User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » Terminal Server Licensing question Page [1]  
aaronburro
Sup, B
53146 Posts
user info
edit post

I've got some screwy stuff happening with a TS client. I think it's related to licensing. The server is running Windows 2003. We used to run Windows 2000, and we have an unlimited DEVICE license. We've also got the standard 10device/user licenses that came with 2003. Can we use the 2000 license on the 2003 server?

4/2/2010 11:30:04 AM

Apocalypse
All American
17555 Posts
user info
edit post

I realize this thread is about to get moved from Sports Talk....which I do not dispute. Hear me out, maybe I can offer some insight.

I am in outside sales, which is currently salary+commission, but will move into straight commission starting at the beginning of July 2010. I have been in this position since July 2009. I have competition from several direct manufacturing sales reps, large distributors, and local distributors. Here are the advantages and disadvantages of each:

Direct Advantages: Immediate knowledge of new technology, no middle man mark up, one shipping bill (paid by manufacturer or buyer of goods), access to larger range of non-commodity items, control inventory, have access to many distributors that can effectively sell their goods which increases market share, and set prices of commodity they manufacture.

Direct disadvantages: Typically have 1-3 sales reps per region (i.e. southeast, mid-atlantic, northeast, etc.) limiting the number of accounts they can successfully manage/cold-call, lack physical customer service or physical technical service available to or affordable for smaller users or altogether, are sometimes not trustworthy because they will go in behind their distributors that sell their commodity to one account in large quantities (i.e. they missed a big account, and have found out about it through a distributor selling their particular product) which leads to the distributor not selling their product anymore, have too many distributors selling the product ultimately driving the set price down through deviations, possibly rely on distributors to actually sell the product, and competition from other direct sources.

Large distributor advantages: have access to other commodities that go hand in hand with other manufacturers (poor example- grocery stores sell milk as well as cereal), get direct pricing, many locations regionally or nationally easing the shipping burden of buyers with multiple locations, personal service either customer or technical, many sales reps that are able to cover a broader territory, access to multiple manufacturers of the same commodity allowing to keep prices in check, service programs that smaller companies can't offer and direct providers can't match in price or value, and experts of many many commodities as opposed to one or a few.

Large distributor disadvantages: smaller local distributors creating price wars (think Michael Scott Paper Co vs Dunder-Mifflin), direct mfg's going in behind and stealing business, limited access to all of the mfg's (you won't find Harris Teeter name brands in Food Lion and visa versa), can't truly set prices because it's based on both supply and demand, territory management, and tough growth prospects in slower economies (this is true for direct as well really)

Local distributor advantages: Typically a good ol' boy setting where the seller and the buyer know each other for years (this does happen at all levels, but mostly at the local level), local folks are right down the street and can be used in emergencies, if the local guy buys at high enough volumes then there is no shipping charge to the end user, and access to both direct mfg's and large distributors.

Local distributor disadvantages: easily beaten in price, array of commodities, array of technology, lack of trained staff, low cash flow, etc etc etc.

This is what I have noticed in my six months, I am sure there are plenty more that need mentioning. The way I am setting myself apart as a sales person is this: I go after the big accounts right now while I am new. The big accounts, if I land them, will take care of me while I am new and building a customer base. The money made off of those allows me to focus free time on smaller accounts that get me higher margins. I build up big accounts, I would like to have 5-10 of these, then get 20-30 medium accounts. If I lose 1 or 2 big accounts, the 20-30 medium accounts keep me afloat while I go after new big accounts. I don't really waste time on small accounts simply because they basically pay for breakfast or something really small.

I will say this, if you can't get a big account in the first 6-8 months (assuming you have cash flow that you can ride this long) you could be in a world of trouble. If you can get one, it will really make going after the others a lot more enjoyable and less stressful. It's simply just very exhausting wasting any time on anything other than big accounts in the very beginning. You work just as hard on the medium sized accounts and see 1/3 to 1/36 of the money in my situation.

If you have any other questions, you can PM me. I hope this helps in the slightest!




[Edited on April 2, 2010 at 11:36 AM. Reason : OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO POWER PACK OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PACK]

4/2/2010 11:33:18 AM

aaronburro
Sup, B
53146 Posts
user info
edit post

fuck me, move it to Tech Talk

4/2/2010 11:33:33 AM

ncstatetke
All American
41128 Posts
user info
edit post

2000 turned out to be a flop...K-Mart was really the only guy who panned out. I mean, Stromile Swift? DerMarr Johnson? Chris Mihm??? It got a little better when you move past the lottery, but not great. Not a single one of the guys outside Martin is anything more than a marginal role player

2003 was one of the best we've ever seen. Lebron, Melo, Bosh, D-Wade....

there's really no comparison

[Edited on April 2, 2010 at 11:37 AM. Reason : ,]

4/2/2010 11:36:48 AM

Master_Yoda
All American
3626 Posts
user info
edit post

I was like, coming from TT a second ago, is this a late april fools joke?

4/2/2010 11:37:14 AM

wolfAApack
All American
9980 Posts
user info
edit post

words

4/2/2010 12:27:38 PM

Perlith
All American
7620 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Can we use the 2000 license on the 2003 server?"


Technically or legally speaking? Technically, your 2003 server is going to use the 10 CALs you were given, not the unlimited. Legally speaking, call up Microsoft sales rep and get something in writing. They do offer unlimited CALS 2003 servers and can probably work with you to upgrade your existing CALS at a discount.

4/2/2010 7:42:03 PM

 Message Boards » Tech Talk » Terminal Server Licensing question Page [1]  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.39 - our disclaimer.