joe_schmoe All American 18758 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "ASSOCIATED PRESS - There's no room at the Xcel Energy Center for maverick Ron Paul, so his acolytes have packed their cars, hitched rides on "Ronvoys" and will pitch tents at Ronstock '08 in defiance of next week's GOP convention in St. Paul, Minn.
Almost 9,800 tickets had been sold for the Rally for the Republic, being held in Minneapolis, which seeks to bring together activists who are anti-war, anti-government regulation, anti-immigration, anti-taxes, anti-Federal Reserve, anti-outsourcing, pro-individual liberty, pro-civil liberties and pro-Paul.
And to those who still dismiss him as a crackpot, Ron Paul says, "nanny nanny boo boo."
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26472918/ " |
man, you just can't make this shit up. oh well, if you're in town around Minneapolis this week and need to score a bag of weed, now you know where to go.
[Edited on September 1, 2008 at 3:24 AM. Reason : ]9/1/2008 3:22:24 AM |
tromboner950 All American 9667 Posts user info edit post |
Hooray for Libertarian policies.
Boo for Libertarians acting like complete nutjobs. 9/1/2008 3:24:11 AM |
skokiaan All American 26447 Posts user info edit post |
The pictures are even better
http://tinyurl.com/6l69so
[Edited on September 1, 2008 at 3:25 AM. Reason : .] 9/1/2008 3:24:16 AM |
Supplanter supple anteater 21831 Posts user info edit post |
I wonder what Bob Barr thinks about this?
Quote : | "No GOP speaking role for Paul The rally builds on Paul's presidential bid, in which he set a record for single-day fundraising on the Web and touched a nerve with some disaffected voters, largely in the Republican Party.
In a few Western states, Paul was a serious contender for votes, placing second ahead of Republican John McCain in Nevada and Montana. He drew 14 percent from McCain in New Mexico, a battleground state." |
Also, "disaffected" has to be the top rated political buzzword of the day.
[Edited on September 1, 2008 at 3:30 AM. Reason : .]9/1/2008 3:24:45 AM |
joe_schmoe All American 18758 Posts user info edit post |
Bob Barr?
you mean the guy who wants me to spay or neuter my pets?
9/1/2008 3:30:30 AM |
aaronburro Sup, B 53065 Posts user info edit post |
No. Bob Barr wants you to spay or neuter your democrats. Preferably both 9/1/2008 3:35:53 AM |
Supplanter supple anteater 21831 Posts user info edit post |
I was obviously referring to Bob Barr (the republican/libertarian nominated for the Libertarian candidacy for president for the 2008 election) rather than Bob Barker. 9/1/2008 3:41:16 AM |
joe_schmoe All American 18758 Posts user info edit post |
^^aha. cle-VER
^ ehh whatever. Bob Barker > Bob Barr. far more relevant, too.
[Edited on September 1, 2008 at 3:42 AM. Reason : ] 9/1/2008 3:41:36 AM |
JCASHFAN All American 13916 Posts user info edit post |
We got a great big Ronvoy, rockin' through the night!
Seriously though, Ron Paul might have been the wrong candidate but he was addressing a lot of the right issues. I liked the man, I appreciate the man, but he had a nasty habit of wagging his finger at voters during the debates and chiding them like an angry grandfather. I may still write him in though, I can't keep voting for what I feel to be the lesser of two evils. That and his supporters can be, just, weird. When you're getting ignored at a gun-show . . . yeah.
Bob Barr though, wtf? The Libertarian Party lost all credibility when they nominated him.] 9/1/2008 8:52:40 AM |
TerdFerguson All American 6600 Posts user info edit post |
People need to take notice. This is one of the only large scale GRASSROOTS political movements in the country.
Quote : | "need to score a bag of weed" |
Quote : | "Boo for Libertarians acting like complete nutjobs" |
I dont get it, Yay! for perpetuating stereotypes the TV told you about.
