it belongs : The Goodwill of IRAN

If this is the depth of the knowledge of Iraq for the democrats, Iraq is fucked. Just like Bush was to ignorant in the begining of the war, they will be completely ignorant to end it.



credit: http://www.ace.mu.nu/

http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/greenwald/8571

Quote :

"Pelosi Credits Iran’s “Goodwill” for Surge Success Abe Greenwald - 05.29.2008 - 2:27 PM In an interview yesterday with the San Francisco Chronicle, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi claimed the U.S. troop surge failed to accomplish its goal. She then partially credited the success of the troop surge to “the goodwill of the Iranians,” claiming that they were responsible for ending violence in the southern city of Basra. Asked if she saw any evidence of the surge’s positive impact on her May 17 trip to Iraq she responded: Well, the purpose of the surge was to provide a secure space, a time for the political change to occur to accomplish the reconciliation. That didn’t happen. Whatever the military success, and progress that may have been made, the surge didn’t accomplish its goal. And some of the success of the surge is that the goodwill of the Iranians-they decided in Basra when the fighting would end, they negotiated that cessation of hostilities-the Iranians. This is an inexcusable slander. Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki brought the Sadrists militias to their knees in a month-long battle that enabled Iraq’s largest Sunni bloc to rejoin the government. Furthermore, when Pelosi met with Prime Minister al-Maliki in Mosul she sang quite a different tune. She had “welcomed Iraq’s progress in passing a budget as well as oil legislation, and a bill paving the way for the provincial elections in the fall that are expected to more equitably redistribute power among local officials,” and stated, “We’re assured the elections will happen here, they will be transparent, they will be inclusive and they will take Iraq closer to the reconciliation we all want it to have.” Discounting the success of the American military, denying the accomplishments of U.S. allies, and giving the credit to our most dangerous enemies seems like an especially productive week for a Democrat on Capitol Hill. After Nancy Pelosi’s post-Iraq hat trick, there’s really no need for Barack Obama to make this trip after all. "

[Edited on May 29, 2008 at 4:15 PM. Reason : fgh]

5/29/2008 4:14:34 PM

Are you saying that Iran didn't play a large role in Basra?

Are you saying that there has been sufficient political progress in Iraq?

5/29/2008 4:16:49 PM

no to the second thing

sunnis just like boycotted the government the other day

[Edited on May 29, 2008 at 4:19 PM. Reason : ok well that was a few days ago...now i hear they are backing off those claims]

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gkx-3oYeFwuWKCusr2jrojs98w8wD90UMAL80

[Edited on May 29, 2008 at 4:20 PM. Reason : .]

5/29/2008 4:18:58 PM

My point is:

Yea, it's tacky of her to say that.

But it's completely normal for a politician to say one thing to one party, and another to a different (referring to her praising the Iraqi govt to their face). She's a politician, no more no less.


But what she is saying has some very unfortunate truth to it. We have to work with Iran, Syria, and other countries in the region, even if we dislike them. They have more sway in Iraq than we do in many cases.

5/29/2008 4:25:54 PM