Page 105

10/24/2012 9:24:26 PM

i love minka

10/24/2012 9:26:52 PM

i don't love aaronburro

10/24/2012 9:47:14 PM

10/24/2012 10:05:37 PM

ok

that is definitely WTF

10/24/2012 10:08:32 PM

How is that allowed on Youtube?! I wanna do that

10/24/2012 10:12:14 PM

10/25/2012 12:13:13 PM

10/25/2012 5:30:30 PM

10/25/2012 6:13:45 PM

10/26/2012 3:21:15 PM

11/20/2012 8:45:48 PM

WTF is wrong with the Chinese?

http://jalopnik.com/5962498/the-chinese-are-using-kids-in-bikinis-to-show-off-cars

That's disgusting

11/25/2012 4:02:05 PM

11/25/2012 4:05:02 PM

Quote :

"WTF is wrong with the Chinese? http://jalopnik.com/5962498/the-chinese-are-using-kids-in-bikinis-to-show-off-cars That's disgusting "

you are seriously perverted.


It's just a kid in a bikini role-playing like a model. It's meant to be funny and cute, not sexual.

11/25/2012 4:36:17 PM

stolen from H8R

11/28/2012 6:15:35 PM

11/29/2012 10:12:18 PM

Having a koala sounds a lot like having a shitty drug addict teenage son fucking up your life.

11/30/2012 7:50:24 PM

I feel bad for that koala

And for the cat

11/30/2012 7:59:32 PM

The dog too, but you'd think a dog could out run the koala if it didn't like shiny objects being put in its ass.

11/30/2012 8:03:43 PM

Youtube is sensoring "Shocking and disgusting" stuff now? Go Team America!

11/30/2012 11:08:59 PM

What does America have to do with an international corporation blocking content?

11/30/2012 11:17:09 PM

Copyrighted material

At the time of uploading a video, YouTube users are shown a screen with the message "Do not upload any TV shows, music videos, music concerts or advertisements without permission, unless they consist entirely of content that you created yourself".[148] Despite this advice, there are still many unauthorized clips of copyrighted material on YouTube. YouTube does not view videos before they are posted online, and it is left to copyright holders to issue a takedown notice pursuant to the terms of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Three successful complaints for copyright infringement against a user account will result in the account and all of its uploaded videos being deleted.[149][150]

Organizations including Viacom, Mediaset, and the English Premier League have filed lawsuits against YouTube, claiming that it has done too little to prevent the uploading of copyrighted material.[151][152][153] Viacom, demanding $1 billion in damages, said that it had found more than 150,000 unauthorized clips of its material on YouTube that had been viewed "an astounding 1.5 billion times". YouTube responded by stating that it "goes far beyond its legal obligations in assisting content owners to protect their works".[154] During the same court battle, Viacom won a court ruling requiring YouTube to hand over 12 terabytes of data detailing the viewing habits of every user who has watched videos on the site. The decision was criticized by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which called the court ruling "a setback to privacy rights".[155][156] In June 2010, Viacom's lawsuit against Google was rejected in a summary judgment, with U.S. federal Judge Louis L. Stanton stating that Google was protected by provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Viacom announced its intention to appeal the ruling.[157]

On April 5, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reinstated the case, allowing Viacom's lawsuit against Google to be heard in court again.[158]

In August 2008, a US court ruled in Lenz v. Universal Music Corp. that copyright holders cannot order the removal of an online file without first determining whether the posting reflected fair use of the material. The case involved Stephanie Lenz from Gallitzin, Pennsylvania, who had made a home video of her 13-month-old son dancing to Prince's song "Let's Go Crazy", and posted the 29-second video on YouTube.[159]

In the case of Smith v. Summit Entertainment LLC, professional singer Matt Smith sued Summit Entertainment for the wrongful use of copyright takedown notice on YouTube. He asserted seven causes of action, and four were ruled in Smith's favor.[160]

