for both dems and republicans (in your opinion, of course).

12/28/2005 2:54:39 PM

Someone who knows how to use >Search<

12/28/2005 2:56:55 PM

im not gonna fucking search on every topic i make. I didnt see one, so I am making one. Suck a cock.


any non-asswipes who wanna give input on this thread, feel free.

[Edited on December 28, 2005 at 2:59 PM. Reason : your mom]

12/28/2005 2:58:47 PM

gov mark warner is gonna win

12/28/2005 3:01:43 PM

Excellent topic...although I dont know...Hillary Clinton v John McCain?

12/28/2005 3:02:51 PM

HILLARY CLINTON IS A COMMUNIST

12/28/2005 3:05:37 PM

you are a communist

12/28/2005 3:07:52 PM

I AM! I KNOW IT!

ITS AN EPIDEMIC!

do you think Ross Perot will run in 2008?

12/28/2005 3:14:06 PM

You don't have to search every dumb topic you make.

Just the most obvious ones.

12/28/2005 3:31:08 PM

Perot/Badnarik/Clinton/McCain

It'll be split evenly between them all, you'll see!!!!

!!!!
111

1111111

111
!

12/28/2005 3:37:35 PM

How about...You don't have to search any topic you dont want to because who gives a shit...if its old and you don't want to read it, don't

12/28/2005 3:44:10 PM

I give a shit.

So do people who have been discussing this shit for months now.

If you want to know what we don't give a shit about though

I can easily tell you

Your own, old, unoriginal opinions.

12/28/2005 3:46:49 PM

mark warner > *

12/28/2005 3:47:42 PM

What kind of gratification do you get out of surfing around TWW and pointing out when people have posted a topic that has already been discussed?

12/28/2005 3:48:33 PM

i'll admit

its pretty fucking fun

12/28/2005 3:49:43 PM

I get nothing from it.

But seeing the same topic 59023852098520938 times makes my eyes bleed.

12/28/2005 3:52:24 PM

HAHA I pay more attention to what people talk about on the WolfWeb and therefore you are an idiot for not knowing! This is the funniest thing I will probably be a part of all day long!

12/28/2005 3:52:46 PM

If it makes your eyes bleed might I suggest looking at a different board? I look on here a few times each day and to me it looks like almost everything (other than actual news, which is new by default) is pretty much old, so deal

12/28/2005 3:54:44 PM

Warner vs. Allen



/please, please, please, please, please, please, please

12/28/2005 4:01:47 PM

Its not a matter of paying attention sir, its a matter of being so arrogant as to think you're (already beaten to death) idea for a thread warrants a posting.

12/28/2005 4:16:52 PM

I'm sorry but youre going to have to excuse my ignorance for a second here...I am having trouble figuring out what it is exactly that connects curiosity about what other people think on a particular subject and being arrogant...

"Who will be on the 2008 pres. ticket?" -- Oh yeah, nevermind, that question just exudes arrogance, I see it now

12/28/2005 4:27:10 PM

sand santa...you have wasted five posts talking about this crap...just shut up

12/28/2005 4:32:41 PM

Its not the question sir, its the act. A simple search and a BTTT of the threads this was discussed in is just proper internet forum etiquette. How could you possibly argue that you're interested in logical debate if you won't take the time to join discussions already in place? If you don't want logical debate, then post in Chit Chat.

12/28/2005 4:55:01 PM

A simple search of "2008" brought these threads:


"Warner vs. Allen in 2008"
http://www.brentroad.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=368868

"Who will run in 2008"
http://www.brentroad.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=263586

"McCain/Powell for 2008"
http://www.brentroad.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=263372

to name a few.

12/28/2005 4:57:02 PM

Well I don't disagree that should this be the case it is possibly in the wrong forum, but what about the thread title suggests that he wanted a logical debate? He hasn't really expressed an opinion, but just asked what people think. And even if this is the wrong forum for a simple question, it would seem like a logical place to ask that particular question.

12/28/2005 5:00:02 PM

I'm not going to speculate on his intent. I only wanted to highlight the stupidity of this post.

