User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » Live Albums Or Songs Vs Studio Page [1]  
Republican18
All American
16575 Posts
user info
edit post

What does everyone prefer. I generally like studio better because its polished and mixed well. but some live versions and performances are phenomenal as well. I do hate live versions of songs where the band lets the audience sing half the song.....it sounds like crap. Some bands are also known for really great sounding live music, so I guess it just depends.

2/1/2009 11:27:24 PM

Ernie
All American
45943 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"I guess it just depends"

2/1/2009 11:38:13 PM

BobbyDigital
Thots and Prayers
41777 Posts
user info
edit post

2/1/2009 11:40:05 PM

jprince11
All American
14181 Posts
user info
edit post

a lot of guys do cool solos and leads and stuff that are just basic riffs in the studio, but then again the studios have the production

2/2/2009 12:45:30 AM

Woodfoot
All American
60354 Posts
user info
edit post

this is essentially like asking if i like inhaling or exhaling more

if you made like a list of 100 songs, i could give you 100 answers

2/2/2009 12:55:45 AM

Ernie
All American
45943 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"I guess it just depends"

2/2/2009 12:57:19 AM

Big Business
Suspended
9099 Posts
user info
edit post

what the fuck kind of retarded question is this?

This all depends on live quality, how much studio mixing adds to the original sound presentation (background vocals, track overlays, ect) whether or not people in the crowd are annoying or add to the experience, and um... how good the live performance is vs if the artist has improved in skill since the recording.

shit thread.

I'm Big Business and i approved this message.

2/2/2009 12:59:13 AM

Specter
All American
6575 Posts
user info
edit post

in general i dont like it when bands stray far away from their studio version when playing live. adding extra stuff is sometimes alright, but there are a few bands who just dont put as much into it (vocalists mostly) when performing live

2/2/2009 1:01:25 AM

Woodfoot
All American
60354 Posts
user info
edit post

and then there is stuff like DMB's two step

which was on a live album before it was on a studio album , technically

2/2/2009 1:05:33 AM

bassman803
All American
16965 Posts
user info
edit post

Weather Report: Live And Unreleased
amazing

Weather Report: Black Market
amazing

2/2/2009 4:05:30 AM

vinylbandit
All American
48079 Posts
user info
edit post

Studio versions aren't necessarily polished or mixed well.

See the Bowie mix of Raw Power...sounds like shit, though is not without its charm.

2/2/2009 4:13:08 AM

wilso
All American
14657 Posts
user info
edit post

i've always liked built to spill's live version of "virginia reel around the fountain" which is technically a halo benders song, but it sounds much better when it's just doug's vocals (the other guy's vocals are lame and add nothing).

2/2/2009 6:52:06 AM

CalledToArms
All American
22025 Posts
user info
edit post

totally depends on the band. i cant answer this straight up. live version the majority of the time if the band is good live though probably, but still too hard to answer in general.

2/2/2009 7:26:07 AM

slaptit
All American
2991 Posts
user info
edit post

i think there are a number of songs that sound better when live acoustic

neon by john mayer comes to mind

also, the entire Dave Matthews/Tim Reynolds at Radio City Music Hall

2/2/2009 9:48:24 AM

 Message Boards » Entertainment » Live Albums Or Songs Vs Studio Page [1]  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.38 - our disclaimer.