drunknloaded Suspended 147487 Posts user info edit post |
if each candidate gets 1/3 of the total electorial votes and no one has 270
[Edited on June 3, 2008 at 10:47 PM. Reason : .] 6/3/2008 10:46:42 PM |
nutsmackr All American 46641 Posts user info edit post |
House of Representatives. 6/3/2008 10:47:55 PM |
Mr. Joshua Swimfanfan 43948 Posts user info edit post |
Thunderdome 6/3/2008 10:48:50 PM |
drunknloaded Suspended 147487 Posts user info edit post |
what if they split that 1/3?
[Edited on June 3, 2008 at 10:49 PM. Reason : ^^] 6/3/2008 10:48:58 PM |
JoeSchmoe All American 1219 Posts user info edit post |
Teh Octagon!!!!!1 6/3/2008 10:51:04 PM |
nutsmackr All American 46641 Posts user info edit post |
^^House of Representatives doesn't require a majority vote, only a plurality. 6/3/2008 10:53:21 PM |
Flyin Ryan All American 8224 Posts user info edit post |
^ Wikipedia says they require a majority.
Quote : | "Pursuant to the Twelfth Amendment, the House of Representatives is required to go into session "immediately" to vote for President if no candidate for President receives a majority (270 votes) of the 538 possible electoral votes.
In this event, the House of Representatives is limited to choosing from among the three candidates who received the most electoral votes. Each state delegation has a single vote. To be elected, a candidate must receive an absolute majority of state votes (26) in order for that candidate to become the President-elect. Additionally, delegations from at least two-thirds of all the states must be present for voting to take place. The House continues balloting until a candidate receives an absolute majority of the state votes. This situation would most likely occur only when more than two candidates receive electoral votes, but could happen in an election in which two candidates each receive 269 electoral votes." |
If we ever have an election go to the House again (which with the way politics are now, a 269-269 tie can happen), it's gonna be ugly.
[Edited on June 3, 2008 at 11:07 PM. Reason : /]6/3/2008 11:04:24 PM |
nutsmackr All American 46641 Posts user info edit post |
fucking 12th amendment. 6/3/2008 11:05:48 PM |
drunknloaded Suspended 147487 Posts user info edit post |
so what if 3 candidates each get 16 or 17 states 6/3/2008 11:33:00 PM |
JoeSchmoe All American 1219 Posts user info edit post |
well, then the Seldon Plan would go into effect.
obviously. 6/3/2008 11:57:27 PM |
skokiaan All American 26447 Posts user info edit post |
ha 6/4/2008 12:01:26 AM |
DrSteveChaos All American 2187 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "fucking 12th amendment." |
Well, we could always bring back dueling. Personally, I see an upside to that.6/4/2008 2:23:48 AM |
nutsmackr All American 46641 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "so what if 3 candidates each get 16 or 17 states" |
The candidates are widdled down one at a time, with the lowest vote getter no longer being eligible for being voted on; until someone has the majority.6/4/2008 9:16:37 AM |