Jaybee1200 Suspended 56200 Posts user info edit post |
Question: In its current form, should the NCAA Football Championship be between the two best teams, the two best teams at the end of the year, or the two most deserving teams?
Currently its more towards the two best teams at the end of the year (losing late hurts you a lot more than losing early) but what do you feel like it should be? 11/10/2008 6:12:12 PM |
simonn best gottfriend 28968 Posts user info edit post |
two most deserving teams. 11/10/2008 6:12:38 PM |
Jaybee1200 Suspended 56200 Posts user info edit post |
and if you say the two most deserving, does the potential impact on the quality of the Championship game matter to you?
say a 12-0 Utah team gets stomped by a 11-1 Florida team while Texas, Texas Tech, Oklahoma, etc. stay at home
[Edited on November 10, 2008 at 6:17 PM. Reason : d] 11/10/2008 6:14:10 PM |
simonn best gottfriend 28968 Posts user info edit post |
oh lol, if you leave it up to me, no non-bcs team is "deserving". 11/10/2008 6:15:45 PM |
tsavla All American 6787 Posts user info edit post |
12-0 Utah team will deserve a place in BCS championship if Texas, Texas Tech, Oklahoma or any other team are undeserving that year
^ add OSU to that list
[Edited on November 10, 2008 at 6:17 PM. Reason : ..] 11/10/2008 6:17:03 PM |
Jaybee1200 Suspended 56200 Posts user info edit post |
by "deserving" I am talking about 12-0 vs. 11-1 11/10/2008 6:17:34 PM |
Steven All American 6156 Posts user info edit post |
^^^Boise State says you're gay.
[Edited on November 10, 2008 at 6:18 PM. Reason : yea] 11/10/2008 6:17:55 PM |
simonn best gottfriend 28968 Posts user info edit post |
^^ well then i change my answer to "best team".
^ no u. 11/10/2008 6:22:04 PM |
Doss2k All American 18474 Posts user info edit post |
I say first step in the right direction is no polls allowed until the same week the BCS starts being released. 11/10/2008 6:24:08 PM |
aph319 All American 8570 Posts user info edit post |
The answer is a combination of best and deserving, also known as, a PLAYOFF
The worst thing about CFB is that a non-BCS school has absolutely no shot at playing for a BCS national championship. Is there any other sport where half the teams are excluded from even thinking about a national championship before the season begins? 11/10/2008 6:24:42 PM |
hondaguy All American 6409 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "the two best teams, the two best teams at the end of the year" |
shouldn't these two be the same since the teams to play for the championship wouldn't be determined until the end of the year. The only difference between the two is how the "best team" is determined.11/10/2008 9:08:54 PM |
tromboner950 All American 9667 Posts user info edit post |
^I think he was talking national ranking when he used the word "best". 11/10/2008 10:31:36 PM |
Jaybee1200 Suspended 56200 Posts user info edit post |
^^ not necessarily, a team could be the best team all year, lose the last game and therefore not get in the championship game 11/10/2008 10:58:08 PM |
Slave Famous Become Wrath 34079 Posts user info edit post |
It should be the sexiest matchup with the most star power that will get the highest TV ratings and make even the most casual fan's dick rock hard
Alabama is out...most people can't name three people on their team not named John Parker Wilson
Oklahoma is out...they've shit the bed in seemingly every big bowl game since Josh Heupel left
Texas Tech is out...lots of points, but no tradition, still not enough name recognition on a national level
Texas is out...Thier biggest win was a noon game too early in the season; the TTU loss is fresh in everyone's minds
That leaves USC and Florida...the each lost to a far inferior opponent, but we know who they are and they consistently are in the National Title mix every year. We're comfortable with them, intrigued by them, and goddammit we'd love to watch them play each other. 11/10/2008 11:08:13 PM |
dgspencer All American 4474 Posts user info edit post |
^ by God he's right 11/11/2008 12:30:54 AM |
simonn best gottfriend 28968 Posts user info edit post |
^^ i do love watching both of those teams play. 11/11/2008 12:32:32 AM |
wolfAApack All American 9980 Posts user info edit post |
I just got a chubby 11/11/2008 4:35:18 AM |
jtmartin All American 4116 Posts user info edit post |
LOL. I've argued about this for years.
-Pre-season rankings are set based on how "experts" think a team should do (more heavily is how big of a name school they are)
-after those rankings are established, teams move up or down the rankings based on their performance for the week. The later in the season, the less you move up or down.
-the best teams are whoever hasn't lost recently. A one loss team that lost to a no-name unranked school in the first game is obviously better than a one loss team that lost to a top ten team by 1 point
VIOLA! perfect rankings!
it will never be fair until there is a playoff. it is trying to compare apples to oranges half the time and using the team A beat team B who beat team C so A>C. it just doesn't work. There is a reason the NFL has a playoff 11/11/2008 4:42:51 AM |