User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » Bush.... Page [1]  
HUR
All American
17732 Posts
user info
edit post

uses executive privilege again, discuss...

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/08/01/attorney.firings/index.html

8/1/2007 9:24:33 PM

0EPII1
All American
42541 Posts
user info
edit post

....will go to hell.

....is a terrible human being.

....is a false Christian.

....is a liar.

....is retarded.

....has a binary brain.

8/1/2007 9:47:39 PM

CharlieEFH
All American
21806 Posts
user info
edit post

why wouldn't he?

don't act like you wouldn't

8/1/2007 9:50:05 PM

ncsuapex
SpaceForRent
37776 Posts
user info
edit post

So I guess it was ok when Clinton fired federal judges? Never heard a word about it when he did it....

8/1/2007 11:38:36 PM

statered
All American
2298 Posts
user info
edit post

Beware of the V

8/1/2007 11:45:29 PM

agentlion
All American
13936 Posts
user info
edit post

^^ do we have to go over this again?
Clinton fired all 93 federal judges when he first took office. Just like nearly all Presidents do when there is a change of party in the White House.
.... just like Reagan did in 1981 W Bush did in 2001

Quote :
"Both McNulty and Sampson acknowledged that the Bush administration, like the Clinton administration, brought in a new slate of U.S. attorneys within a few months of taking office.

But historical data compiled by the Senate show the pattern going back to President Reagan.

Reagan replaced 89 of the 93 U.S. attorneys in his first two years in office. President Clinton had 89 new U.S. attorneys in his first two years, and President Bush had 88 new U.S. attorneys in his first two years."

http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/25836/print

8/2/2007 12:27:43 AM

moron
All American
34142 Posts
user info
edit post

^ So the new list of fired attorneys different than the 88 they changed the first time around?

8/2/2007 1:26:20 AM

HiWay58
All American
5111 Posts
user info
edit post

...is an idiot

8/2/2007 4:52:42 AM

Fermat
All American
47007 Posts
user info
edit post

hahahahahahaahah

8/2/2007 5:42:09 AM

drunknloaded
Suspended
147487 Posts
user info
edit post

is probably the worst president we will have in our lifetimes

8/2/2007 6:34:49 AM

Fermat
All American
47007 Posts
user info
edit post

hahah DOES THE COMEDY EVER END?

8/2/2007 6:55:14 AM

agentlion
All American
13936 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"So the new list of fired attorneys different than the 88 they changed the first time around?"

no, all the ones he fired were people that he hired himself a couple years earlier. They were all sworn in during 2001-2002 and began to get fired in 2006, then replaced indefinitely with no confirmation hearings, under the Patriot act.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dismissal_of_U.S._attorneys_controversy_timeline#2001_and_2002

8/2/2007 7:36:56 AM

God
All American
28747 Posts
user info
edit post

how was that authorized under the patriot act? did he say it was for national security reasons or something?

8/2/2007 8:28:32 AM

Lowjack
All American
10491 Posts
user info
edit post

The put some crazy shit in the fine print.

8/2/2007 8:38:35 AM

hershculez
All American
8483 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"The White House says it is trying to protect the president's ability to receive candid advice and offered to let top aides discuss the firings only if they were not placed under oath and no transcript was taken."

8/2/2007 8:49:06 AM

agentlion
All American
13936 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"how was that authorized under the patriot act? did he say it was for national security reasons or something?"

No - there is a provision in the Patriot Act that allows the President to create indefinite, "interim" appointees.

http://tinyurl.com/3b2ylw
Quote :
"The USA PATRIOT Act Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005, signed into law March 9, 2006, amended the law for the interim appointment of U.S. Attorneys by deleting two provisions: (a) the 120-day maximum term for the Attorney General's interim appointees, and (b) the subsequent interim appointment authority of Federal District Courts. (See Law references for the text to the statute (28 U.S.C. ยง 546), and its amendments.) With the revision, an interim appointee can potentially serve indefinitely (though still removable by the President), if the President declines to nominate a U.S. Attorney for a vacancy, or the Senate either fails to act on a Presidential nomination, or rejects a nominee that is different than the interim appointee."


[Edited on August 2, 2007 at 9:15 AM. Reason : url]

8/2/2007 9:15:08 AM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148445 Posts
user info
edit post

he should really base more of his decisions based on what the country wants...after all President is a popularity contest, not a serious job

8/2/2007 9:24:43 AM

federal
All American
2638 Posts
user info
edit post

...more like the GAYtriot act..

8/2/2007 2:17:14 PM

trikk311
All American
2793 Posts
user info
edit post

^^exactly....the only real concerns should be 1) poll numbers and 2) what other countries think

8/2/2007 2:28:02 PM

PartisanHack
Suspended
132 Posts
user info
edit post

^ Sounds like a winning strategy to me!

8/2/2007 2:28:44 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148445 Posts
user info
edit post

you started off somewhat cordial with Blind Hate as well but in the end your pathetic lack of will power always causes you to lash out in a rage of bald anger

8/2/2007 2:32:03 PM

PartisanHack
Suspended
132 Posts
user info
edit post

stalkerific

8/2/2007 2:33:15 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148445 Posts
user info
edit post

Balderific

8/2/2007 2:35:18 PM

PartisanHack
Suspended
132 Posts
user info
edit post

I've been debating on whether to let you in on this secret or not, but since I am losing interest in the place, I figure I'll let it ride.

I am indeed not the State409c/TypeA person you have accused me of. You made it a little to easy with the constant accusations to just check out what it was about that guy that bothered you so much. After reading some of his postings for awhile, it became entirely second nature to copy his style and aggravate you in the exact same way.

I know this won't convince you, but it really is as simple as that. I'm tired of the hate charade I've tried to keep up here for my entertainment purposes, especially since it is no longer entertaining. My theory that you are the most disliked poster in this section (something I learned when I came to this site and saw that people already disliked you after I read some of your posts and realized how dumb you are and how much trouble you caused) has been verified in recent days with the way you have picked fights with people previously neutral to your cause (erios, joshua, duke, terpball, etc).

Carry on!

8/2/2007 2:55:49 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148445 Posts
user info
edit post

stfu you bald faggot troll

your particular trolling method under this particular alias is fairly humorous at first though...in the denial stage...denying that you are STate409c/TypeGay/BaldHate...even though everybody already knows...and then the quick thinking genius that you are, you claim you have been reading my posts for months...however you only registered yesterday...and you know all about the site and me and funny hey you make most of your posts in threads created by Bald Hate, what a big surprise...give up the joke loser...the whole board of TWW knows how pathetic you are based on your bitchy whining via fake inactive usernames

8/2/2007 4:04:35 PM

PartisanHack
Suspended
132 Posts
user info
edit post

Eh, I'm not denying I am Blind Hate.

8/2/2007 4:52:50 PM

 Message Boards » The Soap Box » Bush.... Page [1]  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.39 - our disclaimer.