But they call it an EV with range extending capability

http://tinyurl.com/yz2zhs



[Edited on January 7, 2007 at 12:18 AM. Reason : pic]

1/7/2007 12:15:20 AM

Looks kinda silly.

1/7/2007 12:33:23 AM

i'd rock it

[Edited on January 7, 2007 at 1:46 AM. Reason : sill waiting for that gm fuel-cell interchangeable body drive-by wire deal]

1/7/2007 1:45:15 AM

0EPII1 alias?


[Edited on January 7, 2007 at 1:57 AM. Reason : nm]

1/7/2007 1:55:59 AM

that looks like shit

1/7/2007 2:54:26 AM

an electric vehicle with a generator . . . 640 mile range . . . barely hear the engine when it's running since only 1800 rpm

in cast you couldn't tell from the picture . . . it's a 4dr

wonder how much it's gonna cost

[Edited on January 7, 2007 at 9:45 AM. Reason : ]

1/7/2007 9:44:17 AM

I'm hoping less than $30k

1/7/2007 1:10:57 PM

i am impressed by the numbers.

1/7/2007 2:06:40 PM

i think its a great idea and somthing alot of people should really consider switching to... and you know the power companies are all about this car

1/7/2007 3:38:05 PM

i never really understood how it's more fficient to have to plug a car in when the energy is still being produced by power plants burning fossil fuels. i mean, i assume maybe it's more efficient than just straight using gasoline..but I dunno.

1/7/2007 4:02:59 PM

we need the nukes!!!!

1/7/2007 4:13:38 PM

Quote :

"i never really understood how it's more fficient to have to plug a car in when the energy is still being produced by power plants burning fossil fuels. i mean, i assume maybe it's more efficient than just straight using gasoline..but I dunno."

One would think the efficiency of power produced by a fine tuned generator would surpass that of a GM V-8.

1/7/2007 10:23:08 PM

i want a shuttlecraft

1/7/2007 10:24:46 PM

and I want a Tesla Roadster

1/8/2007 12:29:50 AM

new pic

1/8/2007 2:13:04 AM

Quote :

"the energy is still being produced by power plants burning fossil fuels"

ignorant liberals don't think things like that through. they only pay attention to what things look like on the surface.

companies, politicians, etc. realize this and take advantage.

1/8/2007 2:27:23 AM

^what an idiot. It's more efficient and cleaner for power plants to produce the energy.

Ignorant conservatives don't think things like that through. they only pay attention to what things look like on the surface.

1/8/2007 5:57:48 AM

^ Yes, it is probably more efficient. It's still not the best long term solution though. Our grid is already strained...the funny part is California is the state with all the environmental nuts who want to use cars like this, and their power grid is already a nightmare. Can you imagine if this really took off? It would be hilarious if California was finally forced to build new plants because of more "environmentally friendly" cars.

1/8/2007 8:06:44 AM

^sweet irony

1/8/2007 8:11:29 AM

well we do have like 200 years worth of coal in the US...

1/8/2007 8:20:21 AM