Every single post of his is untruthful and trolling bullshit. This guy should have been suspended days ago.


Just a sample:

http://brentroad.com/message_search.aspx?type=posts&username=csharp_live

[Edited on September 3, 2008 at 5:46 PM. Reason : ]

9/3/2008 5:45:32 PM

[fail]

9/3/2008 5:49:13 PM

He's basically like Rat.

People in the Soap Box aren't willing or able to ignore him so it continues.

9/3/2008 9:18:48 PM

^ Amen

Fucking ignore him if you don't like it. Who gives a shit if others respond. You know his logic is retarded, what on Earth do you have to prove by responding to him?

9/3/2008 9:59:37 PM

ummm, it IS Rat....

9/3/2008 10:14:27 PM

suspend him, he's interfering with God's ability to unabatedly smear Palin in every thread which is serious business

9/4/2008 11:03:07 AM

^

9/4/2008 11:55:12 AM

the guy is more of a shitstain than Twista.

that's such an accomplishment, im not sure if he should be suspended or made mod.

9/4/2008 1:46:05 PM

He's not remotely in the same category as Twista. TT can be irritating as fuck in the soapbox, but at least he steers clear of blatant racism and abject retardation.

9/6/2008 4:27:25 PM

where is the duke? is he not gonna ban this guy?

9/6/2008 9:33:25 PM

THABIGL

9/7/2008 2:25:23 AM

bttt

9/8/2008 3:28:54 PM

yeah, i regret comparing Rat Csharp_live to Twista.

rat csharp_live's an idiot of epic proportions. TT is not even in the same ballpark. not even the same motherfucking sport.

9/8/2008 5:02:00 PM

^^^^ i've been on the road for the last 10 days...i've been online a little, but not a whole lot. i'll keep my eyes open for this guy.

9/8/2008 10:52:50 PM

well to be honest, my soul purpose is actually to give a fair swing to both parties...

it's ppl like God and tschudi that are simply here to say "fuck you" and give mindless replies whenever somebody has a witty or clever article about some political event.

they make threads like this for anybody swinging for the right anyway, lol

9/9/2008 5:37:16 AM

signed

9/9/2008 6:29:41 AM

signed.

9/10/2008 1:28:44 PM

signed.

9/10/2008 2:30:13 PM

if all you petition signers could link to his posts that you find suspension worthy that might help your case.

9/10/2008 2:48:44 PM

Quote :

"my soul purpose is actually to give a fair swing to both parties..."

1. sole, not soul. I find it hard to believe you've even been close to a college. Especially based on most of your posts.

2. Just because you say it doesn't make it true. In practice you have participated in the most disturbing and blatantly partisan ignorance and retardation that I have ever seen on TSB. If you really mean any of what you say, you are the worst kind of human being.

3. As someone who leans heavily Libertarian, I feel obligated to say that no matter how utterly moronic or detrimental-to-society your ideas are, you are fully within your rights to say them, and unfortunately, you're still allowed to vote. However, T-dub is not a public/government organization and thus free speech is controlled through the discretion of the moderators. So it's Duke's call.


Personally I'd like to see this guy gone.

9/11/2008 12:16:39 PM

Quote :

"if all you petition signers could link to his posts that you find suspension worthy that might help your case."

Look at basically all his posts in TSB. There's not even a need to single anything out, he simply has not made an intelligent point yet. He makes no attempt to research what is being discussed... in fact he doesn't even act like he understands things on the most basic level, instead resorting to arguments which amount more or less to "I think you are saying 'DURR HURR'. I am clearly right."

9/11/2008 12:21:52 PM

(sorry for the triplepost)

I retract a few of my statements, his past 5 posts or so have been pretty reasonable... maybe it's because he's been talking about energy policy, and because his stances on energy policy are actually intelligent/well-founded, but he hasn't done anything I'd consider suspension-worthy this afternoon.

9/11/2008 3:11:49 PM

message_topic.aspx?topic=540848

doing the same thing salisburyboy got indefinitely suspended for. Make ridiculous argument, don't counter response but instead spew shit for the rest of the thread.

