global warming


that is all. </flamebait>

3/10/2009 6:25:32 PM

I see

3/10/2009 6:26:01 PM

flambait= homo

3/10/2009 6:26:31 PM

if you just copy paste into your url bar you don't have to fuck with fonts and find out the gay shit people post in small fonts real quick

3/10/2009 6:26:56 PM

tree-fucking hippie liberals

3/10/2009 6:28:26 PM

^^clicking edit post is faster than highlight, copy/paste. Or I thought so.

3/10/2009 6:32:48 PM

so if someone reneges, what are they called?

3/10/2009 6:40:30 PM

a renegade?

3/10/2009 6:42:02 PM

3/10/2009 8:36:12 PM

i get all warm and fuzzy inside when people who learned their physics from AXE ads get all indignant about science

3/10/2009 8:38:35 PM

as opposed to people who learned their physics from the almighty god and creator (of the internet), al gore?

3/10/2009 8:54:46 PM

3/10/2009 8:59:11 PM

3/10/2009 9:21:13 PM

l0s3r

3/10/2009 9:31:39 PM

don't give away the secrets

3/10/2009 9:32:56 PM

3/11/2009 4:43:22 PM

face warming

3/11/2009 4:45:25 PM

shit i got my global warming all over your face.

3/11/2009 4:53:02 PM

i just globally warmed my toilet with a steamy turd

3/11/2009 4:56:50 PM

3/11/2009 6:44:44 PM

Barack Obama does not care about white people.

3/11/2009 6:59:31 PM

3/11/2009 6:59:34 PM

BARACK THE COCK OBAMA

3/11/2009 9:07:04 PM

Now children, how could a man who invented the internet and put all that shit in a lock box ever be wrong?

3/11/2009 9:14:34 PM

4/3/2009 9:53:50 PM

Q-rays

4/3/2009 9:55:34 PM

4/3/2009 10:09:57 PM

^ haha

4/3/2009 10:10:43 PM

Junk Science:

Psychology
Sociology
Paleontology
Geology
Chemistry
Zoology

4/3/2009 10:16:36 PM

"Physics is the only real science. The rest are just stamp collecting." -- Rutherford

4/3/2009 10:41:04 PM

I honestly think it's absurd that the sciences are broken up into "biology" "chemistry" "physics" etc.

yes, they all present different topics, but you have to understand all of them to make true sense of any of them.

4/3/2009 10:46:52 PM

absurd? really?

4/3/2009 10:48:03 PM

let me clarify... i'm coming from an educational perspective... and how they are broken up to be taught. it is not the most efficient way to do it.

4/3/2009 10:49:33 PM

how else could it be taught that you would feel would be sufficient

4/3/2009 10:51:43 PM

photosynthesis for example... it requires chemistry, physics, and biology to master.

as it stands now, it is glazed over in all three courses without true understanding. A topic/project based course could go in depth for topics such as these and lead to true student mastery of a topic, having learned about it from the perspective of all the science fields.

4/3/2009 10:53:52 PM

i mean how would you organize this in the educational system, say for high school students

would it be something like Science I, Science II, Science III, Science IV? (or I-VIII if it's just a semester each) and which topics would come before others

i know you don't have all that thought out or anything, but I think the way it is taught now is about the best they can do. If all aspects of photosynthesis aren't known after a biology course, then whenever it would become more important to an individual, they could learn about it at that point in time

i dont think there's any way a majority of students could actually be taught everything about every science topic and be expected to remember (or LEARN) it... and i don't really think it's necessary




or are you talking about college-level

[Edited on April 3, 2009 at 11:03 PM. Reason : ]

4/3/2009 11:02:47 PM

4/8/2009 8:34:52 PM

Quote :

"photosynthesis for example... it requires chemistry, physics, and biology to master. as it stands now, it is glazed over in all three courses without true understanding. A topic/project based course could go in depth for topics such as these and lead to true student mastery of a topic, having learned about it from the perspective of all the science fields."

im assuming you're talking about college level? Otherwise I'll have to disagree with you. I feel like everything up through HS is supposed to touch a little bit on a lot of stuff instead of going in depth in select areas.

4/8/2009 9:29:02 PM

high school is bullshit. they don't teach you anything.

4/8/2009 9:46:51 PM

well to be fair maybe I had a skewed perspective not going to a public school because I learned quite a bit in high school. Yes I didn't get deep into any one subject but I felt like I had a good education. IE first year of college there was hardly anything I hadnt already covered most of in HS through chemistry, calc, english (heck english 101 was equivalent to my freshman HS English class probably) spanish etc.

4/8/2009 9:51:07 PM

^ the first year of college is a bunch of bullshit too because no one learns anythig in high school so they teach it again in college.

i didn't go to public school either. i didn't even go to high school.

4/8/2009 10:03:42 PM

maybe it depends on how you applied yourself, I dono. I mean I didnt come out of HS an expert in anything, thats for sure. But I feel like I got a well rounded education and learned quite a bit. The main thing that I would say I didnt get in school, which is pretty common in all schools public and private in the US, is a real solid understanding of a second language. Then again the one thing that hurts us on that as well is the fact that most of us never/hardly ever get to use the foreign language we learn in school as opposed to other countries in Europe etc.

4/8/2009 10:07:51 PM