User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » can't believe this article i just read Page [1]  
graz
All American
1834 Posts
user info
edit post

http://www.newsobserver.com/105/story/579578.html

A kids dad bought this beautiful 1979 trans am with 26k miles on it and drove it a total of 30 miles in the year he's owned it. He decides to give it to his 16 yr old son for his first car. Well, the moron of a son he has decides he
Quote :
"doesn't like the idea of driving an older original car"
so the dad put it up for auction at a classic car show at the fair grounds and sold it for $25k.

I can't believe this kid.

5/25/2007 12:19:43 PM

Golovko
All American
27023 Posts
user info
edit post

I would have done the same thing. I don't like trans am's no matter what year they came from. I do appreciate classics though, just not that one. 67 Mustang would have been my choice, or a charger

5/25/2007 12:27:46 PM

sd2nc
All American
9963 Posts
user info
edit post

well hopefully dad invests that money in a new Chevy Aveo or Kia Rio so his kid is happy

5/25/2007 12:33:40 PM

Golovko
All American
27023 Posts
user info
edit post

or a bicycle and invest the rest of the money in stocks or bonds, or a ING/HSBC savings account

the kid is going to total his first car anyway if not kill himself and others sometime in his high school career.

5/25/2007 12:34:47 PM

Skack
All American
31140 Posts
user info
edit post

When I was 16 gas was $1.00 or less and my car averaged 20MPG. I don't know how I could have afforded $3.00/gallon gas on a 10MPG car.
I'd say the kid's life will be much better off if he's rocking an Accord instead.

5/25/2007 1:12:19 PM

danmangt40
All American
2349 Posts
user info
edit post

I don't really like the '79 anyway

I know, I know... bandit and all that...

5/25/2007 2:43:01 PM

SandSanta
All American
22435 Posts
user info
edit post

I'd love to drive that car.

5/25/2007 2:46:42 PM

richthofen
All American
15758 Posts
user info
edit post

Damn, I love the Trans Am too. I think MiniMe_877 had one a while back, not sure if it was a '79 or not though.

My impulse is to think the kid is crazy...however, having a 300+hp, 27k mile, pristine original as your first car would be pretty intimidating. I'd be scared as all hell to even scratch it. But I wouldn't turn it down either!

[Edited on May 25, 2007 at 5:34 PM. Reason : d]

5/25/2007 5:33:52 PM

Noen
All American
31346 Posts
user info
edit post

I love how none of you even read the whole article, even the original poster:

Quote :
"He set the reserve on the car at $18,500, and showed up at the sale Saturday feeling good about his chances of turning a buck. So good, apparently, that before his car made it to auction, Sr. spent $5,800 on a '75 Chevy Vega and $26,250 for a completely rebuilt '67 Ford Mustang for Jr. to drive."


The kid ended up with a '67 For Mustang. HOW THE FUCK do you go from a 79 transam to a 67 mustang when you "dont like the idea of driving an older car"

5/25/2007 6:59:20 PM

optmusprimer
All American
30318 Posts
user info
edit post

reading comprehension here folks

Quote :
"doesn't like the idea of driving an older original car"

5/25/2007 7:31:04 PM

69
Suspended
15861 Posts
user info
edit post

the hell if i'd drive a concours correct one either, same deal with my 66 stang, it's a muscle car, i'm gonna build it for power, not show

5/25/2007 7:44:24 PM

Golovko
All American
27023 Posts
user info
edit post

hell, i'll be the first to say I did not even click the link

5/25/2007 8:16:01 PM

drunknloaded
Suspended
147487 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"I would have done the same thing."

5/25/2007 8:44:31 PM

arghx
Deucefest '04
7584 Posts
user info
edit post

http://www.edmunds.com/pontiac/firebird/history.html



Quote :
"could only muster a 16.02-second run down the quarter-mile at 89.64 mph."


Quote :
"the Trans Am's redesigned shaker hood covered either a 185-horsepower Oldsmobile-built 403-cubic-inch (6.6-liter) V8 or the Pontiac 400 (T/A 6.6) now making 200 horsepower. "


It is a classic, but it is not fast or well-handling...

5/25/2007 9:05:53 PM

Quinn
All American
16417 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
" would have done the same thing"

5/26/2007 7:44:05 AM

optmusprimer
All American
30318 Posts
user info
edit post

^^ it actually did handle quite well for its day

5/26/2007 12:53:18 PM

arghx
Deucefest '04
7584 Posts
user info
edit post

I wouldn't have refused it/sold it out of respect for my pops, but driving a car that seems like it should be fast but can't hang with a v6 camry these days would eventually suck after you get over the "wow 79 trans am" thing

5/26/2007 12:54:22 PM

jsmcconn
All American
1220 Posts
user info
edit post

WHOOOOOO 2nd Gen f-body, keeping white trash moving for 20 years

5/26/2007 4:51:34 PM

optmusprimer
All American
30318 Posts
user info
edit post

^^ you are an idiot, you continue to speak out of your ass and no seem to think its cool to disregard automotive history in favor of some numbers posted on some stupid website.

heres the history lesson, and i am gonna keep it real short

1 hp numbers were measured differently back then and often published at much lower ratings than actual

2 late 70's- gas crisis. big hp cars didnt sell, and every car was horribly choked with emissisions devices like catalytic converters and air injection pumps. in 30 minutes you could seriously de-restrict a car enough to make a night and day difference which was only fair.



historically you are an idiot. you dont have to call miss cleo to predict more of the same.

apples to oranges comparisons are good for two things. jokes and idiots. you are both.

5/26/2007 9:22:11 PM

 Message Boards » The Garage » can't believe this article i just read Page [1]  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.39 - our disclaimer.