AstralAdvent All American 9999 Posts user info edit post |
Is there a good one?
This has been an AstralAdvent inquiry 12/16/2010 3:47:57 PM |
Ribs All American 10713 Posts user info edit post |
I, too, am interested in this 12/16/2010 4:43:29 PM |
Novicane All American 15416 Posts user info edit post |
they are all pretty bad. 12/17/2010 8:30:49 AM |
FroshKiller All American 51911 Posts user info edit post |
The first-run PS3s are fantastic.
[Edited on December 17, 2010 at 8:37 AM. Reason : But you can get a damn PS2 for the price of a nice dinner for two.] 12/17/2010 8:36:59 AM |
AstralAdvent All American 9999 Posts user info edit post |
Do they still make backwards compatible PS3s? or can i mod them to be? i don't care about online play
I'm AstralAdvent and i approved this message. 12/17/2010 8:40:57 AM |
Smath74 All American 93278 Posts user info edit post |
it pissed me off that they made PS3's unable to run PS2 games. I mean i have both systems, but it would be nice to be able to play both games in one console. 12/17/2010 1:06:38 PM |
AstralAdvent All American 9999 Posts user info edit post |
Yeah if I got a ps two id have to figure out how to hook up our receiver I think it only has hdmi and optical connections
I really just want to play mgs three and four...
I'm astraladvent and I approved this message. 12/17/2010 2:34:14 PM |
TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148442 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "it pissed me off that they made PS3's unable to run PS2 games" |
lol...gg Sony12/17/2010 2:47:59 PM |
Specter All American 6575 Posts user info edit post |
my 60gig PS3 is backwards-compatible what what 12/17/2010 3:24:08 PM |
TKE-Teg All American 43410 Posts user info edit post |
^^It was intentional.
^When I bought mine I wanted a backwards compatible one, but I didn't feel like paying a premium for a used PS3. 12/17/2010 3:34:41 PM |
TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148442 Posts user info edit post |
intentional? why? 12/17/2010 3:39:23 PM |
TKE-Teg All American 43410 Posts user info edit post |
b/c PS2 sales are still fairly healthy. They briefly sold a model that can play PS2 games. Specter mentioned having one. And b/c they have this ability they can sell 2nd hand for $400-500 easy.
12/17/2010 3:46:15 PM |
peakseeker All American 2900 Posts user info edit post |
mine does and i paid 700 bucks for it many years ago 12/17/2010 3:55:54 PM |
GraniteBalls Aging fast 12262 Posts user info edit post |
From what I understand, new PS3's can still play ps2 games. They just have a limited compatibility list because it's a software emulation.
The 60gb ones from back in the day, actually had the ps2 hardware in them for backwards play. This was a cost that kept the ps3 so high. Once they cut that out, there was a price drop. 12/17/2010 4:55:54 PM |
Specter All American 6575 Posts user info edit post |
^ wrong. new "slim" PS3's dont support software emulation, so no backwards compatibility at all.
[Edited on December 17, 2010 at 5:18 PM. Reason : ] 12/17/2010 5:17:49 PM |
S All American 658 Posts user info edit post |
^^They completely removed the PS2 backwards compatibility in the new PS3 models. Basically, if your PS3 is either slim or has 2 USB ports, it can't play PS2 games.
For emulation, try PCSX2. You'll need to get the BIOS somewhere (torrent). And probably a really good processor and graphics card.
[Edited on December 17, 2010 at 5:23 PM. Reason : hi] 12/17/2010 5:23:31 PM |
JBaz All American 16764 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "my 60gig PS3 is backwards-compatible what what " |
Yup yup, I liked it when I had the same one, but got sick of waiting for GT5 so I sold it last year for exactly the same price I got the ps3 when MGS4 came out. Actually made out 40 bucks since I had walmart giftcard at the time of purchase.
I'm surprised that the newer ps3's aren't backwards compatible.
Also Granite, I think the price of the ps3 was high mainly due to the fact that the main ps3 chip and boards were expensive, as well as the R&D research that was involved. When ps3 first came out, even the 20GB versions was costing sony like 160 bucks per set, I think it was like 110 for the 60GB since it was priced a 100 bucks more.12/17/2010 6:20:37 PM |