the dizzle Veteran 498 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "commit permanent laryngitis(sp?) against my campaign by the CIA" |
hahah this guy has to be one of those poor few that the aliens did anal probing on...
lol how would you go about commiting treason against 130 galaxies...
[enter salisbury with some witty comment]
[Edited on February 17, 2004 at 1:50 PM. Reason : ]2/17/2004 1:48:49 PM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
You must be on whatever that asian guy is if you can't see that both towers are visible and standing in this clip:
http://www.lebensaspekte.de/
video also here (with discussion): http://100777.com/node/view/243
CNN confirms this footage was shot at 9:04 a.m.:
Quote : | "American Free Press contacted CNN to determine exactly when the footage was filmed. CNN's Public Affairs Department confirmed that the explosion shown in the footage occurred immediately after the second plane had crashed into the South Tower. When asked if the footage was taken at 9:04 a. m., the CNN archivist said "that's correct."
When asked if CNN could offer any explanation about what might have caused the blast that soared higher than the 47-story WTC 7 in the foreground, the archivist said: "We can't figure it out."
http://100777.com/node/view/243" |
[Edited on February 17, 2004 at 3:36 PM. Reason : ..]2/17/2004 3:23:37 PM |
brianj320 All American 9166 Posts user info edit post |
hahahaha you are such a troll 2/17/2004 3:44:24 PM |
brianj320 All American 9166 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "no actually we only have 1 blind person here and that is u, salis. the 2nd tower is not CLEARLY standing and if it is, would u be so kind to point it out to all of us blind folk? how bout a different angle? o wait, a different angle would prove that u r wrong and that there was no explosion. i love how u use a video clip that suits ur theory of explosives being used but it it clearly doesnt show the other tower standing. and by the way, all those dust-clouds are from the tower behind collapsing, but maybe ur too blind to that fact cause it is disproving your conspiracy bull.
and also, if u look behind the first tower at the dust clouds, you will see that the dust clouds are eminating up and out, away from the buildings. that is clear proof that a building is in the process of falling. watch controlled demolitions of skyscrapers on video and you will see that dust clouds eminate up and out away from the site. - brianj320" |
Quote : | "Clearly there is only one building standing. - CaelNCSU" |
Quote : | "and no.. it's not CLEARLY visible in this video at all - Officer Cat" |
Quote : | "Quit making shit up. - msb2ncsu" |
and about this statement: Quote : | "CNN confirms this footage was shot at 9:04 a.m.:" |
i'm most certain CNN did shoot that footage but all you are doing is showing a 2 second clip looping over and over showing what you think to be explosives going off. in reality however, the dust clouds are from the building collapsing. no one believes you that the other building is standing cause the fact is, it is not.
[Edited on February 17, 2004 at 3:54 PM. Reason : more]2/17/2004 3:51:29 PM |
1337 b4k4 All American 10033 Posts user info edit post |
So sal, tell us. If both towers really are there ( I still don't see it) then what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?
[Edited on February 17, 2004 at 4:01 PM. Reason : asdf] 2/17/2004 4:00:35 PM |
msb2ncsu All American 14033 Posts user info edit post |
This is what I see. The green is the building, the orange is the two damage spots that exist on the same tower. You can see these spots in this other photo that shows your mystery cloud. Compare the size of the tower with the "pyramid topped" building in the right.
[Edited on February 17, 2004 at 4:44 PM. Reason : .]
2/17/2004 4:43:50 PM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
Shrub warns those who want to investigate the facts about 9/11...video link: http://100777.com/media/shrub.rm
[Edited on February 17, 2004 at 11:03 PM. Reason : ..] 2/17/2004 10:37:10 PM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
US planning to recruit one in 24 Americans as citizen spies (Sydney Morning Herald article):
Quote : | "The Bush Administration aims to recruit millions of United States citizens as domestic informants in a program likely to alarm civil liberties groups.
The Terrorism Information and Prevention System, or TIPS, means the US will have a higher percentage of citizen informants than the former East Germany through the infamous Stasi secret police. The program would use a minimum of 4 per cent of Americans to report "suspicious activity".
...The Patriot Act already provides for a person's home to be searched without that person being informed that a search was ever performed, or of any surveillance devices that were implanted.
At state and local levels the TIPS program will be co-ordinated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which was given sweeping new powers, including internment, as part of the Reagan Administration's national security initiatives. Many key figures of the Reagan era are part of the Bush Administration.
The creation of a US "shadow government", operating in secret, was another Reagan national security initiative.
