BigT716 All American 3458 Posts user info edit post |
Tired of my old PowerBook G4, time for an upgrade. Getting a new unibody Macbook Pro!
No I don't care if you think macs suck.
I can't decide which processor. Having some trouble finding concise to the point comparisons on the two through google. Is it worth the extra cash($300) for the faster processor?
2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Duo 2.93GHz Intel Core 2 Duo 5/8/2009 10:39:40 AM |
dakota_man All American 26584 Posts user info edit post |
I think macs suck, do you care?
[Edited on May 8, 2009 at 10:44 AM. Reason : ps I'd go for the upgraded processor] 5/8/2009 10:44:40 AM |
Shaggy All American 17820 Posts user info edit post |
macs suck and unless you're going to be doing a ton of video encoding, theres nothing you can do on that mac that will take advantage of a few extra clock cycles.
Unless of course you install windows, in which case theres no reason to get a mac in the first place. 5/8/2009 10:53:52 AM |
RSXTypeS Suspended 12280 Posts user info edit post |
^lol
^^lol
I have a 17" unibody with the 2.66GHz. I do a lot of development and design work on it and its more than enough. I also run two VM's (Win XP and Vista) at the same time for testing purposes and I've had no problems at all. But I also have 4gb of RAM so thats something I would definitely spend the money on or save yourself a few bucks and order the memory from newegg and install yourself. 5/8/2009 11:03:51 AM |
darkone (\/) (;,,,;) (\/) 11611 Posts user info edit post |
Obvious Question: What are you going to be doing with your laptop? Are you going to be doing a lot of processor intensive things that will really benefit from the extra 333 MHz? 5/8/2009 11:08:42 AM |
dannydigtl All American 18302 Posts user info edit post |
2.66ghz for sho. although maybe the 2.93 would have better resale value some day.
I like to think i work my 2.5ghz pretty well. I always have an XP VMware session running and i do a lot of Lightroom, Photoshop, Word, a bit of Final Cut, and of course tons of firefox tabs open. thats with 4gigs of ram.
This thing multitasks like a champ. 5/8/2009 12:18:59 PM |
qntmfred retired 40819 Posts user info edit post |
I've got the 2.66 hasn't ever been less than adequate for my needs 5/8/2009 1:06:30 PM |
V0LC0M All American 21263 Posts user info edit post |
Macs are such a damn ripoff. 5/8/2009 5:12:39 PM |
dannydigtl All American 18302 Posts user info edit post |
there was a time when i believed that, too. 5/8/2009 8:09:24 PM |
catalyst All American 8704 Posts user info edit post |
i always buy the higher end model to help with resale value 5/8/2009 8:23:06 PM |
evan All American 27701 Posts user info edit post |
yeah, go with the 2.66, you won't notice the difference in performance and honestly it doesn't justify the price increase.
$11/MHz is pretty damn expensive. 5/8/2009 11:15:28 PM |
agentlion All American 13936 Posts user info edit post |
either one of them will scream, especially compared to your G4.... 5/8/2009 11:28:36 PM |