is usually the play that actually wins the game? fucking bullshit.

Gettysburg was the "game changing performance" for Union in the War of Northern Aggression. Not Appomattox. So why the fuck would you focus on plays that win the game. You need to focus on shit that actually changes the flow of the game.

9/20/2008 5:04:18 PM

Are these still sponsored by Pontiac?

9/20/2008 5:06:10 PM

yes, but you're talking about sports fans

a vast majority of sports fans are simpletons

if you ask them what won the game, they'll say the winning play

because they're idiots

it's all pandering

9/20/2008 5:07:04 PM

well, "game changing" doesn't imply what won the game. I think most people could look at the question of "what changed the game" differently than "what won the game."

9/20/2008 5:08:05 PM

well they're obviously not going to pick some egregious error

so it's going to be a positive play

like i said, pandering

9/20/2008 5:14:23 PM

what game are you talking about? our gcp was the 4th and 1 surge if you ask me with the reviewed td a close 2nd and the andre run to "win it" not even in the top 10

9/20/2008 5:36:22 PM

brown's play on 2nd and 11 in ot was probably bigger than the td run if you get right down to it.

who cares.

9/20/2008 5:51:25 PM

our game-changing play was the first goal line stand

even though TOB used a timeout to settle the defense for the second stand, they wouldn't have made it even with the timeout if the first one hadn't shown they could do it

9/20/2008 5:55:34 PM