mathman All American 1631 Posts user info edit post |
discuss. 2/11/2006 10:53:31 PM |
UJustWait84 All American 25821 Posts user info edit post |
bigger is better 2/11/2006 11:02:37 PM |
humandrive All American 18286 Posts user info edit post |
some small, some large. Really aren't there 8 or more of those things floating around? 2/11/2006 11:21:19 PM |
chembob Yankee Cowboy 27011 Posts user info edit post |
small, all of the extra ones. 2/11/2006 11:29:15 PM |
qntmfred retired 40726 Posts user info edit post |
[Edited on February 11, 2006 at 11:53 PM. Reason : .]
2/11/2006 11:53:28 PM |
hempster Suspended 2345 Posts user info edit post |
^11? I thought there were only 10. 2/12/2006 3:48:00 AM |
mathman All American 1631 Posts user info edit post |
It just occurs to me that the M-theory unification of string theory much resembles a level boss from Megaman.
I like the small dimensions as well, it easier to picture. These new large extra dimensions from the brane world models, are they supposed to fit together with the small extra dimensions... seems like two divergent lines of thought. 2/12/2006 3:51:31 AM |
mathman All American 1631 Posts user info edit post |
10 dimensional string theories are unified in the low energy limit of 11 dimensional supergravity(SUGRA). Extended solutions in SUGRA are known as branes. That's the new thing in the past decade or so, the branes allow all kinds of new model building as well as some deeper understanding of the old 10 dimensional pictures developed in the 1970-1980's. At least that's what my impression is... 2/12/2006 3:54:11 AM |
fregac All American 4731 Posts user info edit post |
2/12/2006 4:33:29 AM |
MrT All American 1336 Posts user info edit post |
string theory is mathematical masturbation 2/12/2006 12:41:02 PM |