http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2006Dec11/0,4670,PakistanTalibanRise,00.html

this came from fox news, but it's an AP article. my question is, why is the pakistani government unable (or more likely unwilling) to exert control over the entirety of their country?

Quote :

"Report: Taliban Regrouping in Pakistan Monday, December 11, 2006 By MATTHEW PENNINGTON, Associated Press Writer ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — A peace deal between Pakistan's government and Islamic militants in the northwestern tribal region of North Waziristan has created a virtual Taliban mini-state where mullahs dispense justice and fighters are launching cross-border attacks into neighboring Afghanistan, a think tank reported Monday. The U.S. military confirmed that attacks have risen sharply since the deal was reached earlier this year despite concerns it would give a freer hand to Taliban and al-Qaida-linked militants who fled to Pakistan after the fall of the hard-line regime in Afghanistan in 2001. "Over the past five years, the (President Gen. Pervez) Musharraf government has tried first brute force, then appeasement. Both have failed," said Samina Ahmed of the International Crisis Group that published the report. "Islamabad's tactics have only emboldened the pro-Taliban militants." That grim assessment came against the backdrop of an alarming surge in violence in southern and eastern Afghanistan this year that has killed close to 4,000 people, threatening the Western-backed project to rebuild the country and establish democracy. Government policy has allowed militants "to establish a virtual mini-Taliban-style state," the Crisis Group said, citing reports of pro-Taliban militants attacking music, video and CD stores, closing barber shops, imposing taxes and establishing courts to impose summary justice. The Pakistani government rejected the Brussels-based group's report as "baseless allegations" and described the violence across the border as Afghanistan's internal problem. "There are no camps or centers where terrorists are being trained in the tribal areas," said Arbab Mohammed Arif Khan, secretary for law and order in Pakistan's semiautonomous tribal regions. Pakistan, a key U.S. anti-terror ally, has deployed about 80,000 forces at the Afghan border and launched numerous military operations against al-Qaida-linked militants in the past five years, but with mixed results. In North Waziristan, heavy-handed offensives this year left hundreds dead and stoked local anger and support for pro-Taliban religious leaders. The peace deal, inked in September after a June cease-fire, capped the fighting in Pakistan. But the Crisis Group reported "increasingly severe cross-border attacks on Afghan and international military personnel, with the support and active involvement of Pakistani militants." It said the ambivalent approach of the Musharraf government was "destabilizing Afghanistan." A senior tribal elder confirmed the Taliban had gained sway in North Waziristan. Tribesmen were bypassing the government and traditional tribal leaders and approaching their pro-Taliban leaders in the towns of Miran Shah and Mir Ali to settle land and money disputes. Religious students were even helping to direct traffic, he told The Associated Press. The elder requested anonymity because he had been threatened by militants for meeting government leaders. Access to the heavily Pashtun tribal regions, a possible hiding place for Osama bin Laden, is restricted. Foreign journalists are not permitted there unless under government or army escort, and reports of militant activities are often difficult to verify. In Afghanistan, U.S. military spokesman Lt. Col. Paul Fitzpatrick said U.S. and Afghan security posts along the eastern border with Pakistan had seen a spike in attacks from 17 in May to 50 in August and 57 in October. Most of the attacks were in Paktika province, which lies opposite North and South Waziristan. Attacks leveled off to about one a day in November, possibly because of winter weather settling in, Fitzpatrick said. He said the data were not conclusive but that the increase could have been influenced by the North Waziristan peace deal or by U.S. military operations forcing more militants to operate close to the Pakistan border. ___ Associated Press writers Jason Straziuso in Kabul, Afghanistan, and Riaz Khan in Peshawar, Pakistan, contributed to this report."

12/11/2006 4:05:31 PM

jews

my answer is jews

12/11/2006 4:08:56 PM

because the pakistani government is a bunch of bitches

12/11/2006 4:10:28 PM

it's not that their bitches, it's just that they don't care (have the same interests)

12/11/2006 4:17:16 PM

Quote :

"why is the pakistani government unable (or more likely unwilling) to exert control over the entirety of their country?"

Although I'm sure there's some degree of unwillingness, I'm not as convinced that they could control the whole country, even if they wanted to (and I suspect that Musharraf, at least, does).

The regions in question are first of all located in some of the most rugged and difficult terrain on the planet, and in that respect (as well as the nature of the people there) they are very much like Afghanistan, which nobody has ever been able to control. That part of the world isn't just difficult to govern centrally, it's damn near impossible. The only way national leaders have gotten them to at least not exist in a state of active rebellion is to give them pretty much carte blanc.

If they tried to go in and bring it into the fold, odds are they (and other dissatisfied elements) would rise up, which wouldn't really help them or us.

Really the best-case scenario for the U.S. has always been to train up the Afghanis to the point where they can keep the Taliban in check, just like the Taliban used to do with the Northern Alliance.

12/11/2006 4:37:58 PM