i've seen people with those wall-size pictures that were just enlarged from regular-size pictures, anyone know of a good program or what this is called or anything

9/27/2006 1:12:01 AM

rasterbato

http://homokaasu.org/rasterbator/

9/27/2006 1:16:24 AM

wow awesome....adding that to my bookmarks

9/27/2006 2:07:49 AM

same here
phat site

9/27/2006 2:17:35 AM

take your negatives to any print shop and they'll handle it

9/27/2006 2:58:01 AM

^not if its digital.

9/27/2006 9:24:55 AM

Quote :

"take your negatives"

i think that effectively implies that it's not digital...

9/27/2006 11:12:42 AM

Quote :

"^not if it's digital"

what a dumbass response

9/27/2006 8:26:03 PM

yeah? well i don't keep digital negatives...only RAW and the jpg after i process the image

9/27/2006 8:32:16 PM

Jesus Christ.

9/27/2006 8:38:03 PM

^^you should start keeping them!!!!!!!!!

9/27/2006 9:23:51 PM

i don't format my RAW images into digital negatives, so there really isn't anything to keep.

9/27/2006 9:57:03 PM

9/27/2006 10:03:49 PM

^^ just shutup

9/27/2006 10:20:48 PM

yes, there is a such thing as a Digital Negative.
but its just a type of way a raw digital photo is compressed so when you talk digital nobody every really calls them "negatives" because they are all files... no matter the format.

i hear rasterbator is pretty good. i don't know if you mean scanning a photo... or actually taking the negative or digital file.

and how big is wallsize. because when i hear wall size i think a poster... but it could also be WALL SIZED.

9/27/2006 10:29:48 PM

^i made one out of a <1mb photo just for fun on their website.. i set it moderately large.

the output was over 110 pages of 8.5"x11" paper which as you can imagine is probably wallsize

9/27/2006 11:31:33 PM

that is large

9/27/2006 11:38:06 PM

I rasterbated this:



In black and white, sadly, but it'd better than nothing. It's above our TV in the living room.

9/28/2006 12:28:09 AM

Quote :

"i don't format my RAW images into digital negatives, so there really isn't anything to keep."

i think it's pretty silly to keep RAW images but not put them into the DNG format...yes, it's currently an adobe-only supported format, but it's literally half the size (for me), you lose no data, and the converter (for putting it into DNG format and putting it back into RAW) is completely free

if you do your editing in photoshop anyway, why would you keep it in RAW?

9/28/2006 11:34:41 AM

This one is badass

9/28/2006 11:37:03 AM

Quote :

"i think it's pretty silly to keep RAW images but not put them into the DNG format...yes, it's currently an adobe-only supported format, but it's literally half the size (for me), you lose no data, and the converter (for putting it into DNG format and putting it back into RAW) is completely free if you do your editing in photoshop anyway, why would you keep it in RAW? "

i did not know that actually...so thanks for the insight

adobe lightroom converts them into DNG if you want it to so i will try using that

[Edited on September 28, 2006 at 11:43 AM. Reason : fda]

9/28/2006 11:43:31 AM

^^ that thing is sweet.. but printing it would cost a fortune

that thing is at least 128 pages (16 pages x 8 pages). in b&w printing your black ink would be gone in no time for full page printing

9/28/2006 1:35:01 PM

but in person it would look like shit if its printed on regular paper...

9/28/2006 1:36:53 PM

I'm rasterbating right now as we speak...





Haha check out this one!


[Edited on September 28, 2006 at 2:01 PM. Reason : image]

9/28/2006 1:52:09 PM

Quote :

"in b&w printing your black ink would be gone in no time for full page printing"

This is why you don't use that inkjet shit.

9/28/2006 2:44:15 PM

in case anyone cares, here's the link to the free DNG converter and RAW camera update:

http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/product.jsp?product=106&platform=Windows

9/28/2006 5:53:20 PM

this is indeed pretty sweet

9/28/2006 6:20:05 PM

Try this one. I actually like it better than the rasterbator.


http://www.posteriza.com/es/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=5&lang=en_US

9/28/2006 7:15:15 PM