http://pc.ign.com/articles/788/788627p1.html

5/19/2007 2:05:59 AM

PS i only made this cuz i had a real link

5/19/2007 2:14:16 AM

The graphics are underwhelming.

but this billboard is funny.

5/19/2007 3:12:21 AM

ill still play it

5/19/2007 3:32:40 AM

IN ON PAGE ONE

5/19/2007 3:40:21 AM

REAL MEN DRILL DEEP

5/19/2007 4:50:36 AM

wow.

at least they didnt screw with it too much, it just looks like the added a few new units and tweaked the graphics...interface looks 100% the same

even so, I'm sure it wont come out until 2010 because it's blizzard

[Edited on May 19, 2007 at 5:49 AM. Reason : .]

5/19/2007 5:38:47 AM

Here is another link with a few different videos, the site is in Korean......, and it seems to take forever to get the videos to load, but the game looks very cool


http://tvpot.daum.net/theme/ThemeView.do?themeid=122&lu=m_mono_1

5/19/2007 6:11:44 AM

In on page one. By the time this comes out two years from now, I'll be good and ready.

5/19/2007 7:19:17 AM

damn that looks nice

5/19/2007 7:35:08 AM

kekekekekekekeke
zerg rush

5/19/2007 7:52:29 AM

Yeah that pretty much looks like SC1 with updated graphics

5/19/2007 8:04:49 AM

page one.

I want this game

5/19/2007 8:44:00 AM

if it ain't broke don't fix it

5/19/2007 8:52:34 AM

Man I dunno, Blizzard has always been a company that refines rather than innovates, but this almost looks lazy. Still early though, I guess we'll see.

5/19/2007 9:02:17 AM

they better not limit the number of units you can group to 12 or whatever, that shit is so annoying

5/19/2007 9:08:59 AM

meh.. command and conquer is better

5/19/2007 10:02:21 AM

Can't wait to play it. Gotta hurry up and finish Dawn of War first though.

5/19/2007 10:08:42 AM

glad it didnt turn out to be another mmorpg

5/19/2007 10:47:02 AM

Quote :

"meh.. command and conquer isn't better"

5/19/2007 11:07:19 AM

there are so many more innovative RTS' out there. If its just like Starcraft 1 its already been left behind.

5/19/2007 11:30:12 AM

page 1

not in the least bit impressed. excited that the finished product will be good though as proven in the past.

5/19/2007 11:44:10 AM

too bad it wasnt diablo 3 - would of sold more

5/19/2007 11:49:30 AM

Quote :

"if it ain't broke don't fix it"

Blizzard has yet to steer me wrong.

Starcraft!

5/19/2007 12:31:55 PM

5/19/2007 1:08:45 PM

Quote :

"there are so many more innovative RTS' out there. If its just like Starcraft 1 its already been left behind. "

!= why people love starcraft.

Hell I STILL play it, and I'm terrible at it. And I hate RTS games. And it's still fun as fucking hell

5/19/2007 1:13:05 PM

5/19/2007 1:50:15 PM

^^i never really got into starcraft myself. Dunno why. I've always been more of a realism RTS player...either something in modern era or historic era...but non of that alien shit lol

5/19/2007 3:14:33 PM

page 1

5/19/2007 3:31:40 PM

page 1

w00t!

5/19/2007 3:46:34 PM

At least the chinks will be happy for 10 years so Blizz has time to develop a couple of games that are actually appealing to the rest of the world

5/19/2007 4:17:40 PM

bout damn time

5/19/2007 4:35:49 PM

no point on getting on page 1 if you can't edit after 30 minutes

5/19/2007 5:02:55 PM

oh yeah,

page 1

5/19/2007 5:16:10 PM

so which thread is the official official thread?

5/19/2007 6:02:45 PM

anyone watch the HD cinematic video posted on fileplanet? awesome! got me pumped for this.

I also hope they port this to Xbox360 like C&C3. I would have thought RTS' on consoles would really suck but the controls were so easy and simple that I actually enjoyed it more than on the PC.

[Edited on May 19, 2007 at 6:16 PM. Reason : fda]

5/19/2007 6:12:07 PM

Quote :

"StarCraft II -- Not For Consoles Thanks for spoiling everything, StarCraft Ghost... This game is exclusive to PC and Mac. by Nix May 19, 2007 - With games like Command & Conquer 3 and Tom Clancy's EndWar finally bringing the Realtime Strategy (RTS) genre to consoles with due success, there was some hope when rumors started flying about a sequel to StarCraft that the game might follow the trend and come to consoles along with a PC version. Sadly (for console-only gamers, at least), Blizzard has officially dashed those hopes for the time being."

5/19/2007 6:36:40 PM

any reason behind it? besides, we don't know how to?

5/19/2007 6:53:05 PM

I'm just waiting for Diablo 3.

5/19/2007 6:56:09 PM

Quote :

"page one. I want this game"

5/19/2007 7:12:10 PM

in on page 1.

5/19/2007 7:19:40 PM

http://www.starcraft2.com

I retract my previous statement, Blizzard is just too good at this shit. They could take a dump in a box and I'd buy the collectors edition.

5/19/2007 8:13:28 PM

page 1, in i am

5/19/2007 8:28:46 PM

^^that is why they will sell a crap ton of copies even if it sucks

5/19/2007 8:53:04 PM

page 1 goodness.

5/19/2007 8:53:15 PM

Need more Vespane gas on page 1.

5/19/2007 9:37:55 PM

I was a little turned off by the screenshots, but the animations look really good from what I have seen. And the CG movie is great as always.

Who's this Tychus Findlay guy? Was he in the original?

5/19/2007 9:40:01 PM

CARRIER HAS ARRIVED.

5/19/2007 10:45:41 PM

id be more excited if i didnt completely blow at rts games. my friends and i played blizzard games nonstop in highschool, but i was always by far the shittiest. still was fun.

5/19/2007 11:00:01 PM

Is Battle.net a thing of the past? I vaguely remember hearing something about it a while back. I am curious as to how SC2 is going to do multiplayer/online gaming.

5/19/2007 11:11:36 PM