9/12/2008 9:50:04 AM

salisburyboy did *not* get suspended for merely making stupid arguments and not addressing responses, ad infinitium.

salisburyboy got suspended for posting an execution video, followed by agitprop suggesting that white folks should arm themselves and start killing minorities.

everyone just finally had enough.

message_topic.aspx?topic=492336





[Edited on September 12, 2008 at 1:57 PM. Reason : ]

9/12/2008 1:50:40 PM

Quote :

"He's not remotely in the same category as Twista. TT can be irritating as fuck in the soapbox, but at least he steers clear of blatant racism and abject retardation."

yes.

but csharp really just waters down any intelligence in every single thread he posts in. retardation by association.

9/12/2008 3:09:26 PM

^^hey schmoe, welcome back. hows the offline time going?


look at you babies. can't handle any opposition to your dogmatic high taxing ways? want to sit around and preach to your left wing choir all day? then go find another internet. if you want to sit around and throw expletives at me and other conservatives all day, then man up a little and do it in public or take a breather yourself. I'm not the one throwing around personal attacks constantly

come back down to reality

[Edited on September 12, 2008 at 3:56 PM. Reason : .]

9/12/2008 3:46:20 PM

Does anyone actually feel like modding the soap box?

9/12/2008 4:14:29 PM

^^ i'm not "back," dipshit. i left TSB (not TWW) due to the likes of retards like you. you suck the intelligence out of every debate you enter. TSB is not even worthwhile to me as a time-waster any more.

9/13/2008 12:43:04 AM

Quote :

"I'm not the one throwing around personal attacks constantly"

If I weren't lazy I would go and find at least three examples to prove you wrong. In fact, what the hell, I'll do it anyway. I'll grant you that you're GOOD at hiding your derision of others... you virtually never have the balls to say something directly, you do it through an attitude of superiority and a slew of not-so-subtle implications.


Assuming mocking statements, sarcastic responses, sweeping negative generalizations, and negative implications can be considered "personal attacks"...

http://www.thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=539176&page=14#12021092
I didn't even know this was here till I started looking, and now I'm totally amazed he is still being allowed to post.

http://www.thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=539755
Sweeping generalizations about all liberals and all democrats. You're not the only one to do this sort of thing, but that doesn't make it okay.

http://www.thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=540512&page=1#12036739
Granted it's a personal attack on a candidate, but this is just the sort of thing that doesn't belong on TSB.

http://www.thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=540147&page=1#12025243
Indirectly insulting someone's sexual prowess while ignoring data and evidence. Okay on ChitChat but not TSB.

I'm done, but if you want more just look at the multitude of posts in which he references "all liberals" with sweeping statements, or refers to "the dems" (implying all democrats, not the official party) in various ways, such as that none of them can hold a job, implying they're all welfare queens, ect.

Quote :

"if you want to sit around and throw expletives at me and other conservatives all day, then man up a little and do it in public or take a breather yourself"

1. For the record I'm a libertarian (in other words, more conservative than you).

2. Other conservatives on TSB don't get berated. As far as college internet message boards go, we ARE NOT radically liberal like you think. Not in the least. You do get berated, though, because you spout blatantly partisan talking points with little substance and no factual support, but the intelligent conservatives are actually able to hold their own.

3. You were throwing "expletives" around just as much when you started posting on TSB, you've only recently calmed down once people started calling for your suspension, so that you could claim the high horse of morality and clean posting.

4. That "man up and say it to my face" bullshit is laughable.

5. Now that that mess is done with, csharp, why don't you go find some of your posts that have any degree of substance to prove why you should be allowed to keep posting on TSB?
(If your track record is any indication, I'll bet you'll ignore this part of my post completely and try to start an irrelevant argument over something else.)

9/13/2008 2:06:33 AM

^wow, i have a fanclub.


keep quoting me. those are pretty good quotes actually. nice to know i'm researched so much

Quote :

"Assuming mocking statements, sarcastic responses, sweeping negative generalizations, and negative implications can be considered "personal attacks"..."

so basically you just admitted i've given 0 personal attacks. and then you write your own definition of personal attacks to make me guilty. lol. just like a democrat.

keep up the good work. D-

[Edited on September 13, 2008 at 10:05 AM. Reason : ,]

9/13/2008 9:58:56 AM

I must be a prophet, you DID completely ignore the part of my post addressed towards you and start a discussion about something else.

