paerabol All American 17118 Posts user info edit post |
Not would of. Come on guys, we're in our 20's 2/27/2012 1:53:28 AM |
BubbleBobble :3 114240 Posts user info edit post |
someone is not familiar with troll's on the interweb's ] 2/27/2012 1:59:59 AM |
0EPII1 All American 42535 Posts user info edit post |
your silly 2/27/2012 3:31:02 AM |
umop-apisdn Snaaaaaake 4549 Posts user info edit post |
Their just not thinking. 2/27/2012 7:28:26 AM |
settledown Suspended 11583 Posts user info edit post |
would'of 2/27/2012 7:29:20 AM |
BigMan157 no u 103353 Posts user info edit post |
2/27/2012 7:38:18 AM |
Str8BacardiL ************ 41752 Posts user info edit post |
wouuldda 2/27/2012 11:16:16 AM |
DROD900 All American 24653 Posts user info edit post |
do what now 2/27/2012 11:17:08 AM |
paerabol All American 17118 Posts user info edit post |
Would have.]
2/27/2012 12:03:50 PM |
DROD900 All American 24653 Posts user info edit post |
should of 2/27/2012 12:06:03 PM |
settledown Suspended 11583 Posts user info edit post |
could of
...beat off to that pic 2/27/2012 12:12:30 PM |
BobbyDigital Thots and Prayers 41777 Posts user info edit post |
My good friend did. 2/27/2012 12:13:21 PM |
jtw208 5290 Posts user info edit post |
also:
the phrase is NOT "... for all intensive purposes"
it is "... for all intents and purposes"
whenever i hear it wrong, I twitch a little 2/27/2012 12:16:50 PM |
BobbyDigital Thots and Prayers 41777 Posts user info edit post |
I thought about writing a grammar ninja twitter bot (or adapting an existing one) that would scan for common misspellings and incorrect phrasing such as "rediculous" or "for all intensive purposes" and flame the shit out of the offender based on a database of insults.
I might still do it one day.
[/evan] 2/27/2012 12:23:36 PM |
TroopofEchos All American 12212 Posts user info edit post |
2/27/2012 12:28:46 PM |