3/22/2010 11:18:05 PM
just wait till you get to pay the "Healthcare affordability fee" which will charge you 50 bux extra every time you go to the doctor in order to make the doctor more affordable, lol
3/22/2010 11:20:48 PM
I am gonna start picking up two ragged ass refrigerators a year to turn in to get my money back.
3/22/2010 11:40:03 PM
this is stupid.
3/23/2010 10:44:13 AM
^i agree.we're already paying for those stupid save the watts commercials with the lightbulb man. the problem is here:
3/23/2010 10:56:10 AM
http://www.ncuc.commerce.state.nc.us/consumer/complaints.htmCall or email them to complain.
3/23/2010 10:59:07 AM
^^Hold on a second, all the politicians tell me that the utility companies won't pass on the new costs to the consumer.lied to again[Edited on March 23, 2010 at 11:38 AM. Reason : ^thanks, I did complain.]
3/23/2010 11:32:18 AM
an old refridgerator can use upwards of 1,500kWh a year, maybe more if it's running outside (which is where a lot of old refridgerators are kept.) New fridges typically consume a fifth of that. Getting rid of 100,000 refridgerators would help delay the installation of additional generation and transmission capacity.This is a lot less shady than the installation of additional regulator banks for load management that a lot of utilities are doing now. You're paying a hell of lot more for them to be installed, and they have the dirty little secret in that they can be boosted up to make you consume MORE power during off-peak times in an effort to boost revenue for the utility.
3/23/2010 12:37:16 PM
^all well and good, but if the refrigerators are so inefficient people will throw them out anyway due to the cost of operating them.Here's the reply I got:
3/26/2010 4:06:10 PM
Personally, I support thisA) I live in Charlotte and am a Duke Energy customerB) I own stock in Progress Energy
3/26/2010 4:12:18 PM
ass
3/26/2010 4:27:19 PM
meh...my dividend checks for 2009 totalled like $160
3/26/2010 4:31:59 PM
when i was first saw this thread i thought it was about the show "Fringe" and I was like but then i actually read the title and I was like
3/26/2010 4:41:09 PM
3/26/2010 5:50:19 PM
^I wonder how many people don't know even know how to spell refrigerator? And if they don't know how much energy their fridge consumes well so f*cking what. Should we put rebate programs into effect b/c people are stupid? (well we might but) we shouldn't.
3/26/2010 9:53:37 PM
3/27/2010 10:04:03 AM
3/27/2010 10:12:39 PM
^ That is less true over-time. Nowadays, almost everything in your home draws a specific power, as long as the voltage is within the margins. Only incandescent lightbulbs and dumb power-bricks will consume more power. Maybe a desk fan. Resistive heating systems, such as your oven or space heater will draw more power while on, but thanks to the thermostat, they will spend more time off, equaling out. All our modern technology, from computers to TVs to CFLs, use power regulators which will reduce their current consumption as voltage increases. This would reduce power consumption overall as voltage increased and wire-losses from current decreased. Am I forgetting anything? The only thing I am unsure of is AC motors. But, since most of these will be rigged for a fixed speed of operation, they must be moderating their power consumption somehow.[Edited on March 28, 2010 at 5:25 PM. Reason : .,.]
3/28/2010 5:23:14 PM
power supplies don't regulate current consumption; they assume that the voltage supplied by the utility is well regulated and convert the AC voltage into DC. some high-end power supplies have harmonic filters in them to remove transient currents and correct power factor problems, but these do absolutely nothing to regulate a raised source voltage. If the utility jacks up the source voltage, the power consumption of the entire device will increase.What you said about thermostat regulated devices is true for strip heat loads like ovens, but it's not true for heat pumps and AC units. cranking up the power output of the compressor and the fans won't cause the heat exchanger and condensor units to become more efficient, so that added power is being wasted.
3/28/2010 8:58:18 PM
3/28/2010 9:00:02 PM
^^ even if they jack the voltage to 125 at non peak times, your still only looking at a small number of appliances that will cost more to run. Plus when all the AC and Heat pumps are running partially defines peak time.Modern lighting sources will have a ballast which will limit actual power consumed.
3/29/2010 3:22:18 PM
eleusis, you are absolutely wrong on most counts. Most electronics today have switched mode power supplies which will output a constant voltage to the electronics regardless of the voltage they get in. And thanks to the miracle of inductance, a higher or lower line voltage will have very little impact upon power consumption. And like I said, while such power supplies used to be rare, only found in PCs, they are now found in everything from TVs to cell phone chargers to CFLs. Back in the day, if the line voltage increased, your TV would get brighter. That is no longer the case, as the power is now being regulated by electronics. As for AC motors, I am not certain. But I suspect the rotational speed of the motors in your home is being set by the frequency, not the voltage, of the grid. Does anyone else here know for certain? Other than eleusis, which apparently has never heard of a switched-mode power supply.
3/29/2010 4:07:55 PM
3/29/2010 6:40:06 PM
3/29/2010 10:26:44 PM
3/29/2010 11:35:01 PM
Oh shit ITS ON!!! Battle of the electrical engineering nerds.I'll go ask Big Jim tomorrow. I am sure he will be quite amused at this thread. While not most qualified to speak on this topic, surely he will have an opinion.
3/30/2010 12:02:26 AM
you haven't designed shit, kid, so don't pull that shit.
3/30/2010 12:14:29 AM
All homes require an ancient fridge.It doesn't necessarily have to be plugged in.But as you plug it in and stock it with beer, you earn bonus American Points.I'm just saying.[Edited on March 30, 2010 at 12:24 AM. Reason : ]
3/30/2010 12:24:27 AM