12/28/2005 5:03:29 PM

this thread as gone wayyyy off topic

^oh and btw I JUST checked...the first thread of those 3 is the only one less than 90 days old

[Edited on December 28, 2005 at 5:10 PM. Reason : ]

12/28/2005 5:05:24 PM

Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert

12/28/2005 8:56:16 PM

I guess my real problem here is why insist on pointing that out each and every time someone makes an old thread. You are like the people that waste their time trying to get Howard Stern off the air (or whatever, pick an example)...instead of simply not reading the thread, you take time out just to go into it and point out that the topic is old, just like people waste their time trying to argue why Stern is bad entertainment instead of just tuning out.

Also, this is an ever changing issue, new candidates can arise over time, maybe there was some news yesterday that he missed? He had a simple question, what is the big fucking deal about just asking the question before he spends more time researching to see if its already been done just so you won't label his thread old?

And by the way, the fact that people are seriously responding suggests to me that this is a topic some people feel is still worth discussing.

12/28/2005 8:59:36 PM

Russ Feingold.

12/28/2005 11:21:19 PM

Allen/Giuliani vs Clinton/most conservative democrat she can find

12/29/2005 12:26:43 AM

OMG

THE COMMIES

12/29/2005 12:54:10 AM

i don't follow the hype/political trends too closely, but:

mccain/lieberman?

clinton/edwards?

12/29/2005 12:59:22 AM

^three of the people you just mentioned are democrats
and all four of them are left of the current trends in america

a vast majority of republican members of the house say they'd rather have cheney campaign for them than mccain (i forget if that came out in CW or NR last month)

12/29/2005 1:22:43 AM

Quote :

"and all four of them are left of the current trends in america"

i disagree

maybe left of the current GOP, but not America as a whole

maybe perceived that way, though

12/29/2005 2:19:41 AM

I'd bet they're left of the electorate, what with all the vote rocking the GOP's been doing with the fundies.

12/29/2005 2:30:11 AM

if republicans want any chance of winning they better figure out a way to make mccain run and have one hell of a vp candidate

12/29/2005 3:17:29 AM

Condi v Hillary

12/29/2005 3:33:31 AM

never gonna happen VS false security

12/29/2005 5:56:14 AM

Barney vs. Socks

12/29/2005 8:42:23 AM

Quote :

"mccain/lieberman?"

Economic conservative/socially moderate Republican + Economic moderate/socially conservative Democrat

I thought the idea was to motivate people to turn out for you (despite what the Kerry nomination might have led you to believe).

12/29/2005 9:04:14 AM

hahahahhaha

gg

"none of the above" wins in a landslide

12/29/2005 9:30:57 AM

yeah, maybe mccain/lieberman is wishful thinking

i'd much rather see lieberman on the GOP ticket, so i wouldn't have to vote for him


plus, i couldn't imagine 2 hawks like clinton/lieberman on a democratic ticket

[Edited on December 29, 2005 at 10:18 AM. Reason : .]

12/29/2005 10:11:06 AM

Republicans will likely be at a disadvantage in the next presidential election, however Im wondering if the democrats can step up without tripping. It doesnt seem like they've changed much since '04. They still lack the ability to inspire confidence in the general public. This years elections will tell.

12/29/2005 10:56:02 AM

am i the only one who thinks the person who does the most to vocally criticize the president gets the republican nomination?

i just have this feeling that bush's last days are gonna be like an eskimo's last days

the crowd trying to see who can push him farthest away

12/29/2005 5:37:56 PM

knowing this country, we'll probably still end up with two morons facing off against each other.

libermann vs. frist sounds about right.

12/29/2005 6:28:39 PM

Haha, holy crap that'd suck.


All this talk about Warner made be read his bio. I'm psyched about him running.

[Edited on December 29, 2005 at 6:32 PM. Reason : .]

12/29/2005 6:32:14 PM

george clinton

12/29/2005 6:36:45 PM

^^way to jump on the bandwagon

i mean.....

glad to have you

warner 08

12/30/2005 12:51:45 AM

I wish Schwartzeniggar could run.

He would make a great president.

12/30/2005 1:07:20 AM