9/13/2008 4:26:26 PM

Assuming mocking statements, sarcastic responses, sweeping negative generalizations, and negative implications can be considered "personal attacks"

tschudi:

Quote :

"Fuck Sarah Palin"

9/13/2008 6:03:55 PM

^could have easily meant "I want to have sexual relations with Sarah Palin"

9/15/2008 3:18:01 AM

Quote :

"salisburyboy did *not* get suspended for merely making stupid arguments and not addressing responses, ad infinitium. salisburyboy got suspended for posting an execution video, followed by agitprop suggesting that white folks should arm themselves and start killing minorities."

It's true that he got terminated for in the end for the execution video. However, he was suspended for shorter periods long before that, and then given a short leash/posting "rules" because he would continue to make stupid arguments and then not address responses--just like csharp.

9/15/2008 10:13:14 AM

Quote :

"suspend him, he's interfering with God's ability to unabatedly smear Palin in every thread which is serious business"

9/16/2008 11:10:47 AM

i just noticed that chance advocated ignoring someone if you dont like their posts

hahahahahahahhahahahahaha

9/18/2008 5:03:11 PM

yeah, that's pretty funny

though not bad advice


and if you don't want to do that, why not systematically dismantle this guy's arguments like you would with anyone else? isn't putting the dunce hat on him better than just kicking him out of the club?

9/18/2008 7:15:58 PM

I am ignoring him.

Him and Treetwista10 have the exact same responses. It's impossible to "dismantle" their arguments, because they don't HAVE any arguments. You could completely destroy them with logic and examples, and they'd just dodge the question by committing any number of fallacies.

For examples of this, please look at any of their posts.

9/18/2008 7:41:44 PM

Quote :

"systematically dismantle this guy's arguments like you would with anyone else? isn't putting the dunce hat on him better than just kicking him out of the club?"

i concur with this statement. please begin this process

9/18/2008 7:44:30 PM

Quote :

"It's impossible to "dismantle" their arguments, because they don't HAVE any arguments"

exactly...presenting arguments is for people that are wrong...theres no point in arguing when you no i'm right

9/18/2008 8:23:04 PM

Quote :

"why not systematically dismantle this guy's arguments like you would with anyone else?"

because it's not worth the effort and he'll ignore you anyway and continue posting erratic BS? Not to mention there are people with arguments worth reading.

^

Quote :

"theres no point in arguing when you no i'm right"

9/18/2008 9:57:13 PM

A good example of Treetwista's dodging is on this page:

http://brentroad.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=539332&page=27

9/18/2008 10:03:50 PM

Quote :

"You could completely destroy them with logic and examples, and they'd just dodge the question by committing any number of fallacies. "

then press the attack and point out those fallacies.

9/18/2008 10:18:37 PM

only an elitest points out other peoples fallacies lol

9/18/2008 10:21:36 PM

Quote :

"then press the attack and point out those fallacies."

Yeah, see.. we do that. We say, "Hey, you completely ignored what I said, and you just responded ad hominem."

And then they go "lol liberals go palin!"

It's just inflammatory, and it does absolutely nothing to further the discussion.

Last few posts by CSharp_Live:

Quote :

"since liberals like the death of humans so much, why are they opposed to the iraq war?"

Quote :

"You say we need to drill for oil? Sure.. I'll drill. Your fat wallets!!!1111 *Picture of Obama*"

And hey, he has a minor on topic discussion in this thread:

http://brentroad.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=541506

And then back to shit:

Quote :

"let's just get rid of money altogether. then obamas equality plan would be perfect."

Quote :

"gg mccain"

Quote :

"lol"

Quote :

"lowest of the low communist asshat. get out of this country before you are found and rooted out. plz just leave."

9/18/2008 10:36:55 PM

[Edited on September 18, 2008 at 11:40 PM. Reason : .]

9/18/2008 11:18:07 PM

A good example of God's not knowing how to properly link threads on this page:

message_topic.aspx?topic=539906

9/19/2008 12:09:51 AM

csharp_live is the quintessential tragic hero.

and yeah, i said quintessential, motherfuckers.

9/19/2008 2:12:01 AM

sanks guys

9/19/2008 9:16:44 AM

bttt, what a lowsy fucker.

9/19/2008 9:52:50 PM