what all are they? been doing 2 mile runs about 3-4 times a week lately.

7/6/2006 5:19:54 PM

get in better shape.

7/6/2006 5:21:06 PM

You get to brag about doing 2 mile runs 3-4 times a week.

[Edited on July 6, 2006 at 5:22 PM. Reason : sp.]

7/6/2006 5:21:40 PM

getting hit by a truck running in in the reverse direction

hint hint

7/6/2006 5:22:00 PM

better heart and lung condition, body fat reduction... to a point... then it's just maintenance

7/6/2006 5:30:35 PM

exploding knees

7/6/2006 5:31:51 PM

THE KID SNIFFS COKE OK

LETS KEEP THAT IN MIND, HES PROBABLY NOT RUNNING EVERYDAY FOR HIS HEALTH, NO SIREE

[Edited on July 6, 2006 at 5:33 PM. Reason : f]

7/6/2006 5:33:12 PM

LEN BIAS

7/6/2006 5:33:36 PM

anybody that has a serious post that deals with the thread topic in one of this guys threads is either a complete idiot or brand new to the site

[Edited on July 6, 2006 at 5:41 PM. Reason : a]

7/6/2006 5:41:02 PM

its the best way to lose weight according to most articles ive read.

ideally 30 minutes 5-7 times a week is what you aim for. 60 minutes 5-7 days a week if you want to go all out.

i hit 2 miles every afternoon (5 days a week). its not 30 minutes but ill wait till its not 95 with 99% humidity before I push it too much more.

[Edited on July 6, 2006 at 5:45 PM. Reason : ^or brand new to the topic]

7/6/2006 5:45:27 PM

i love running because it not only keeps me in shape but it's also stress relief.

and 2 miles isn't anything to brag about.

7/6/2006 5:57:34 PM

u aint hardcore unless you run 15 miles a day

7/6/2006 5:58:29 PM

i do 18 miles per week but you wouldnt see my brag about that for a second. its barely enough.

7/6/2006 5:59:42 PM

barely enough for what?

7/6/2006 6:27:28 PM

you loose weigh,t gain endurance, build tone, and kill your knees

7/6/2006 6:29:47 PM

i do 2 miles with lifting weights regularly also. trying to cut my body fat percentage down. i'm at 12.8% right now.

7/6/2006 6:30:00 PM

Do you not remember when you make these threads a few weeks ago? We are fully aware that you are a fat ass and can't lose weight. Stop making the same thread.

7/6/2006 6:32:41 PM

Quote :

"barely enough for what?"

results

7/6/2006 6:36:21 PM

well i dont know what kind of results YOU'RE looking for, shoot.

7/6/2006 6:39:07 PM

Yea, what results? You don't need to run that much if you have a good diet.

7/6/2006 6:46:10 PM

~35-40 per week, actually about to go right now

7/6/2006 6:48:13 PM

12.8% body fat is not a fatty, G.


stop being a VAG.

7/6/2006 7:08:29 PM

Quote :

"i do 18 miles per week but you wouldnt see my brag about that for a second. its barely enough."

I wanna know what kind of fuckin results...

7/6/2006 7:14:11 PM

this thread sucks almost as much Amsterdam718's mom

7/6/2006 7:22:54 PM

Quote :

"i do 18 miles per week but you wouldnt see my brag about that for a second. its barely enough"

you must be doing everything else completely wrong, then.

7/6/2006 7:27:16 PM

Quote :

"i do 18 miles per week but you wouldnt see my brag about that for a second. its barely enough."

You either eat like an offensive lineman, have one of the worst metabolisms ever (or a thyroid problem), or you're training for a marathon.....or you're dumb.

7/6/2006 7:32:48 PM

Quote :

"You get to brag about doing 2 mile runs 3-4 times a week."

thats not any different from anything else he does on here

it is pretty pathetic to come on tww and brag all the time, especially when no one believes you

7/6/2006 7:40:06 PM

Quote :

"You either eat like an offensive lineman, have one of the worst metabolisms ever (or a thyroid problem), or you're training for a marathon"

yea i have a fairly slow metabolism.

when i speak of results, im not just speaking of weight loss. my goal is to be very fit. though i am not training for anything. some people simply desire to be very cardiovasculary fit. i hardly think this is anything abnormal for a regular person, its not like i do any more then 6m in one session. i run 50mins 3x a week. thats not training for marathon, thats far from it.

Quote :

"you must be doing everything else completely wrong, then."

telling people that 50mins of running 3x a week is 'wrong' or bad is complete misinformation. the idea that this amount of running is over doing it is complete bullshit. many studies have shown that only after 60mins of real excersize does your testosterone levels drop, and muscle catabolism begin to occur.


but congrats to jbrick83
all you people get that? 50mins of running 3x a week MAKES YOU DUMB. what makes you smart is not doing excersize. thats quite smart. fitness threads and misinformation are married.


[Edited on July 6, 2006 at 8:02 PM. Reason : 354]

7/6/2006 7:49:27 PM

^ who said that running 3x a week for 50 min is wrong or bad?

[Edited on July 6, 2006 at 8:02 PM. Reason : cause you said it in response to my quote]

7/6/2006 8:01:50 PM

you did

Quote :

"you must be doing everything else completely wrong, then."

[Edited on July 6, 2006 at 8:03 PM. Reason : 1234]

7/6/2006 8:02:39 PM

do you know the fucking meaning of 'every thing else' in that sentence?

[Edited on July 6, 2006 at 8:03 PM. Reason : *]

because if ANYTHING that sentence implies that the running that youre doing is the ONLY thing youre doing correctly



[Edited on July 6, 2006 at 8:04 PM. Reason : *]

7/6/2006 8:03:19 PM

Quote :

"you must be doing everything else completely wrong, then."

you are implying that its not needed.

