theDuke866 All American 52839 Posts user info edit post |
Discuss.
How big is it in practical terms (not simply dollar amounts)?
How problematic is it? 10/20/2006 10:33:15 PM |
dbhawley All American 3339 Posts user info edit post |
what is the actual amount. i havent heard a figure in a while 10/20/2006 10:53:18 PM |
ssjamind All American 30102 Posts user info edit post |
paging LoneSnark 10/20/2006 11:05:43 PM |
LoneSnark All American 12317 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "The federal budget deficit, helped by a gusher of tax revenues, fell to $247.7 billion in 2006, the smallest amount of red ink in four years.
Both spending and tax revenues climbed to all-time highs in 2006. The sharp narrowing of the deficit reflected the fact that revenues climbed by 11.7 percent, outpacing the 7.3 percent increase in spending." |
http://www.startribune.com/535/story/735487.html http://bea.gov/bea/dn/home/gdp.htm So, all in all, taking a low-balled 2006 GDP figure of 13,197.3 billion dollars, the current deficit is running about 1.877% of GDP. In proportion to the U.S. economy this is a very responsible deficit (the national GDP is growing almost twice this fast, somewhere north of 3%).
In other words, economic prosperity cures all ails (at least for awhile).10/20/2006 11:29:57 PM |
NCSU337 All American 1098 Posts user info edit post |
I think he meant the National Debt as in the 8.5 trillion we owe.
http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/ 10/20/2006 11:47:57 PM |
LoneSnark All American 12317 Posts user info edit post |
^ Oh, right, duh.
Well, it sounds bad to say, but if you contain the deficit then you have contained the debt. While it would be good to pay some of it off at least we are making it easier for future generations to do so (GDP growth and inflation are making the debt appear smaller every year). 10/21/2006 12:03:32 AM |
CharlieEFH All American 21806 Posts user info edit post |
it'll never get paid off so why worry about it? 10/21/2006 9:53:14 AM |
e30ncsu Suspended 1879 Posts user info edit post |
Our debt is going to hurt us with North Korea if we ever have to pressure China to get their support. 10/21/2006 10:27:50 AM |
bgmims All American 5895 Posts user info edit post |
^lol, It must be fun to be able to just make those kinds of economic assertions without having to be tied down to proof or soundness. 10/21/2006 12:04:02 PM |
e30ncsu Suspended 1879 Posts user info edit post |
its a problem that lots of people have written about. heres the first google link:
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/prem/200510u/nj_schneider_2005-10-25 10/21/2006 12:14:19 PM |
trikk311 All American 2793 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Our debt is going to hurt us with North Korea if we ever have to pressure China to get their support." |
how?10/21/2006 12:16:55 PM |
JonHGuth Suspended 39171 Posts user info edit post |
haha "hey china, you better do what we say or we are going to stop borrowing so much money from you" 10/21/2006 12:21:36 PM |
bgmims All American 5895 Posts user info edit post |
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/by/william_schneider
This guy has great record of writing earth-shattering economic analysis, lol
BTW, please 2 not cite editorials. 10/21/2006 12:38:33 PM |
bgmims All American 5895 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "haha "hey china, you better do what we say or we are going to stop borrowing so much money from you"" |
Don't forget that what you see is "us borrowing money from them" is only the flip side of the coin to the trade deficit. What that means is that if they stopped buying our bonds, it would mean that we, at the same time, stop having such a large trade deficit.
If you don't see how this works, please take EC 348 or EC 448/449 or please go learn the economics of international finance. Then we can chat about how horrible the deficit is.10/21/2006 12:42:29 PM |
JonHGuth Suspended 39171 Posts user info edit post |
debt 10/21/2006 12:47:46 PM |
KeB All American 9828 Posts user info edit post |
legalize and tax it 10/22/2006 4:43:41 PM |
theDuke866 All American 52839 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Don't forget that what you see is "us borrowing money from them" is only the flip side of the coin to the trade deficit. What that means is that if they stopped buying our bonds, it would mean that we, at the same time, stop having such a large trade deficit." |
yeah, i'm not too worried about the trade deficit with China, for that very reason. in the end, they pour enough money into our securities markets that we end up coming out ahead on the deal.10/22/2006 7:37:34 PM |
Flyin Ryan All American 8224 Posts user info edit post |
http://www.itulip.com/forums/showthread.php?t=466 10/22/2006 8:06:23 PM |
LoneSnark All American 12317 Posts user info edit post |
If the Chinese threaten to dump our debt that would cause a drastic currency devaluation, rendering all those hard-earned T-Bills worthless to the Chinese. I suspect we don't have much to fear from it for this reason.
Especially when you realize why the Chinese government is creating the imbalance: They want reserves to stave off financial crises in the future. You see, a U.S. dollar crisis is easy for China to weather, they can print yuan and rescue the dollar will. However, if the yuan began collapsing China is unable to print dollars, it cannot ensure help from the IMF or the US, so it's only hope is to have a large stash of dollars readily available to fix any such eventuality.
In my opinion, however, this is in error. China is still operating under the international financial model of a small country such as Korea or Hong Kong, where wild currency fluctuation is a real threat. However, a large diverse economy such as the U.S. or China do not face such worries because sufficient domestic activity exists to swamp any international disturbances.
[Edited on October 22, 2006 at 11:46 PM. Reason : .,.] 10/22/2006 11:34:58 PM |