Quote : | "The pictures are even better" |
I actually LOLed at this one though9/1/2008 9:57:29 AM |
eyedrb All American 5853 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "No. Bob Barr wants you to spay or neuter your democrats. Preferably both " |
LOL. Good one.
Ron Paul is right on alot of issues.9/1/2008 10:01:38 AM |
EarthDogg All American 3989 Posts user info edit post |
I'm still hoping that a charismatic communicator will bubble up someday through the ranks of libertarians. Someone who can get people excited about personal responsibility and shrinking gov't power.
I could be dreaming. 9/1/2008 10:56:29 AM |
Aficionado Suspended 22518 Posts user info edit post |
im going to take a chisel tip sharpie to vote for ron paul
then im going to wipe my ass with the ballot 9/1/2008 11:16:28 AM |
GoldenViper All American 16056 Posts user info edit post |
Wait, Ron Paul is anti-immigration?
Well, there goes any support I had for him. 9/1/2008 1:08:05 PM |
moron All American 34142 Posts user info edit post |
I've always found libertarians stance on immigration to be at odds with their ideology. It's like they're able to let go of everything EXCEPT their racism/xenophobia. 9/1/2008 1:13:17 PM |
JCASHFAN All American 13916 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "I dont get it, Yay! for perpetuating stereotypes the TV told you about." | In fairness, as a RP supporter, I was weirded out by some of the guys I saw manning tables and holding signs.9/1/2008 1:25:18 PM |
joe_schmoe All American 18758 Posts user info edit post |
they did seem like the kind who will lock you up in their basement dungeon. 9/1/2008 5:59:23 PM |
TerdFerguson All American 6600 Posts user info edit post |
^^, ^ Really? Most of the ones I met were fairly normal (but what is normal anyways . . . . )
Quote : | "Wait, Ron Paul is anti-immigration? " |
I dont think so, atleast not in my opinion. I think he was more of an "enforce current immigration laws and most importantly protect the nation's borders." He was especially adamant about protecting the borders as the Constitution says pretty explicitly that that is Federal Gov.'s job
That position is hardly anti-immigration, just anti-free-for-all that is currently happening at our borders. I have no idea what his stance was for Illegals currently in the US (I doubt it was amnesty though).9/1/2008 7:28:56 PM |
TerdFerguson All American 6600 Posts user info edit post |
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/02/paul.convention/index.html
Quote : | "Thousands rally at Ron Paul convention" |
Quote : | "Paul said he entered the presidential race not because of what he wanted to do but because of what he did not want to do.
"I did not want to run people's lives. I did not want to run the economy and I did not want to run the world. I didn't have the authority to do it, and I didn't have the Constitution behind me to do it," said Paul, " |
[Edited on September 3, 2008 at 6:43 AM. Reason : quote/unquote]9/3/2008 6:41:13 AM |
Republican18 All American 16575 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Hooray for Libertarian policies.
Boo for Libertarians acting like complete nutjobs." |
9/3/2008 5:28:43 PM |
BoBo All American 3093 Posts user info edit post |
Which state gave him their delagates? ... he earned 5 at the Republican convention 9/4/2008 1:15:24 AM |
red baron 22 All American 2166 Posts user info edit post |
if the libertarians were not such nuts they might win, hell i support them 9/4/2008 1:39:36 AM |
joe_schmoe All American 18758 Posts user info edit post |
libertarians never get more than 2-3% of the popular vote in national elections.
its not only because they're full of beret-wearing neckbeards... although it does make them all that much more amusing.
they've stuck it out longer than most every other 3rd party in US history... but they'll disappear soon enough -- just like every other third party has. 9/4/2008 3:09:16 AM |
dagreenone All American 5971 Posts user info edit post |
^ Not so sure about that last part. I've known dozens of republicans jump to libertarian in the past 2 year than anytime before. I haven't looked at any numbers, but I do think they are growing, not dying. 9/4/2008 3:37:22 PM |
joe_schmoe All American 18758 Posts user info edit post |
^ you're right. my estimate of 2-3% was way off.