In April 2012, a court in Hamburg ruled that YouTube could be held responsible for copyrighted material posted by its users. The performance rights organization GEMA argued that YouTube had not done enough to prevent the uploading of German copyrighted music. YouTube responded by stating: "We remain committed to finding a solution to the music licensing issue in Germany that will benefit artists, composers, authors, publishers and record labels, as well as the wider YouTube community".[161]
Content ID

In June 2007, YouTube began trials of a system for automatic detection of uploaded videos that infringe copyright. The system was regarded by Google CEO Eric Schmidt as necessary for resolving lawsuits such as the one from Viacom, which alleged that YouTube profited from pirated content.[162] The system, which became known as Content ID, creates an ID File for copyrighted audio and video material, and stores it in a database. When a video is uploaded, it is checked against the database, and flags the video as a copyright violation if a match is found. When this occurs, the content owner has the choice of blocking the video to make it unviewable, tracking the viewing statistics of the video, or adding advertisements to the video. YouTube describes Content ID as "very accurate in finding uploads that look similar to reference files that are of sufficient length and quality to generate an effective ID File".[163] Content ID accounts for over a third of the monetized views on YouTube.[164]

An independent test in 2009 uploaded multiple versions of the same song to YouTube, and concluded that while the system was "surprisingly resilient" in finding copyright violations in the audio tracks of videos, it was not infallible.[165] The use of Content ID to remove material automatically has led to controversy in some cases, as the videos have not been checked by a human for fair use.[166] If a YouTube user disagrees with a decision by Content ID, it is possible to fill in a form disputing the decision.[167] YouTube has cited the effectiveness of Content ID as one of the reasons why the site's rules were modified in December 2010 to allow some users to upload videos of unlimited length.[168]
Controversial content

YouTube has also faced criticism over the offensive content in some of its videos. The uploading of videos containing defamation, pornography, and material encouraging criminal conduct is prohibited by YouTube's terms of service.[147] Controversial content has included that pertaining to Holocaust denial and the Hillsborough disaster, in which 96 football fans from Liverpool were crushed to death in 1989.[169][170]

YouTube relies on its users to flag the content of videos as inappropriate, and a YouTube employee will view a flagged video to determine whether it violates the site's terms of service.[147] In July 2008, the Culture and Media Committee of the House of Commons of the United Kingdom stated that it was "unimpressed" with YouTube's system for policing its videos, and argued that "proactive review of content should be standard practice for sites hosting user-generated content". YouTube responded by stating:

"We have strict rules on what's allowed, and a system that enables anyone who sees inappropriate content to report it to our 24/7 review team and have it dealt with promptly. We educate our community on the rules and include a direct link from every YouTube page to make this process as easy as possible for our users. Given the volume of content uploaded on our site, we think this is by far the most effective way to make sure that the tiny minority of videos that break the rules come down quickly."[171]

In October 2010, U.S. Congressman Anthony Weiner urged YouTube to take down from its website videos of imam Anwar al-Awlaki, saying that by hosting al-Awlaki's messages, "We are facilitating the recruitment of homegrown terror".[172] British security minister Pauline Neville-Jones commented: "These Web sites would categorically not be allowed in the U.K. They incite cold-blooded murder, and as such are surely contrary to the public good." In November 2010, YouTube removed from its site some of the hundreds of videos featuring al-Awlaki's calls to jihad. It stated that it had removed videos that violated the site's guidelines prohibiting "dangerous or illegal activities such as bomb-making, hate speech and incitement to commit violent acts", or came from accounts "registered by a member of a designated foreign terrorist organization".[173] In December 2010, YouTube added "promotes terrorism" to the list of reasons that users can give when flagging a video as inappropriate.[174]
User comments

Most videos enable users to leave comments, and these have attracted attention for the negative aspects of both their form and content. In 2006, Time praised Web 2.0 for enabling "community and collaboration on a scale never seen before", and added that YouTube "harnesses the stupidity of crowds as well as its wisdom. Some of the comments on YouTube make you weep for the future of humanity just for the spelling alone, never mind the obscenity and the naked hatred".[175] The Guardian in 2009 described users' comments on YouTube as:

