Attorney Richard Gilbert is the one leading the fight against Mitt Romney and fraud.

https://vimeo.com/46913745

8/4/2012 11:43:23 PM

It's possible that there's something important in there, but I'm not watching a 32 minute long video to find out.

Also, WTF is that guy thinking with his hair?

8/5/2012 9:58:28 AM

I thought the same thing (about his hair) looks like he is stuck in the 1970s. But I still have my respect for the man.

8/5/2012 12:16:34 PM

Why couldn't this go in the Ron Paul thread?

8/6/2012 11:58:12 AM

Because Richard Gilbert is Richard Gilbert and Ron Paul is Ron Paul.

8/6/2012 12:13:23 PM

I listened to the video, and it was convincing...

until it got to NDAA. It looks like Romney's support of the NDAA is the only real basis for the accusations of the illegal indefinite detention camps.

I'm not saying it's constitutional, just that many politicians support that NDAA.

If it were the case that Romney was clearly associated with the Ponzi scheme, that would be something meaningful. But he obviously doesn't have any concrete evidence linking him, or else he would have presented it. He's definitely firing all the ammunition he's got.

8/6/2012 12:35:55 PM

Quote :

" He's definitely firing all the ammunition he's got."

This is the "second" video and he said there is going to be a "third video".

Personally, i didn't catch the first.

But I do recall him saying he is going to put out a third video with more detailed evidence.

8/6/2012 1:37:56 PM

Quote :

"But I do recall him saying he is going to put out a third video with more detailed evidence."

But of what point? If Romney was actually outed on participation in a Ponzi scheme, that would be a huge national event that would turn the the national presidential election on its head.

But this deal about a government cartel building detention centers to hold American citizens who are political opponents of the powerful without due process - we all already knew about that, so what's there to prove?

8/6/2012 2:28:45 PM

Quote :

"But of what point? If Romney was actually outed on participation in a Ponzi scheme, that would be a huge national event that would turn the the national presidential election on its head. But this deal about a government cartel building detention centers to hold American citizens who are political opponents of the powerful without due process - we all already knew about that, so what's there to prove?"

Let's be clear here: An issue is only a big issue if the media says it is.

[Edited on August 6, 2012 at 2:31 PM. Reason : .]

8/6/2012 2:30:41 PM

Richard Gilbert
The Court has Ruled. We have a ruling that States the Court believes it is possible to state a claim that The Voting Rights Act (vote your conscience) may apply to The Convention. The Court requires an Amended Complaint to state the claim. We will both file an Amended Complaint as well as file An Appellate Writ at the same time to seek the guidance of both Courts.

8/7/2012 6:40:09 PM

Richard Gilbert
Throughout the ruling, disguised in legal language, the Judge is clearly saying he thinks we can win. People will not understand because it will confuse them that the motion is granted, but, the Judge went on to say "without prejudice to plaintiffs" which means our case is quite alive.

..

.

8/7/2012 9:36:45 PM

Looks like Judge Carter has granted the RNC's motion to dismiss but WITHOUT PREJUDICE... meaning that they may still be in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1971.

Below is the Ruling Issued by Judge Carter 08-07-2012

"For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.
However, the Court dismisses WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court will afford Plaintiffs a thirdand final opportunity to attempt to sufficiently plead a violation of Section 1971(b) of theVoting Rights Act.See Schreiber Distributing Co. v. Serv-Well Furniture Co., 806 F.2d 1393,1401 (9th Cir. 1986).Because the Court grants Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, the Court also DENIESPlaintiffs’ Ex Parte Application to Expedite Trial [16].Plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint, if at all, on or before August 20, 2012.DATED: August 7, 2012
__________________________________
DAVID O. CARTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 8:12-cv-00927-DOC-JPR Document 35 Filed
08/07/12 Page 20 of 20 Page ID #:492 "

Read the full ruling here:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/102312914/Delegates-vs-RNC-ORDER-GRANTING-DEFENDANTS%E2%80%99-MOTION-TO-DISMISS

8/7/2012 9:47:14 PM

This guy has absolutely nothing. Without prejudice just means that there is a big enough political will with the people to have it heard. They've made an official statement on its legitimacy, and it got dismissed. It's more to make this guy go away than anything. He'll get an appeal and it will get denied and that will be the end of it.

8/7/2012 10:27:10 PM

Richard Gilbert
The FBI is meeting with Arizona delegates to review all election fraud evidence in Arizona. I urge all states to contact the FBI and present your election fraud evidence

8/10/2012 3:19:51 PM

Richard Gilbert
2 hours ago ·

Federal Case Update - We have tentatively won the case on the historic law. The RNC is now engaged in delay tactics. To counter, I am filing an Appellate action tomorrow to seek an Appellate Order requiring the Judge to rule prior to the convention. Yes, I said we have tentatively won the case on the historic law



omg omg omg.

8/16/2012 2:16:58 AM

Richard Gilberts' latest tweets


USA_Patriot_Press @USA_Free_Press
Our Delegates will be making a statement that the Liberty Movement shall never forget
USA_Patriot_Press @USA_Free_Press
The Organized Crime stage is fully set. RNC is panicked by unusual Appellate Court announcement & filed a new brief. We shall wait calmly
USA_Patriot_Press @USA_Free_Press
Our case is alive after all the ammunition has been launched by the RNC and all other parties. Something very big is happening.
USA_Patriot_Press @USA_Free_Press
I continue to fight our case. Win or lose, I believe the Appellate Court is writing a historic ruling - This time for all Americans
USA_Patriot_Press @USA_Free_Press
If I was contacted by the FBI, even last night, about some election fraud evidence, I could not tell you - such investigations are secret

8/30/2012 2:24:49 PM

^ can you give me an "explain it to me like i'm 5" review of that?

8/30/2012 3:23:52 PM

It just means there's going to be a ruling coming soon from the court case against the RNC, and while everything we've ever done comes back negative, this one has a small chance of making history. stay tuned

8/30/2012 4:08:30 PM

Props for being totally realistic in your assessment.

I sincerely hope this guy wins.

[Edited on August 30, 2012 at 7:30 PM. Reason : ]

8/30/2012 7:30:24 PM