dweedle All American 77386 Posts user info edit post |
would have asked in the block user extension thread but it's nearly 2 yrs since the last post
anyone made/know how to make one for Chrome real quick? 1/6/2011 10:03:05 AM |
qntmfred retired 40726 Posts user info edit post |
i spent a few minutes trying to port it once, but i believe frosh was using some Mozilla-specific features so it was going to take some work 1/6/2011 10:13:40 AM |
dweedle All American 77386 Posts user info edit post |
shucks/rats/züt! 1/6/2011 10:28:47 AM |
amac884 All American 25609 Posts user info edit post |
i also spent a few minutes trying to port it once, but i believe frosh was using some Mozilla-specific features so it was going to take some work 1/6/2011 3:56:56 PM |
wdprice3 BinaryBuffonary 45912 Posts user info edit post |
i spent a few minutes reading about people trying to port it once, but frosh said he was using some Mozilla-specific features so it was going to take some work] 1/6/2011 5:47:22 PM |
Ernie All American 45943 Posts user info edit post |
Ain't no umlaut in zut 1/6/2011 5:49:19 PM |
dweedle All American 77386 Posts user info edit post |
it's a halfway crook 1/6/2011 8:36:11 PM |
lewisje All American 9196 Posts user info edit post |
I started looking up how to do it, then I got lazy. 1/6/2011 11:01:31 PM |
kiljadn All American 44690 Posts user info edit post |
I berated Frosh for not making it platform-agnostic
but that didnt sway him into making it platform-agnostic 1/9/2011 1:02:02 AM |
FroshKiller All American 51911 Posts user info edit post |
I suppose I could've written it to work on any implementation of JavaScript, but I had three very good reasons not to!
1. A very fast, native implementation of foreach in Firefox.
2. Native JSON support in Firefox.
3. It's much more than a user blocker, which is a feature I personally dislike and don't care to support, and I wrote the script mostly for myself. I use Firefox, and fuck y'all broke bitches, you can kiss my ass. 1/12/2011 4:20:24 PM |
kiljadn All American 44690 Posts user info edit post |
FroshKiller admits to being a fan of memory leaks ITT 1/12/2011 10:35:47 PM |
FroshKiller All American 51911 Posts user info edit post |
In 3.6+, you're not gonna see memory leaks unless you have some bunk old version of Java and a bunch of add-ons installed. Besides, it's called RAM—it's not expensive. 1/13/2011 8:35:47 AM |
merbig Suspended 13178 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "In 3.6+, you're not gonna see memory leaks unless you have some bunk old version of Java and a bunch of add-ons installed." |
I thought that was the appeal of Firefox. If you're not using an ass load of add-ons, why use it? Excluding IE, really any browser will be faster and better.1/13/2011 6:07:58 PM |
FroshKiller All American 51911 Posts user info edit post |
There are many reasons to use Firefox! I only use four add-ons myself, though. One of those is Firebug, which is far superior to Chrome's built-in dev tools.
I guess the most important reason is because I don't like the idea of relying on a browser built by a gigantic advertising company! 1/14/2011 7:01:53 AM |
kiljadn All American 44690 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "One of those is Firebug, which is far superior to Chrome's built-in dev tools." |
this is a false statement and I DEMAND that you take it back.1/15/2011 2:35:03 PM |