i should have said less than one-half of 1%
Libertarian Presidential Tickets
1972: John Hospers and Theodora Nathan 2,691 popular votes (0.003%); 1 electoral vote; 1976: Roger MacBride and David Bergland 173,011 popular votes (0.21%) 1980: Ed Clark and David Koch 921,299 popular votes (1.1%) 1984: David Bergland and James A. Lewis 228,705 popular votes (0.25%) 1988: Ron Paul and Andre Marrou 432,179 popular votes (0.47%) 1992: Andre Marrou and Nancy Lord 291,627 popular votes (0.28%) 1996: Harry Browne and Jo Jorgensen 485,798 popular votes (0.50%) 2000: Harry Browne and Art Olivier 384,431 popular votes (0.36%) 2004: Michael Badnarik and Richard Campagna 397,265 popular votes (0.34%) 2008: Bob Barr and Wayne Allyn Root TBD
[Edited on September 4, 2008 at 5:12 PM. Reason : ]9/4/2008 5:10:09 PM |
Hillsborough New Recruit 18 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "but they'll disappear soon enough" |
I don't think so.9/4/2008 5:41:40 PM |
Cherokee All American 8264 Posts user info edit post |
fucking best patriot we have in the country, don't know why people hate him so much. you talk about low taxes, the fucker wants to abolish the irs. what's lower than that?? 9/4/2008 10:00:37 PM |
joe_schmoe All American 18758 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "I don't think so." |
oh, ok. my bad.
they'll continue to loiter about, collecting 0.5% of the popular vote for another century
9/4/2008 10:18:31 PM |
TerdFerguson All American 6600 Posts user info edit post |
because things never change . . .ever . . . . under any circumstances 9/5/2008 8:14:04 AM |
mrfrog ☯ 15145 Posts user info edit post |
How is McCain a maverick, How is he a reformist, How is he any different from the crap out there
When they shun Ron Paul? 9/5/2008 8:32:50 AM |
Hillsborough New Recruit 18 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "fucking best patriot we have in the country, don't know why people hate him so much. you talk about low taxes, the fucker wants to abolish the irs. what's lower than that??" |
There are other sources for the government income. If you spend responsibly, i.e. no war on iraq, afghanistan, iran, drugs etc. you don't need a lot of money anyway.
BTW, if we reduce government spending to the levels of just a decade ago we can abolish the IRS without any problem.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkPUeFtLrPM9/7/2008 9:39:32 PM |
Supplanter supple anteater 21831 Posts user info edit post |
Looks like republican/libertarian Ron Paul called for his followers to vote 3rd party. He gave a few options, but it seems to me the most overlap with be with the republican/libertarian Bob Barr who has the libertarian's nomination to run for president along with his vice presidential nominee republican/libertarian Wayne Allyn Root.
Looks like there is now a place for disaffected republicans to go. 9/10/2008 9:06:06 PM |
Konami All American 10855 Posts user info edit post |
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/10/paul.endorsement/?iref=mpstoryview
if only more people would buy into the idea. 9/11/2008 1:52:39 AM |
TerdFerguson All American 6600 Posts user info edit post |
^agreed
the crazy thing is I think a lot of people do buy into it. If you ask most people if they like the two party system, they respond with a "no, not really." and yet it remains for some reason (honestly I cant even figure it out)
but as usual Dr. Paul is hitting the nail on the head with gems like these
Quote : | ""If you ever get to the point where you believe the two parties are essentially the same, if the majority is outside of the establishment, it's not very democratic. The process is not working," Paul said.
" |
and
Quote : | "Paul said he's supporting the third-party candidates because the two major parties and media had "colluded" to avoid discussing issues and falsely presenting the difference between McCain and Obama as real.
" |
(quotes from Konami's link above)9/11/2008 11:30:05 AM |