Back before we took over Iraq, you sheep were all about some "but OMF N Korea & Iran are bigger threats!"

So are you going to promote an invasion this time around, or switch to some other excuse?

1/23/2006 6:55:44 PM

they will deny it b/c they just want to continue their protests and demonizing of our president

1/23/2006 6:58:25 PM

i'm not sure the "but OMF N korea & Iran are bigger threats!" people actually wanted to invade them.

they were just curious as to why Iraq needed some invading rather than the ACTUAL threats. at least i was.

1/23/2006 6:58:27 PM

this argument isn't perfect

but it definitely makes me laugh

(with you)

1/23/2006 7:01:18 PM

^^ thx for getting the spin off to a good start.

gg TGD

[Edited on January 23, 2006 at 7:01 PM. Reason : s]

1/23/2006 7:01:30 PM

i'm not spinning shit. that was my personal view. obviously i can't speak for ALL the "but OMF N Korea & Iran are bigger threats!" people.

1/23/2006 7:02:44 PM

we should just nuke their nukes ok.

1/23/2006 7:05:04 PM

WWIII

YEEEEEEEEEHAWWWWWWWWWWW

1/23/2006 7:06:02 PM

I think the prevailing view amongst "but OMF N Korea & Iran are bigger threats!" people was that invading Iraq specifically without doing other countries with more obvious threats (with people who we might want to liberate) would be hypocritical and thus there might be ulterior motives for wanting to go after Iraq specifically.

If bush just wanted oil, or just wanted to finish his daddy’s projects, or distract from the lack of finding osama then he could stop at Iraq.

With such a view, more invasion of countries in similar circumstances might actually legitimize the presidents claim that he really wants to stop such threats with force/help such peoples using force.

It wouldn’t fix things with the anti-force people, but it would fix things with the bush-has-ulterior-motives people.

---

The conservatives are pushing war with Iran right? For some reason I’ve only heard that we are taking diplomatic measures, and having serious discussions young man with Iran. I mean if the conservatives aren’t then they are flip-flopping just as much as the people TGD tried to call out at the start of this thread. So what do our local conservatives say, is it time for another war?

Infact, anyone who will answer the question please do so.

Would you vote for war with Iran right now Yes or No (yours is the deciding factor, none of this diplomatic stuff first crap and if that didn't work out then I'd say yes, you have to make a decision now).

1/23/2006 7:22:00 PM

well of course I'd say [yes], b/c I'm an evil warmongering conservative

1/23/2006 7:24:46 PM

Quote :

"Back before we took over Iraq, you sheep were all about some "but OMF N Korea & Iran are bigger threats!" So are you going to promote an invasion this time around, or switch to some other excuse?"

the first part doesnt mean they wanted to invade either of those places, just that they thought it was weird they were invading someone they didnt perceive as much of a threat. its simple logic

the second part is stupid because even if they did want to invade they would realize they cant do it anyways

in summary, you are an idiot

good day sir

1/23/2006 7:26:58 PM

Can't wait for bush to stand trial. Yay hillary! Only real politician with balls

1/23/2006 7:47:20 PM

Quote :

"RoidRaginTKE: in summary, you are an idiot good day sir"

ehe

1/23/2006 8:02:25 PM