Saddamizer Suspended 5294 Posts user info edit post |
I've got a chance to make a great prop bet for five hundred, I just wanna make sure I understand the wording correctly. It reads as follows:
Quote : | " Neither the Colts NOR Seahawks Play in 2006 Super Bowl 01/22/06 220 Yes -300 OFF OFF 13:05 ET No +240 OFF OFF
" |
I'm thinking in this case the +240 is on NEITHER team making the Super Bowl. So if either seattle, who is 8-0 at home, or the colts, who are 6-1, make the game, I get paid 1200 on my wager. Is this the correct wording? No means that at least one of the teams will play, while Yes means that the the propistion is true, and neither team will play? The reason I ask is that the odds almost seem like they should be reversed, with 2.4 to 1 odds going against either team making the super bowl. It seems very likely that at least one team will make it. Am I reading this correctly, or does it seem conspicuously worded?1/1/2006 11:58:47 AM |
rallydurham Suspended 11317 Posts user info edit post |
you've got it backwards.
I'm not sure what to do with the whole niether, nor thing... and I think your analysis of the question is correct...
Id email the book and ask for clarification.
but i assure you that taking yes means one of the teams will be in
taking no means they will not.
I'd lay the -300 and take yes.
[Edited on January 1, 2006 at 12:04 PM. Reason : a] 1/1/2006 12:03:00 PM |
Saddamizer Suspended 5294 Posts user info edit post |
yeah im gonna call them before the games start today. The lines sound wierd, and from a grammatical perspective they seem too good to be true. But I'm almost sure its the other way around as you said. 1/1/2006 12:09:17 PM |
Saddamizer Suspended 5294 Posts user info edit post |
Crazy stuff, i talked to 3 guys and they all swore it was the way it appears to be, with +240 coming my way if either SEATTLE or INDY makes it. Seems like easy money to me. Im down for 5 hundred, possibly a thousand 1/1/2006 12:17:57 PM |
rallydurham Suspended 11317 Posts user info edit post |
what book is this and who did you talk to? 1/1/2006 12:25:31 PM |
Saddamizer Suspended 5294 Posts user info edit post |
this particular one is on sportsbook.com, i talked to some idiot named arthur, then 3 other peple who all assured me that it would pay this way. I also got an email confrimation in case they try to fuck me. 1/1/2006 12:43:11 PM |
rallydurham Suspended 11317 Posts user info edit post |
Lee: Hello Lee: How may I help you? rally: hello, I need clarification on a proposition bet... rally: it is under NFL season props #220 rally: Would you please identify what "yes" infers and what "no" infers rally: If the Colts were to play the Bears in the super bowl... would "yes" be the winner or would "no" be the winner Lee: can you tell what the bet says Lee: ? rally: yes rally: "Neither the Colts NOR the Seahawks Play in 2006 Super Bowl" rally: Yes (-300) or No (+240) Lee: we have had a few enquiries regarding this and my supervisor is looking into it presently Lee: If you can wait i will be able to tell you shortly, or you can contact us later today? rally: what is the policy if they decide to switch the wording rally: can the bet be refunded? rally: or do i get to keep my original bet Lee: Well we are infact trying to find out exactly what they mean by the wording, i suggest you do not place the bet until we confirm exactly what the bet entails rally: okay well an operator earlier confirmed the bet was correct earlier and its already been placed rally: i was thinking about wagering more Lee: ok, what was your interpretation of the bet rally: That if the Colts OR Seahawks play in the Super Bowl then "No" is the correct answer rally: i used the example if the Colts play the Bears would "no" be correct and the operator said i was correct Lee: sorry just give me one moment to confirm this 1/1/2006 1:31:17 PM |
rallydurham Suspended 11317 Posts user info edit post |
Lee: ok a yes bet means that if at least one or both teams do not make the final you will win rally: ? rally: what does a no bet mean? rally: it says "nor" Lee: ok, a no bet means that you win only if both teams play in the final rally: i dont believe that is consistent with the wording rally: it doesnt say they have to play each other in the bet rally: its says "Play" rally: as in rally: Seatlle doesnt play in the super bowl rally: or Indy doesnt play in the super bowl Lee: That is what we have been told the bet means we had our linesmakers review it and they have told us that is how the bet stands rally: okay well heres the thing rally: your other operator told me it meant something else rally: so if its possible id like to have my bet cancelled Lee: ok i will set up a ticket and forward this to our wagering department to have it reviewed for a refund, one moment
Better go get your money back, they're not being honest about it. 1/1/2006 1:41:02 PM |
HaLo All American 14264 Posts user info edit post |
see if it was a both playing bet I would have worded it as the superbowl will be played between the colts and the seahawks not all that double negative shit.
sketchyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
technically they are correct with the neither nor bit.