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/07/14/1026185141232.html" |
[Edited on February 17, 2004 at 11:03 PM. Reason : ..]2/17/2004 11:02:41 PM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
FBI Admits: No Evidence Links 'Hijackers' to 9-11 (American Free Press article):
Quote : | "After seven months of non-stop declarations by U.S. government spokesmen that there exists solid proof tying 19 Muslim men to plotting the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, FBI Director Robert Mueller has now admitted quite the opposite.
That 19 Muslim men who have apparently disappeared have been named as the hijackers is not in doubt.
What is in doubt is whether those 19 men were actually plotting anything, either individually or together.
The amazing possibility remains that others carried out the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, using the identities of the 19 Muslims who have been assigned guilt in the tragedy.
In an April 19 speech delivered to the Common wealth Club in San Francisco, Mueller said that the purported hijackers, in his words, “left no paper trial.” The FBI director stated flatly:
"In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper—either here in the United States or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere—that mentioned any aspect of the Sept. 11 plot."
In describing Mueller’s evidence fiasco, Los Angeles Times reporters Erich Lichtblau and Josh Meyer, whose article was reprinted in The Washington Post on April 30, note that:
"Law enforcement officials say that while they have been able to reconstruct the movements of the hijackers before the attacks—all legal except for a few speeding tickets—they have found no evidence of their actual plotting."
http://www.americanfreepress.net/051302/FBI_Admits__No_Evidence_/fbi_admits__no_evidence_.html " |
2/17/2004 11:17:15 PM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
U.S. lies shouldn't be leading us into battle again (Toronto Star article):
Quote : | "So you wonder why so many Canadians are opposed to the U.S. plans to attack Iraq? It's not that we're weak-kneed wimps of Canuckistan, or bleeding-heart pacifists, or saps who actually believe Saddam, to repeat some of the more boorish epithets.
Whatever our other reasons for opposing the war, we're also skeptics, remembering the long history of official lies that have served as a smokescreen for U.S. government adventurism in other places and times.
http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2003/02/1575536.php" |
2/17/2004 11:33:43 PM |
UberCool All American 3457 Posts user info edit post |
if i were one of the "governement spies," i'd report random polititians--preferably those who supported the patriot act--of suspicious activities. like looking shifty on television or something. just to mess with their minds. and prove a point, hopefully 2/18/2004 12:03:56 AM |
1337 b4k4 All American 10033 Posts user info edit post |
Ladies and gentlemen I give you the Best of Salisbury Boy.
Use low quality media, which is damaging to user systems and easy to forge, fake and alter, and get it from highly "unbiased" sources
ignore his own statements, beliefs and ideas when it suits him
Quote : | ""You would rather stick your head in the sand and go along with the crowd believe the lies of the mass media and government"" |
Quote : | "Here is the transcript from CNN's website
The transcript is also available at the following source: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/12/20011204-17.html
Bush's comments are confirmed here as well: http://www.guardian.co.uk/september11/story/0,11209,612354,00.html
Here is something interesting that Donald Rumsfeld said in an interview with Parade magazine: ... http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Nov2001/t11182001_t1012pm.html"
Ponder what Bush said to the UN. ... http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/11/10/ret.bush.un.transcript/
The Chicago Sun-Times reports
The American Free Press reported
http://9news.com/newsroom/13294.html
-Chicago Tribune (11/09/01)
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/10/20011026-9.html
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Sep2001/t09142001_t914irby.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/graphics/attack/hijackers.html
BBC transcript, quoted portion is at very bottom of linked BBC webpag
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/events/newsnight/1645527.stm
This is an ABC News.com May/2001 story:
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/jointchiefs_010501.html
Dan Rather: "Tom Kennedy, a rescue worker with the National Urban Search and Rescue which is part of FEMA..."
Tom Kennedy: "We are currently one of the first teams that was deployed to support the city of New York for this disaster. We arrived on late Monday night and went into action on Tuesday morning. And not until today did we get a full opportunity to work the entire site....."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1550366.stm
http://en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depleted_uranium
http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/medsearch/FocusAreas/depleted_uranium.shtml
http://science.howstuffworks.com/bunker-buster3.htm
AP Nov11/03; CNN June20/02
http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/gen.america.under.attack/
Sydney Morning Herald
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/12/25/1040511092926.html
http://infowars.com/Video/911/wtc7_pbs.WMV [the video is from PBS]
in the PBS film.
