I'm just wondering what was your process for choosing the new moderators? I'm not complainin I just wondering. I hope they help make the place better

2/22/2003 8:24:38 PM

bartleby = movie geek

j^2 = car geek

cassthesass = A. Phi so of cousre she's an expert on chit chatting

2/22/2003 9:02:03 PM

i wanna be a mod--or joe won't get a job

2/22/2003 9:08:18 PM

Heh, no mods for Tech-Talk, but then again, there are no real fights or stupidity in there. Soapbox, however, is in desperate need of a mod or two. . . but who would they choose? EVERYONE there fights.

2/22/2003 9:50:02 PM

put wolfeee in study hall

and me in PP

2/22/2003 10:08:32 PM

^^

Soap Box needs a Swiss citizen as a mod.

2/22/2003 10:19:33 PM

Soap Box needs a hardcore conservative as a moderator. Things would then run smoothly.

2/22/2003 11:55:50 PM

well what fun would that be? everyone would just agree and there would be no discussion thus pointless...

2/23/2003 12:04:34 AM

yeah soap box would need a middle-of-the-road person to moderate. getting a conservate or liberal would basically cause mass censorship

2/23/2003 1:35:44 AM

I'm an apathetic moderate, I'll be perfect for the job!

2/23/2003 1:38:03 AM

Fuck this moderator bullshit, what the fuck kind of irresponsible decision-making results in people not even fucking knowing or expecting to be put in the positions?

2/23/2003 1:42:02 AM

I consider myself pretty tolerant. Sure, I do get into the raging discussions and usually choose a side, but that wouldn't affect how I would operate. Oh, wait. Nm, I don't think I can be a mod now. I just went off on salisburyboy. Well there is a first time for everything. Wait, I also went off on InsaneMan a few months ago. Perhaps SoapBox isn't my place for modding.

In that case, I run for Tech-Talk . . . or at least I will nominate rogueleader.

2/23/2003 1:45:40 AM

nobody should moderate the Soap Box... although it would be nice if people moderated themselves in there...

2/23/2003 8:07:19 AM

just because someone has a certain political leaning doesn't mean that the SB will start getting mass censored. I mean, do you think Jake or Joe are politically neutral? Have you seen censorship so far?

2/23/2003 8:42:11 AM

don't ask that question of Theodorus or ApostleNC

2/23/2003 9:03:05 AM

1st amendment for all... the great thing about this board is its lack of censorship.

2/23/2003 9:55:41 AM

You obviously haven't been posting here that long.

2/23/2003 9:58:13 AM

Quote :

"1st amendment for all... the great thing about this board is its lack of censorship."

[cough]BULLSHIT![/cough]. Occasionally they will go on their little tirades where they lock topics and delete posts left and right. You'll see how they are eventually.

2/23/2003 11:44:10 AM

oh yeah, i hate to rehash and old point, but there is no 1st Amendment right on a private board like this one

2/23/2003 12:06:34 PM

gg timswar

people think that the 1st amendment gives them the right to open their mouth anywhere they please and it doesn't

2/23/2003 12:20:31 PM

Oh yeah, I forgot the token "White supremacist copy/paste trolls."

2/23/2003 12:40:46 PM

some of the new moderators post too much

2/23/2003 3:16:00 PM

Quote :

"cassthesass = A. Phi so of cousre she's an expert on chit chatting "

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha

2/23/2003 10:52:22 PM

how about exercizing your moderating privilages and getting rid of those logjam posts in the lounge. if not for at least three threads of literal shit, then for the content at least.

2/23/2003 11:55:22 PM

i wanna moderate the sports talk

2/24/2003 11:41:51 AM

already on top of it monkey.......i sent him warning last night but i guess he didnt listen so his threads are all in the trash bin now

2/24/2003 1:09:22 PM

don't shit on log_jam

seriously.

i find his threads of high value.

2/24/2003 1:34:26 PM

normally i wouldnt care but he made 4 threads (after i asked him to stop making new threads when he made his 3rd one) and he didnt listen

i gave him a warning and he still made another thread....so i got rid of it

2/24/2003 3:57:27 PM

i nominate rogueleader for tech talk.....

isn't the point of soapbox to argue? what would you need a mod in there for?

