jmmurphy Veteran 111 Posts user info edit post |
My cherokee finally quit on me and ended up buying a 97 jetta GL with 55k miles. Anyone know of a chip I can put in it to get more power and better mpg? 6/17/2007 5:55:25 PM |
Mindstorm All American 15858 Posts user info edit post |
This magic chip you speak of, is it made of wood? 6/17/2007 6:02:18 PM |
sumfoo1 soup du hier 41043 Posts user info edit post |
1.8t? 6/17/2007 6:31:20 PM |
grizzlyone Veteran 421 Posts user info edit post |
97 gl is a 2.o 8v
There are several chips available, none will make alot of power, 6-8hp is about all you are going to get. 6/17/2007 7:02:40 PM |
e30ncsu Suspended 1879 Posts user info edit post |
its a jetta, why do you care how much power it has just get a flower lei for the mirror and call it a day 6/17/2007 7:14:06 PM |
jmmurphy Veteran 111 Posts user info edit post |
i dont care about hp, just mpg 6/17/2007 8:21:45 PM |
MaximaDrvr
10401 Posts user info edit post |
more power and more MPG generally don't go together. 6/17/2007 8:23:39 PM |
Mindstorm All American 15858 Posts user info edit post |
Yeah, may as well find a chip to remove your engine's tiny little balls, and then you might get a very very modest increase in MPG at the expense of what little acceleration you had.
Seriously, that's the 2.0L non-turbocharged, yes? That's as good as it gets. They should get in the 30's range as far as MPG I think. If you think whatever you're getting is too low, get it a tune up. New air filter, new spark plugs. Check the tire inflation. That's about all you can do. :E 6/17/2007 8:26:01 PM |
beethead All American 6513 Posts user info edit post |
chip wont do much in terms of fuel economy
and, yes, 97 was a 2.0 na 8v 6/17/2007 10:33:07 PM |
sumfoo1 soup du hier 41043 Posts user info edit post |
why get a 2.0
diesels get better mileage and 1.8s are more fun . 6/18/2007 7:59:33 AM |
E Mun All American 535 Posts user info edit post |
2.0L are bullet proof though. There are chips which can yield more power (marginal) and better gas mileage (somewhat), however, they all require premium (91/93 octane) fuel.
[Edited on June 18, 2007 at 8:16 AM. Reason : .] 6/18/2007 8:15:29 AM |
optmusprimer All American 30318 Posts user info edit post |
^^ and the diesels are only a little slower 6/18/2007 10:39:56 AM |
jmmurphy Veteran 111 Posts user info edit post |
would have rather had the diesel. parents bought it, so no choice. right now its at about 20 city 25 highway 6/18/2007 11:42:59 AM |
Skack All American 31140 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "just get a flower lei for the mirror and call it a day" |
ha ha6/18/2007 11:48:16 AM |
slowblack96 All American 4999 Posts user info edit post |
did not offer the 1.8 in 976/19/2007 2:53:16 AM |
beethead All American 6513 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "right now its at about 20 city 25 highway" |
that is way lower than it should be.. you should be in the 30s..6/19/2007 11:34:12 AM |
E Mun All American 535 Posts user info edit post |
When I had my 2.0 (auto) (RIP), on a trip to VA, I was getting 35 miles per gallon @ 65-70 mph.
Around Raleigh I got 20-22 miles per gallon.
As a comparison, in my VR6 (manual) on a trip to NJ, I was getting ~27 miles per gallon @ 70-75 mph.
Around Raleigh, 20-22 mpg. 6/19/2007 2:42:50 PM |
slowblack96 All American 4999 Posts user info edit post |
i have a carbon hood if you want to buy it 6/19/2007 10:59:14 PM |