Quote :

"because if ANYTHING that sentence implies that the running that youre doing is the ONLY thing youre doing correctly"

what do you base that on? what you read in GQ?

[Edited on July 6, 2006 at 8:04 PM. Reason : 243]

7/6/2006 8:04:17 PM

i base it on the english language.

if youre running that much and getting no results then you must be doing everything else wrong.

the retarded implication was from you to infer that for some reason i meant that if you didnt run that much you would get better results

7/6/2006 8:05:50 PM

Quote :

"if youre running that much and getting no results "

english.

Quote :

"its barely enough."

i never said no results.

and just so you know, people that have been running for a long time need to increase their speed and distance to get better results. look up basic cardiovascular training. six miles may seem like a lot to you, but thats becuase you dont run six miles as often as me. do you understsand that?

I could easily be 100x more fit and lean then you, but that doesnt mean I can keep doing to the same workout and see the results I want. This is basic basic stuff. Like i said, there is so much misinformation here from people who dont jack about fitness.


[Edited on July 6, 2006 at 8:13 PM. Reason : uiopuip]

7/6/2006 8:07:24 PM

its funny how thats really simple

but understanding my comment was completely out of your grasp

7/6/2006 8:13:42 PM

I understood it, you simply dont understand basic concepts of fitness. What seems like a lot to YOUR body, isnt shit to other people.

Do you understand now? Or do I have to keep explaining?

7/6/2006 8:15:20 PM

i understand exactly how cardio exercise scales

you somehow thought i was implying that running the amount you were was not needed, or somehow that my comment had anything to do with your running, when it didnt.

keep talking about shit everyone already knows about to try to bury your idiocy. its working.

7/6/2006 8:17:23 PM

it is 75% diet, 25% actual activity.

7/6/2006 8:17:30 PM

Quote :

"i understand exactly how cardio exercise scales "

your words say otherwise. you said someone would have to be doing everything else wrong to barely see cardiovascular results from 6 miles/3x a week. that means you simply dont understand how your body/VO2max/heart/muscles change when you excersize. Keep backpedaling.





[Edited on July 6, 2006 at 8:21 PM. Reason : rty]

7/6/2006 8:19:03 PM

actually, again youre wrong. i said nothing in response to 6 miles a day 3x a week.

I responded to

Quote :

"i do 18 miles per week but you wouldnt see my brag about that for a second. its barely enough"

granted, i thought like most of the others in here you were running primarily for weight loss, not an extreme level of fitness, so i took it as you were running every day. 18 miles wouldnt be that much for a week.

regardless, nowhere in my statement

Quote :

" "you must be doing everything else completely wrong, then." "

do i imply that running 18 miles a week is bad or wrong like you stated.

^ i never said one fucking thing about 6 miles 3x a week fuckstick. for someone who knows so much about cardio fitness, you sure dont seem to grasp the difference between 3 miles a day vs 6 miles 3 times a week

[Edited on July 6, 2006 at 8:25 PM. Reason : *]

7/6/2006 8:24:11 PM

Quote :

"granted, i thought like most of the others in here you were running primarily for weight loss, not an extreme level of fitness, so i took it as you were running every day. 18 miles wouldnt be that much for a week."

exactly. YOU ASSUMED that my #1 goal was fat loss. i never said it was, and its not.

7/6/2006 8:26:14 PM

^ thats fine

i went along with the theme of the thread. so sorry.

still working on an excuse for your retarded fucking inference from my statement? and also your incorrect assumtion that i was talking about 3x 6miles vs 3miles/day?

thought not.

7/6/2006 8:28:53 PM

you lot have too much angst

7/6/2006 8:59:28 PM

fucked up knees

7/6/2006 9:14:36 PM

Quote :

"u aint hardcore unless you run 15 miles a day"

You're not hardcore unless you run 15 miles a day in full battle rattle with a 55-lb ruck.

7/6/2006 10:07:57 PM

Quote :

"Amsterdam718 All American 7090 Posts user info edit post 12.8% body fat is not a fatty, G. stop being a VAG."

Keep telling yourself that chubby. Why the hell did you make the thread if it isn't fatty? When are you going to stop posting man? Make it soon, please!

7/6/2006 10:16:02 PM

Threads like this is where comes in handy. Look that shit up instead of attention whoring "Oh look at me, I run and you don't".

Are you going to inform us when your next bowel movement is too?

7/6/2006 10:17:33 PM

Yay...I was right. Slow metabolism.

6 miles, 3 times a week is pretty good. I wouldn't usually qualify that as barely enough, but if you have a pretty slow metabolism, then it might just be. I'd like to do 6 miles a session. I just can't pace myself. I try to do it for a mile, then I just get bored and run faster. After 3 miles I'm beat. I'm in good shape though, so I don't need to run more...but I've always wanted to go out and smoke a 10K. Maybe one day.

7/6/2006 10:19:07 PM

iyea resisting the urge to really run is hard, so i always have good music, and sprint the last 2 miles

7/6/2006 10:24:29 PM

^ resisting the urge to NOT run is hard. Running keeps the gut off and wakes me up for work in the morning. I ran three miles during my lunch hour and paid the price. 95 degrees in the hot South Florida sun and humidity in the worst part of the day is NOT a good idea.

Quote :

"but I've always wanted to go out and smoke a 10K."

How about smoking AFTER the 10K? 15 minutes after she finished with a decent time, I saw some lady light up a Virginia Slim right after completing one down here.

7/6/2006 10:46:41 PM