its salisburyboy, obviously, and he's not even suspended. hes trying to make it look like there's some other guy just like him.

4/18/2006 12:18:13 AM

Seconded.

4/18/2006 12:32:39 AM

thirded

4/18/2006 2:28:55 AM

Quote :

"hes trying to make it look like there's some other guy just like him. "

well there has to be more of them, because he can't write all of those batshit crazy articles by himself can he?

4/18/2006 2:46:38 AM

1. PinkandBlack
2. spookyjon
3. synapse
4. mbutler74
5. 3 of 11

4/18/2006 9:33:53 AM

Also because he's dumb as a brick: http://www.thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=399998

4/18/2006 10:35:57 AM

Quote :

"because he can't write all of those batshit crazy articles by himself can he?"

An interesting question.

4/18/2006 1:00:52 PM

OMG MAYBE ITS ALEX JONES!

4/18/2006 4:02:04 PM

Salisburyboy has a special niche… if anyone else makes equally “valid” conspiracy claims as his in all caps they get locked down pretty fast. I thought it was permitted for Salisburboy b/c his Caucasians are the real jews (chosen of god) therefore jews & blacks aren’t as good as us religious justification for racism had a special kind of quirky endearing touch to the soapbox.
We don’t permit crazy of most types. I had thought it was we don’t permit crazy of any type but make an exception for 1 person. But if we let a 2nd person get away with it then it would seem like a crazy type that we allow, rather than a 1 person exception. If we start viewing an entire crazy type as acceptable, religiously justified racism, then I think that would be a bad thing for the soap box.
The consistent solutions IMO are 1) allow all kinds of crazy types, 2) continue to allow no crazy type w/ an exception for 1 person, or 3) ban all crazy types.

Religiously justified racism just doesn’t seem like the 1 allowable type of crazy we should have around.

4/18/2006 5:12:27 PM

THABIGL: one crazy person who was suspended forever

why does salisbury get to stay as opposed to him? is he special crazy?

4/18/2006 5:25:50 PM

Because he was the original innovator.

4/18/2006 10:41:31 PM

id take 5 salisburys to get rid of thebigl

4/19/2006 11:45:23 AM

Why are you all so afraid to see the truth?

4/19/2006 11:52:39 AM

why did you get another user name?

4/19/2006 12:42:54 PM

This is his name from PIC, apparently.

And I'm afraid of the truth because I'm a zionist, freemason Jew who works in the NSA.

4/19/2006 1:00:23 PM

WE ARE IN CONTROL!

4/19/2006 1:08:37 PM

for the love of god, he's switching back and forth between the names

can him now

4/19/2006 2:23:29 PM

i dont know why people think they are the same person

their posts are done in different formats
they are saying different things
they dont respond to questions posed to the other user as if it was adressed to them

OH WAIT

why do we allow salisburyboy let alone his alias? would we allow a follower of david duke? these are called standards. im all for free speech, but advocating the destruction of a people is over the top.

4/19/2006 4:51:20 PM

http://www.thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=403170

4/22/2006 11:24:26 PM

In that thread it appears that I am not the only one that acknowledges the truth. Skokian agrees with me.

4/23/2006 9:45:09 AM

overthrower/salisburybot you are a piece of shit.
i dont know why your bullshit is put up with.

4/23/2006 12:25:53 PM

Allow me defend myself here.

"overthrower" is NOT me. It is clearly someone trying to impersonate and/or parody me. If you actually read the posts by this "overthrower", that becomes obvious. The posts present a caricature of the arguments I would present...the purpose being to mock my own views. Also, if you examine the post record for "overthrower", you will see that this user frequently posts in Chit Chat, which I do not do. This further demonstrates that "overthrower" is not me.

And I strongly suspect that many of those claiming that "overthrower" is me know that isn't the case....but are making the claim in the hopes of trying to get me suspended again.

I've already made this clear to theDuke866 (soap box moderator), and he (as anyone else who reads the stuff in the soap box), knows (or at least strongly suspects) that this "overthrower" is not my alias. So I'm not worried about this "overthrower" suceeding in trying to get me suspended.

And I FULLY AGREE with the purpose of this thread. Suspend "overthrower"


[Edited on April 24, 2006 at 11:48 AM. Reason : ```````]

4/24/2006 11:42:17 AM

why do you want this person suspended

ARE YOU NOW TRYING TO SILENCE SOMEONE????

4/24/2006 12:09:44 PM

why did you create the alias "overthrower", Woodfoot?

yet another desperate attempt to try to get me suspended?

4/24/2006 12:28:23 PM

u have no proof he created the name or that it's him. but let the unfounded accusations fly!

4/24/2006 12:41:55 PM

Quote :

"u have no proof he created the name or that it's him"

see the comments on page 19 of this thread here:

http://www.thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=398061&page=19

Notice where Woodfoot bumped the thread after it had not been posted in for almost 2 full days (ie, see post from 4/23/2006 12:02:31 PM).

Then notice spöokyjon's response to Woodfoot's bump:

Quote :

""It would be funnier if you bumped it as overthrower."

Also notice this comment (near bottom of page)...

Quote :

"Waluigi: "and im pretty sure overthrower is mr joshua or jonhguth."

[Edited on April 24, 2006 at 12:49 PM. Reason : ```]

4/24/2006 12:48:27 PM

how would i know? im just guessing here.

4/24/2006 12:53:29 PM

hahaahaha

its funny now that he is blatantly saying its me

and using a joke as his "evidence"

then again all of his "evidence" is a joke

if anything, this is the first time the overthrower alias has been truly effective
(its not mine btw)

this was a nice gift to come back to

4/24/2006 1:29:32 PM

I am not surprised that you all are trying to silence me.

4/24/2006 1:29:36 PM

gg

4/24/2006 1:31:44 PM

if they arent the same person, the parody is actually less annoying than the original
so suspend the original

4/24/2006 3:58:36 PM

overthrower
Veteran
102 Posts
user info
edit post

spöokyjon just said that Woodfoot was overthrower

[Edited on April 24, 2006 at 10:21 AM. Reason : .]



why would woodfoot be so adamant to prove he wasnt salisburybot and was woodfoot? wouldnt he just ignore this in the hope that no one noticed if it was him?

4/24/2006 5:33:39 PM

HEY

SPOOKYJON IS A CREDIBLE SOURCE

MUCH MORE CREDIBLE THAN YOUR MSM

4/24/2006 7:47:32 PM

Quote :

"ARE YOU NOW TRYING TO SILENCE SOMEONE????"

haha

4/27/2006 3:50:04 PM

I would just like to point out that snowman is suspended

and this cuntstain isn't.

4/29/2006 12:49:49 PM