http://www.theagitator.com/2012/06/03/the-costs-of-police-dishonesty/

http://www.civil-rights-law.com/storage/OrderGrantingKnockandTalkSuppression.pdf

6/3/2012 11:05:06 PM

more of what?

6/4/2012 12:18:38 AM

Police not being given the benefit of the doubt in court based simply on being police. Also, being held accountable for lying to get around the law.

Read the links:

Quote :

"The police lied to get into a woman’s home. This isn’t disputed. They then claim she gave them permission to search further. This, she disputes. So it’s her word against the police officer’s"

Judge basically then says, how can I believe you over this citizen, you've already admitted that you're willing to lie to work around the law?

[Edited on June 4, 2012 at 1:11 AM. Reason : asdfs]

6/4/2012 1:09:54 AM

Now the police chief is mad that his officers, who admitted that they lied to gain entrance to the home, were called liars and deemed less credible than the home's resident who says she did not consent to a search.

Shocking that admitting that you're prepared to lie to further your own investigation can damage your credibility.

http://www.news-journalonline.com/news/local/east-volusia/2012/02/22/daytona-police-chief-claims-judge-has-bias-in-drug-case.html

6/5/2012 10:55:33 AM