so i'm on msnbc.com reading an article about romney and mccain. at the bottom it has a list of the presidential candidates and links to their websites. ron paul's link takes you to mitt romney's article attacking mccain. WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS HORSESHIT

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22370986/17153378 << article

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22370986/17153378 << the address of RON PAUL'S LINK

Ron Paul's link is the ONLY one that is incorrect

[Edited on December 22, 2007 at 11:34 PM. Reason : jank]

12/22/2007 11:31:02 PM

easy there sparky, they all link to romney

12/22/2007 11:41:02 PM

They all seem broken to me.

And what's the big deal if they did it? They have the right to print:
DO NOT VOTE FOR RON PAUL
on their main page in big letters, if they want to.

Only a fool would think newspapers aren't biased.

12/22/2007 11:41:29 PM

you are correct, only a fool wouldn't think that they are. but the problem is that the news is not supposed to be biased.

and if they all point to romney, wtf is going on??

12/22/2007 11:54:29 PM

Sure it's supposed to be biased. It's entertainment! Political news all the more so.

CNN and The National Enquirer are in the same category as far as I'm concerned, only in slightly different ranges of the spectrum.

12/23/2007 12:02:00 AM

Quote :

"Sure it's supposed to be biased."

not when it comes to elections, according to federal law

12/23/2007 12:05:38 AM

You're championing states rights in one thread and quoting federal law in another the very next second. You've got to admit that's pretty funny.

Yeah, you're probably right though.

12/23/2007 12:14:57 AM

^ the irony wasn't lost on me Federal law has its place, and ensuring free and fair elections is absolutely one of them.

12/23/2007 12:17:31 AM

its because the links have double ids, all of the links are messed up as a result. put the second number in the url and it works

12/23/2007 12:01:44 PM