[Edited on January 1, 2006 at 3:49 PM. Reason : .] 1/1/2006 3:48:42 PM |
rallydurham Suspended 11317 Posts user info edit post |
^ are they? i still dont see how they are correct.
Or why the hell they used all that garbage wording.
There is a separate bet already available if you wish to bet on Seattle vs Indianapolis in the Super Bowl.
They better refund that shit ive got $500 on it. Their operator incorrectly stated the terms of the bet before I took it.
IF they don't screw those shady bastards.
And go Colts/Seahawks! 1/1/2006 3:58:33 PM |
rallydurham Suspended 11317 Posts user info edit post |
Well they just changed the meaning AGAIN!
Now ive gotta have the Colts AND Seahawks miss the super bowl... unbelievable
Shadiest thing ever.
Thanks a lot Saddamizer. 1/3/2006 12:01:13 PM |
rallydurham Suspended 11317 Posts user info edit post |
Cory: ok - there was confusion about this bet and all new staff were informed as follows as to the understanding of the bet : Cory: Neither the Colts NOR Seahawks Play in 2006 Super Bowl Cory: Yes -300 Cory: No +240 Cory: Cory: If one of, or both, of the Colts or the Seahawks DO NOT make the Cory: superbowl final then a 'YES' bet will win. Cory: Cory: The only way for a 'NO' bet to win is for BOTH the Colts and the Cory: Seahawks to play in the superbowl final. Cory:
Cory: I know you were informed wrongly Cory: We are aware of this Cory: and we have a ticket open for compensation for this error by LEE Cory: Your account and the chats are under review for a bonus to comp for this error Cory: Per tracking no ########## Cory: at this point Cory: we are fully aware of the situation, apologise for it, but ask that you be patient until a final decision on a bonus has been compiled for you Cory: We will e-mail you shortly at: Cory: with the news on the bonus Cory: You are very welcome Cory: Again, sorry for the confusion this bet has caused 1/3/2006 12:49:48 PM |
TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148457 Posts user info edit post |
TAKE THE YES 1/3/2006 12:53:52 PM |
Woodfoot All American 60354 Posts user info edit post |
ahahahahaha
I'M SO COOL CAUSE I GAMBLE
OH FUCK
I'M GETTING HOSED HERE 1/3/2006 1:06:14 PM |
rallydurham Suspended 11317 Posts user info edit post |
No they just made a litany of errors..
Im alright with what ive got now (although i still think they messed up the wording)
either way i can lay most of this off to assume less risk and its no big deal...
depending on the size of the bonus, this might work out well 1/3/2006 1:08:10 PM |
Lokken All American 13361 Posts user info edit post |
i swear
i just read it as
Yes means the superbowl will not feature indianapolis or seattle
no means that at least one of those teams makes the superbowl 1/3/2006 1:11:05 PM |
rallydurham Suspended 11317 Posts user info edit post |
^ yep, thats what it SHOULD mean.
They clearly made an error in the wording.
It makes me angry, because they should either honor the bet or refund the money.
But what made me really angry is that they lied to me on three separate occasions when I contacted them.
They were telling me they never said things when I had the chat transcript right in front of me.
The whole thing is shady, but at least it looks like im not getting COMPLETELY screwed. 1/3/2006 1:13:19 PM |
Jaybee1200 Suspended 56200 Posts user info edit post |
ALWAYS BET ON BLACK!
1/3/2006 1:27:50 PM |
Stein All American 19842 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "not all that double negative shit." |
Neither ... nor ... is not a double negative.
From the way the bet is worded, it should be:
Yes, neither the Colts nor the Seahawks play in the 2006 Super Bowl
or
No, either the Colts or the Seahawks will play in the 2006 Super Bowl.
Like Lokken said.
[Edited on January 3, 2006 at 2:27 PM. Reason : .]1/3/2006 2:26:36 PM |
Saddamizer Suspended 5294 Posts user info edit post |
I still got the 5 hundy on that bet, and have recieved TWO seperate confirmation emails on what exactly has to happen for for to win or lose. I'm fully confident that 1200 will be sent my way if either seattle or indy plays in detroit on febuary 5th. 1/3/2006 2:57:12 PM |
rallydurham Suspended 11317 Posts user info edit post |
^ lol, you're in a state of denial my man.
We may have come in on different ships, but we're in the same boat now.
You need the Super Bowl to be Sea vs Indy or else your ass is out $500. 1/3/2006 2:59:55 PM |