2/24/2003 5:01:53 PM

please don't put anyone as a mod in tech....I think rogue would be great for it, but I really think it's the sanest section here and doesn't need interference from a mod

2/24/2003 5:18:11 PM

Quote :

"please don't put anyone as a mod in tech....I think rogue would be great for it, but I really think it's the sanest section here and doesn't need interference from a mod"

completely agreed.

-bigginal

2/24/2003 5:34:37 PM

I think it would be ok for someone to be a mod in tech talk as long as the only topics that got deleted were the ones about hook me up with illegal stuff

2/24/2003 5:55:32 PM

Quote :

"Fuck this moderator bullshit, what the fuck kind of irresponsible decision-making results in people not even fucking knowing or expecting to be put in the positions?"

Maybe they let the Wolf Creek people do the deciding...

...if they paid 'em enough.

2/24/2003 7:03:33 PM

2/24/2003 10:37:47 PM

Quote :

"what would you need a mod in there for?"

For people who don't know how to behave. One person posted the same pic about 10 times in the same post. He got suspended. Yesterday, InsaneMan posted the forbidden picture (goats.cx) picture in the SoapBox and was also suspended for doing so.

2/25/2003 12:02:27 AM

Quote :

"please don't put anyone as a mod in tech....I think rogue would be great for it, but I really think it's the sanest section here and doesn't need interference from a mod"

well then, if it's sane enough, the mod won't be interferring... mods are not there to get in the way but to encourage the steady and easy flow of conversation.

2/26/2003 3:58:35 PM

no mods in soapbox...totally defeats the purpose of the soapbox,,,, but if you must get one...... i have a lot of good references









this can be the campaign poster



but i dont think there shoudl be a moderator...but if there is remember:

vote quimby

2/27/2003 3:46:16 AM

fuck that, hes totally non-sensical.

i think you shoud go for the most sensible side all-around... me.

i listen, i preach, i objectify, and i villify.

make me a mod. but not on my spelling merit

2/28/2003 4:26:47 AM

down with synergizer! i have proof of padding and pictures of him with the mayors wife

vote spacechicken

3/1/2003 4:38:37 AM

i'll be scared if yer made moderator alex

3/1/2003 12:39:11 PM

awww whys that? id be a goodie

3/1/2003 3:37:28 PM

Quote :

"You obviously haven't been posting here that long."

you obviously haven't been posting anywhere else. compare this board to other boards where you get flamed for using a cuss word, taking the lords name in vain, or god forbid a nudy pic. you guys are just spoiled by this board, anytime the admins do take action you dont know how you'll ever live again.


and if you really dont believe me, go to http://www.myncsu.com and knock yourselves out

[Edited on March 5, 2003 at 5:17 AM. Reason : myncsu]

3/5/2003 5:14:18 AM

Quote :

"flamed for using a cuss word, taking the lords name in vain, or god forbid a nudy pic"

we don't mod these things.....the code itself takes out cuss words, at least most of them, and we plan on opening those up.....we only mod against racial slurs and obvious bashing of others....when sed correctly, you'd be surprised what I'd (can't speak for everyone) let you get away with

3/5/2003 9:06:02 AM

Quote :

"we don't mod these things.....the code itself takes out cuss words"

contradiction. the code "mods" for you.

3/6/2003 3:26:36 AM

holy goddamn fucking bullshit, not something that keeps you from cussing!!!!!!!!1111111111

3/6/2003 3:52:35 AM

no way

3/6/2003 2:22:03 PM

i love how these kids speak with authority because one day they were like hey i wanna be a moderator, and the kid was like ok.

3/6/2003 3:47:39 PM

for soapbox moderator

3/6/2003 5:22:10 PM

some of these fuckign mods need to pull the poles out of their asses...

4/7/2003 4:24:30 PM

I like how I never got a response to this other than from the new mods themselves

however I do agree with the locking of your topic...there was one about 5 down

[Edited on April 7, 2003 at 4:39 PM. Reason : it happens]

4/7/2003 4:36:02 PM