...and looks damn good i might add. you need something powerful to run this but just for image quality sake, take a look at the "water level' image comparison. the one on the left is the 2005 one and the one on the right is the new 2006 one.

http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2675&p=2

shit runs at like 10 frames per second on my 256 meg Geforce 7800 gtx

[Edited on January 23, 2006 at 1:20 AM. Reason : copy/paste issue]

1/23/2006 1:19:34 AM

i just got 2304

1/23/2006 2:38:57 AM

5844 3DMarks

1/23/2006 2:29:08 PM

Downloading now, I'm guessing I'll get between 2200 and 2400 on the total score.

1/23/2006 3:04:05 PM

10523

1/24/2006 12:33:59 AM

^lies

1/24/2006 1:28:02 AM

649

AMD 3700+ San Diego
1GB DDR400
6600GT


hehe

1/24/2006 1:40:19 AM

2700

dell 8400 3.0ghz w/ 6800gto overclocked to gt

1/24/2006 11:21:18 AM

3792

amd 64 4000+
2GB ddr400
7800GT 256mb

1/24/2006 1:52:49 PM

^ you ever have heat issues with that card in there? i dont mean the card itself but just the case in general. my overall temp went up like 5 degrees after that card was installed.

1/24/2006 1:54:40 PM

i just built the system and its the only card ever used. The card works great and i cant tell of any heat issues as of yet. the fan on the card is kinda loud but thats not to big of a deal.

1/24/2006 3:35:46 PM

haha it wont even run on my computer

1/24/2006 9:24:05 PM

3588
amd san diego 3700+
3 gb ddr
7800GT 256mb

i didn't take the time to close all my other applications so i might could get it a little higher...

1/25/2006 3:02:18 PM

Quote :

"649 1071 AMD 3700+ San Diego 1GB DDR400 6600GT "

I disabled Cool 'n Quiet and anti-virus was disabled. Interesting.

1/28/2006 2:10:38 PM

=====)


========)


===)

1/28/2006 2:19:25 PM

all I see is numbers, worthless numbers. could mean anything.

1/28/2006 2:30:51 PM

Senez: thats probably cauz it takes into account your CPU as well so disabling things in the background that use CPU cycles is probably a good idea before running this

rogueleader: thats why you go to the program's website and compare your numbers with other people's systems to see how yours stacks up. you can even use it to judge what's a good upgrading option for the future.

1/28/2006 2:45:41 PM

lol, you think a synthetic benchmark will give you a good idea how a real game will run?

these things are nothing more than e-penis competitions and have little to no reliability

take senez's results for example. are you going to disable everything running in the background everytime you want to play a game? is his PC really "faster" because he disabled that stuff?

[Edited on January 28, 2006 at 2:51 PM. Reason : ...]

1/28/2006 2:49:13 PM

my post wasn't indicative of my wanting or needing to disable everything before i play BF2. i'm just seeing what happens when I tweak stuff. after that run, i installed beta geforce drivers and OC'd a bit and boosted it 200 more marks. for me it's more about a hobby than "oh, let's see how much i can increase my fps in CoD2"

1/28/2006 3:21:55 PM

========================================================================)

1/28/2006 3:25:45 PM