...the TWW Law Offices. Seriously. Especially with all the constitutional scholars running around on here proving that W's actions are illegal and traitorous. We could make a killing.

I love you guys

12/19/2005 1:22:39 PM

HAHAHAHA! good job!

12/19/2005 2:13:49 PM

Quote :

"Especially with all the constitutional scholars running around on here proving that W's actions are illegal and traitorous patriotic. We could make a killing."

12/19/2005 2:49:56 PM

We'll have to make MathFreak the Senior Partner by default, but I think we can make room for Gamecat as the firm spin doctor. And we'll throw in DG as the Director for Hippie Outreach.

12/19/2005 2:56:07 PM

Actually, I think you and Wolfpack2K are going to need to take an extended leave of absence. You're needed already by Tom Delay, Duke Cunningham, Jack Abramoff, and senior PNAC fellow "Scooter." You've already got your work cut out for you.

Let the rest of us handle W.

12/19/2005 3:05:51 PM

soon as you do, i'll do a hostile takeover and shit on everyone's faces

12/19/2005 3:56:45 PM

Might as well toss this idea out the window. Everyone knows TWWers are too cheap to pay the costs associated with incorporating.

12/19/2005 4:09:18 PM

I'm down, just so long as we can sue the adminstration for the torture.

12/19/2005 4:25:47 PM

^^
haha gg...

12/20/2005 9:27:35 AM

"director of hippie outreach" would look great on my resume

12/21/2005 9:20:25 AM

We can make wednesday or JoshNumbers the Vice President of "OMF the Constitution is a living document! Except when I say it's not!!1"

12/21/2005 1:13:00 PM

so, are ggmon, jwhw, wolfpack4life and the big girl gonna be running wolfpack2k's campaign next year?

12/21/2005 4:34:42 PM

This would go great with your Economic Consulting Firm.


You know, the one where you tell Nobel-prize winning economists that they don't understand economics.

12/21/2005 5:05:14 PM

when did Krugman win a Nobel again?...

12/21/2005 10:02:01 PM

Actually you said John McCain didn't understand economics because he said growing structural deficits were dangerous for the economy. Sad thing is that hundreds of economists (including nobel prize winners like Paul Samuelson and Robert Solow) signed a petition repremanding Bush for the exact same thing.

But ignoring that (but i'm sure you'll ignore the following instead), Krugman actually won the JBClark medal. It's slightly harder to win than a nobel prize since it is only awarded to economists under 40 (so you have to work harder earlier, and there is a time limit, so to speak) and it's only awarded once every two years (so you have even fewer opportunities to win it). Another JBClark winner you seemed to like was Steven Levitt, author of Freakonomics.

[Edited on December 21, 2005 at 10:12 PM. Reason : ``]

12/21/2005 10:09:16 PM

Quote :

"Socks``: Sad thing is that hundreds of economists (including nobel prize winners like Paul Samuelson and Robert Solow) signed a petition repremanding Bush for the exact same thing."

And yet other winners took the precisely opposite view. So with your new standard against me that everyone winning a Nobel by default "knows what they're talking about", which of those sets of Nobel winners don't know what they're talking about?

---

Quote :

"Socks``: But ignoring that (but i'm sure you'll ignore the following instead), Krugman actually won the JBClark medal. It's slightly harder to win than a nobel prize since it is only awarded to economists under 40 (so you have to work harder earlier, and there is a time limit, so to speak) and it's only awarded once every two years (so you have even fewer opportunities to win it)."

Was there some correlation between the difficulty of winning any given award and the merit represented by said award?

[Edited on December 21, 2005 at 10:34 PM. Reason : ---]

12/21/2005 10:32:17 PM

Like whom? Which Nobeler supported Bush?

Milton Friedman wrote some favorable reviews of Bush's tax cuts...of course...his argument was that they would result in burdensome deficits that would inspire people to demand government spending cuts. So I'm not sure that counts toward your argument, since even Friedman agrees the deficits would be troublesom.

---

Are you saying the JBClark Medal has no merit? Or awards that have great merit are easy to get? Either way, you're not making much sense.

[Edited on December 21, 2005 at 10:38 PM. Reason : ``]

12/21/2005 10:36:20 PM