Juvenile, aggressive, misspelled, sexist, homophobic, swinging from raging at the contents of a video to providing a pointlessly detailed description followed by a LOL, YouTube comments are a hotbed of infantile debate and unashamed ignorance – with the occasional burst of wit shining through.[176]

In September 2008, The Daily Telegraph commented that YouTube was "notorious" for "some of the most confrontational and ill-formed comment exchanges on the internet", and reported on YouTube Comment Snob, "a new piece of software that blocks rude and illiterate posts".[177] The Huffington Post noted in April 2012 that finding comments on YouTube that appear "offensive, stupid and crass" to the "vast majority" of the people is hardly difficult.[178]

11/30/2012 11:28:51 PM

Yeah....I'm not reading that. If you read it and didn't just copy & paste how bout a synopsis

11/30/2012 11:30:59 PM

synopsis: America has to do with an international corporation blocking content

11/30/2012 11:36:26 PM

SENSORING

11/30/2012 11:41:34 PM

^^all that response tells me is that you're capable of copy and paste.

If you read that giant wall of text above and wish to engage in civil discourse then it would be helpful to provide 2-3 sentences to explain what it is saying.

As far as I can tell it's just a splattering of incidents in which people, politicians and news media outlets have urged Youtube to change it's policies. Nothing I have read (I just spot read sections) suggest the US government has a law stating that Youtube must comply with decency standards, censoring, etc.

[Edited on November 30, 2012 at 11:45 PM. Reason : ]

11/30/2012 11:45:26 PM

Google generally doesn't give a shit about what governments want them to do, so stop baing so dramatic.

If its possible for genie boy sex to not be over dramatic.

12/1/2012 12:29:46 AM

You all are the worst fucking trolls I've ever seen on the internet. You argue about any fucking thing I post.

12/1/2012 3:16:30 AM

http://i49.tinypic.com/214pq8w.gif

I immediately regret posting this

12/2/2012 12:13:12 PM

hmmmm....

12/2/2012 12:19:41 PM

^^ I don't see the haha. Granted, I couldn't watch it past the point when I realized what he was stepping on.

12/2/2012 3:32:04 PM

12/2/2012 3:55:08 PM

i didnt think haha was an adjective, but upon reviewing the first page of this thread it does seem some keep the post somewhat humorous. with that said, please bleach page 103 from my brain.

12/2/2012 4:17:22 PM

Facebook takes down picture: Woman in bathtub had big elbows not breasts

12/2/2012 4:41:20 PM

^oh no, now where will I go to see big breasted women if not Facebook?

12/2/2012 5:12:05 PM

12/7/2012 3:21:12 PM

12/10/2012 8:30:54 PM

i don't even want to know what kind of medical issues she'll have in 15 years

12/10/2012 9:06:34 PM

^I know right. Fried chicken can only exacerbate her health issues.

12/10/2012 9:36:33 PM

[Edited on December 11, 2012 at 7:14 AM. Reason : kk]

12/11/2012 7:09:17 AM

Is there a video of that?

12/11/2012 11:24:30 AM

Quote :

""

stolen laptop alert

12/11/2012 11:36:21 AM

12/20/2012 1:53:09 PM

^he's just mad he's not gettin' any

12/20/2012 1:54:25 PM

he's just a slow undresser

got a chick right beside him

12/20/2012 2:49:42 PM

Quote :

"is there a video of that?"

http://cdllife.com/2012/video/video-truck-drivers-dashcam-captures-shocking-sight/

12/20/2012 4:35:02 PM

1/3/2013 11:05:25 PM

ewwww

1/3/2013 11:07:46 PM

that is one fat ass

1/3/2013 11:53:05 PM

it looks really weird from behind...like some type of animal.

But I bet it's a lot of fun in bed, from behind

1/3/2013 11:55:47 PM