lets start here: http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/5/14/161152.shtml

and here: http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3ae1c76f63fd.htm

and here: http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=11548

ill save more for later.

Global Warming is a myth based on loose science that liberals and socialists (really the same thing) use to further an anti-capitalist agenda and further restrict american industry more than they already have. who is the real danger to our planet, now?

9/17/2006 8:29:50 AM

I like this kid.

9/17/2006 9:16:47 AM

not to say that global warming is def. true.... but i read the first two articles and both were full of some crappy stuff but the second made me straight go GOOD GOD!!!!!... There is better evidence out there than that for anti-global warming. Do yourself a favor and use it. your gonna lose alot of ground starting with those...

9/17/2006 9:36:57 AM

holla at your NewsMax

9/17/2006 11:12:05 AM

Reasons why "Global Warming" is true:

http://www.moveon.org/forum=1/holycrap

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/news/BigGirl

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/blog/youre

http://www.michaelmoore.com/archives/retarded





[Edited on September 17, 2006 at 11:37 AM. Reason : .]

9/17/2006 11:36:31 AM

it took me a bit to realize those were fake links and not stuff you actually believe are true. just goes to show how you portray yourself on here.

someone tell me what is wrong with newsmax again?

9/17/2006 11:42:37 AM

What's wrong with my links?

9/17/2006 11:44:19 AM

your links provide trolling

my links provide discussion and evidence

9/17/2006 11:46:55 AM

o rly?

Let me find you a Greenpeace article to counter your evidence...

[Edited on September 17, 2006 at 12:00 PM. Reason : .]

9/17/2006 11:59:33 AM

Haha, gg boonedocks

9/17/2006 1:02:16 PM

I like where the 2nd article descibes the "myth" of global warming as a plot by the evil reds to abolish private property.

9/17/2006 1:32:03 PM

Randy, you are a god damn idiot

9/17/2006 2:38:01 PM

perhaps saving the human race from extinction is not something capitalism can solve

9/17/2006 2:43:37 PM

Do you honestly and truely believe that global warming was made up by people simply to restrict the american economy? I just don't understand how anybody with a rational mind can believe something so incredibly rediculous. Especially given that the scientific community is virtually united on the issue but somewhat wavers on the amount of human contribution.

People work on global warming because they honestly believe it could be a threat to human life. Not because they want the fucking government to throw money at people. Pull your head out of your ass.

9/17/2006 3:46:06 PM

we're so fucked

9/17/2006 4:15:23 PM

Party line Republicans

9/17/2006 5:04:35 PM

Randy just displays his ignorance more and more every time he creates a new thread. As bad as I thought it was before with some of his threads, this takes the cake. How are you gonna make it sound like CONFIRMED evidence by scientists in basically every developed nation in the world showing that global warming is taking place is a giant conspiracy to hold down the American economy?

9/17/2006 6:17:13 PM

Randy may be referring to the Kyoto Protocol. Developing countries, notably China, are not subject to thre treaty's emissions reductions requirements, whereas the United States would be. Emissions controls cost significant amounts of money. The fact that developing countries would not be subject to the costs of emission controls would give them a significant manufacturing advantage.

9/17/2006 6:40:50 PM

Randy = ......who's randy again?


doesn't matter really, you're a fucking idiot

9/17/2006 6:44:52 PM

Randy = the big girl

9/17/2006 7:01:23 PM

I thought the arguement was what was causing Global Warming not that it didnt exist.

and newsmax is the heat!

9/17/2006 7:50:24 PM

newsmax lol

Quote :

"NewsMax Media is a news organization founded by journalist Christopher Ruddy and based in West Palm Beach, Florida. It runs the NewsMax.com website and publishes NewsMax Magazine. Ruddy, who serves as editor-in-chief, bills NewsMax.com as "the leading online news site with a conservative perspective."

Yee haw! I only find news that I agree with! Truth be damned!

[Edited on September 17, 2006 at 8:25 PM. Reason : .]

9/17/2006 8:18:44 PM

and this is coming from people who assuredly get news and perspective from sources like the new york times

9/17/2006 8:33:25 PM

Randy is a n00b

9/17/2006 8:33:42 PM

^^

hahahaha

YOU CAN NOT TRUST ANYONE!

ONLY NEWSMAX BECAUSE THEY LIKE LOVE JESUS AND STUFF!

9/17/2006 8:34:29 PM

Randy must be one of those idiots who gets his news from The 700 Club

9/17/2006 8:37:36 PM

ha

9/17/2006 8:40:07 PM

YOU CANT TRUST FOX OR NEWSMAX OR THE NY POST, THEY ARE A PART OF TEH RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY! I ONLY TRUST CNN AND THE NY TIMES!

9/17/2006 8:53:08 PM

There's significantly more evidence in scientific journals of all types that global climate change is real. It's nothing short of blatant stupidity to think otherwise.

As was mentioned earlier though, what is a bit more disputable is how much of it is anthropogenic, and on what timeline are the changes occurring. Increasingly more studies show that humans are playing a big factor.

9/17/2006 8:56:48 PM

hahaha newsmax

but I have no problem with Fox and the Post because they're not some dude in a cabins blog.

haha and if you think CNN is liberal you're idea of a centrist must be someone who only kinda hates abortion

[Edited on September 17, 2006 at 8:59 PM. Reason : !]

9/17/2006 8:57:24 PM

i get my news from stormfront

they say the jews made up global warming

9/17/2006 8:57:38 PM

Did any of us say we read the NY Times?


