2005 at 11:44 AM. Reason : *]

12/14/2005 11:43:01 AM

Quote :

"the reason this shit has gone on "

WHAT has "gone on"? My ability to freely express my opinions?

12/14/2005 11:44:34 AM

you annoying the hell out of nearly EVERYONE in the SB

somehow somebody managed to get the big girl suspended, pryderi has gone on some sort of hiatus, and that leaves YOU.

you three are responsible for the SB being a shadow of it's former self.

12/14/2005 11:46:22 AM

Quote :

"you annoying the hell out of nearly EVERYONE in the SB"

first off, it's not everyone. its just you and a few others. and annoying people is not grounds for suspension, troll

Quote :

"you three are responsible for the SB being a shadow of it's former self."

yes, genius, the forum changes as new posters come in. i guess that's grounds for censorship according to you as well

[Edited on December 14, 2005 at 11:48 AM. Reason : `]

12/14/2005 11:47:42 AM

Quote :

"annoying people is not grounds for suspension, troll"

it is, and has been used as such MANY times

Quote :

"yes, genius, the forum changes as new posters come in"

motherfucker, you three are responsible for no real discussion to be allowed. between the three of you, only extreme bullshit gets posted. one liberal douche bag drivel, another right wing douche bag drivel, and you with your bat shit crazy bullshit.

if your IQ was even above room temperature, you'd get that your shit is fucking crazy and cut it back a notch.

[Edited on December 14, 2005 at 11:50 AM. Reason : *]

12/14/2005 11:49:38 AM

you do realize that you are advocating censorship of users based on their ideology/viewpoints?

if those ideologies/viewpoints "annoy" you, too bad

cry yourself to sleep at night for all we care

[Edited on December 14, 2005 at 11:52 AM. Reason : 1]

12/14/2005 11:52:06 AM

no i'm advocating suspending YOU and leaving the rest alone.

and you know what, if i get suspended too for fueling yours, it's worth it.

you're the one fighting with such veracity to keep the ability to post INSANE BULLSHIT.



[Edited on December 14, 2005 at 11:54 AM. Reason : *]

12/14/2005 11:52:49 AM

What are you afraid of troll? Do my views frighten you?

[Edited on December 14, 2005 at 11:54 AM. Reason : `]

12/14/2005 11:53:41 AM

firghten? hardly.

i pity you for falling for such laughable shit.

12/14/2005 11:54:40 AM

PM

12/14/2005 11:54:57 AM

is that you crying when the mods said they weren't going to suspend me just because you are "annoyed" by me?

12/14/2005 11:55:31 AM

no this shit needs to be aired out. because everyone feels this way, few will actually voice it. most of the decent denizens of SB have already been run out by this lunatic.

^ i have not spoken, pm'd, emailed, telephoned, or smoke signaled a single mod. and that's you crying because OMG I HAVE PISSED PEOPLE OFF.

[Edited on December 14, 2005 at 11:56 AM. Reason : *]

12/14/2005 11:55:49 AM

I haven't run anyone away you crybaby

12/14/2005 11:56:18 AM

awwww is salisbury feeling a little defensive?

btw, since you've been arguing about this shit this morning, you haven't had much time to post any of your shit.

mission accomplished.

oh and i'm done, later.

[Edited on December 14, 2005 at 11:58 AM. Reason : *]

12/14/2005 11:57:30 AM