Even if we did, at least it is widely read enough that there is some fact checking and oversight by the public.

[Edited on September 17, 2006 at 8:59 PM. Reason : .]

9/17/2006 8:59:10 PM

WHO BASES SCIENTIFIC OPINION OFF OF ANY NEWS STATION

dumbass

9/17/2006 8:59:40 PM

I read the NY Times

Show me where the actual news has been been consistently biased (not Op-Ed). In fact, if there's been any bias it was giving the President the benefit of the doubt over the case for war when they should have been investigating every assumption he made.

Plus, I don't know how you take any news service seriously if it doesn't do any actual investigative reporting.

You have Fox, which is just a 24/7 regurgitator of AP reports, and Newsmax, which is a glorified blog.

[Edited on September 17, 2006 at 9:06 PM. Reason : .]

9/17/2006 9:00:45 PM

and you talk like newsmax just makes things up. they get their data from scientists, just like everyone else. i suggest you read it and make your own judgements. they did a whole issue specifically on debunking "an inconvenient truth". you should really pick it up sometime.

9/17/2006 9:05:35 PM

I think its funny that he reads only conservative news outlets, and then blasts other mediums as being liberally biased.

So at the very least, he is committing the same error. Perhaps he should remember that the so called "liberal" media was as equally critical of Clinton that it is of Bush.

9/17/2006 9:07:24 PM

are you trying to claim there is no liberal bias in the news media?

rofl

9/17/2006 9:08:34 PM

Newsmax: "Scientists Debunk 'Fairy Tale' of 'Global Warming'"

Reality: A handful of unknown scientists who don't agree with global warming did lunch. Meanwhile the scientific community didn't give a crap.

9/17/2006 9:09:31 PM

Haha NewsMax

Yeah I am going to trust my world view to some right wing nut job in Florida at a Post Office Box.

Hell, I have a post office box. He could be running that thing out of his apartment for all I know.

Quote :

"NewsMax Media Inc. PO Box 20989 West Palm Beach, FL 33416 US Domain Name: NEWSMAX.COM Administrative Contact: Bill Pike domains@newsmax.com NewsMax Media Inc. PO Box 20989 West Palm Beach, FL 33416 US Phone: 5616861165 Fax: 5616863350 Technical Contact: Bill Pike domains@newsmax.com NewsMax Media Inc. PO Box 20989 West Palm Beach, FL 33416 US Phone: 5616861165 Fax: 5616863350 Billing Contact: Bill Pike domains@newsmax.com NewsMax Media Inc. PO Box 20989 West Palm Beach, FL 33416 US Phone: 5616861165 Fax: 5616863350"

9/17/2006 9:11:30 PM

I'll give you a hint, the truth is irrespective of politics. Just because the news shows how ignorant and incompetent Republicans are doesn't mean its inaccurate. They are the the ones who keep getting thrown in prison for corruption ya know.

Media acts as an agent for accountability in government. If you just want to sit in your trailer, firmly believing that conservatives are infallible, then thats your incredibly narrow minded and ignorant right.

[Edited on September 17, 2006 at 9:19 PM. Reason : .]

9/17/2006 9:17:23 PM

^^^^yes actually, that is what we are trying to say

[Edited on September 17, 2006 at 9:19 PM. Reason : .]

9/17/2006 9:19:12 PM

hahaha. you dont think the media skews things with a liberal bias?

how come we hear nothing good from iraq, when good things are happening in MANY areas?

how come we see photographs of Israeli atrocities but we dont see nearly as much about Hezbollah's atrocities?

how come any news that surfaces about saddam's reign of terror in iraq, his trial and the further revelations about his atrocities against the kurds, is relegated to the back pages or is only reported by a select few outlets (which im sure you would all dub "conservatively biased bs sources")?

9/17/2006 9:21:09 PM

"80 people die in sectarian violence" is a weeeee bit more relevant to current events than "kids recieve candy from friendly U.S. soldiers"

[Edited on September 17, 2006 at 9:30 PM. Reason : .]

9/17/2006 9:25:17 PM

Quote :

"how come we hear nothing good from iraq, when good things are happening in MANY areas?"

Because good news doesn't sell newspapers. Sucks but its that way regardless of administration.

Quote :

" how come we see photographs of Israeli atrocities but we dont see nearly as much about Hezbollah's atrocities?"

Because we expect the Israelis to be civilized. We know Hezbollah are terrorists.

Quote :

" how come any news that surfaces about saddam's reign of terror in iraq, his trial and the further revelations about his atrocities against the kurds, is relegated to the back pages or is only reported by a select few outlets (which im sure you would all dub "conservatively biased bs sources")?"

They often make it somewhere near the front, but the trial has been going on since July 2004. The daily workings of the trial are not front page news.

9/17/2006 9:26:44 PM

scuba hit that on the head

9/17/2006 9:49:10 PM

new evidence linking saddam to the training of al-quaeda forces in afghanistan surfaced recently, did you hear?

9/17/2006 9:53:32 PM

you do know that showing bad stuff in Iraq increases news viewership and make news stations shit loads of money.

its capitalism and you hate it.

9/17/2006 9:55:07 PM

dont underestimate the "silent majority"

how often have they even tried reporting the good things to see if it will take ahold of the market?

9/17/2006 9:56:03 PM

i am telling you. bill clinton is in your closet and you need to check it right now.

9/17/2006 9:57:28 PM

^^

Fox the "conservative outlet" still reports all of the bad things

why?

because they want to make money

9/17/2006 10:37:12 PM