Eyewitness testimony suggests bombs were in the WTC towers (BBC news):
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1537500.stm
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/jointchiefs_010501.html
http://sashimi.cs.berkeley.edu/wtc/pld/worldtrade_plane2.wmv
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/world/02/september_11/where_were_you_when/html/11.stm
Tony Blair also claims to have seen the first plane that hit the WTC on television the day of the attacks (BBC News article
American Free Press
seismographs at Columbia University
BBC News article on the collapse of the WTC towers:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1579092.stm
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/warningmemo020516.html
from the U.S. Army Military District of Washington Web site):
http://www.mdw.army.mil/news/Contingency_Planning.html
Condi Rice said
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1537500.stm
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2001/12/1211_wirepentagon.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/world/02/september_11/where_were_you_when/html/11.stm
http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0112/04/se.04.html
N.Y. Daily News, 4/16/02
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,819931,00.html
New York Press article:
http://www.nypress.com/16/53/news&columns/feature.cfm
CBS News article:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/12/17/eveningnews/main589137.shtml
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/bush/story/0,8224,718311,00.html
This can be seen from news reports from local news channels in Oklahoma City.
Interviewed eyewitnesses reported
John Swinton, former Chief of Staff, The New York Times, circa 1880
http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/11/28/afghanistan.drugs.reut/index.html
New York Press article
http://www.nypress.com/14/50/taki/bunker.cfm"
http://www.democrats.com/view.cfm?id=7706
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/07/14/1026185141232.html
http://www.americanfreepress.net/051302/FBI_Admits__No_Evidence_/fbi_admits__no_evidence_.html " |
Dodge questions
Quote : | "So sal, tell us. If both towers really are there ( I still don't see it) then what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?" |
We're still waiting for an answer salisburyboy
and your author for the herald sounds like such a reliable and dependable source:
Quote : | "Ritt Goldstein is an investigative journalist and a former leader in the movement for US law enforcement accountability. He has lived in Sweden since 1997, seeking political asylum there, saying he was the victim of life-threatening assaults in retaliation for his accountability efforts. His application has been supported by the European Parliament, five of Sweden's seven big political parties, clergy, and Amnesty and other rights groups." |
And correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't teh j00s part of the great conspiracy sal? What are you doing using them as sources?2/18/2004 12:06:25 AM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
"Political correctness is really a subjective list put together by the few to rule the many – a list of things one must think, say, or do. It affronts the right of the individual to establish his or her own beliefs. Purveyors of political correctness will, in the final analysis, not even allow others their judgments… They celebrate "difference," but they will not allow people truly to be different – to think differently, and to say what they think."
--Mark Berley, Argos, Spring 1998 2/19/2004 2:11:54 PM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
"The high-minded man must care more for the truth than for what people think."
--Aristotle 2/19/2004 2:15:10 PM |
msb2ncsu All American 14033 Posts user info edit post |
You fail to respond to the critiques of your "evidence". You complain because you think people fail to pay attention to the "evidence" you put before them but you fail to pay attention to any refutes of your evidence. You can't have it both ways.
All I want you to do is point out the second building in the picutre because I (and many others) just don't see a second building. 2/19/2004 2:15:46 PM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
"The man who fears no truths has nothing to fear from lies."
--Sir Francis Bacon 2/19/2004 2:23:18 PM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
"The Supreme Court is steadily eroding the protections against police excess promised by the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution."
--Dan Baum 2/19/2004 2:34:58 PM |
brianj320 All American 9166 Posts user info edit post |
msb he can't prove any of what he is saying. all he is doing is throwing out all these quotes and ridiculus nonsense. i'm starting to think the reason he is doing this is to throw us off. he can't admit to himself that he is wrong; he can't admit to himself that we aren't falling for his conspiracy bull. that's why he provides very little of his thoughts and what he actually thinks.
to you salisburyboy, the fact is, no one in their right mind believes for any moment that what you are saying is true and is what really happened. you say you have all this evidence but you haven't provided anything but holeless, uncredited, edited crap. you can't answer directly some of the most basic questions posed to you cause you say they are ridiculous and you dont want to waste time answering them. by you refusing to answer them, you indirectly show you don't know what you are talking about. statements you quote, and even what you say disprove the most common of physics and engineering laws. i think it is time to stop with all this until you have actual, real evidence that prove everything you're saying is true. 2/19/2004 2:43:57 PM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
Seismic evidence and pools of molten steel found at WTC (American Free Press article):
Quote : | "American Free Press has learned of pools of “molten steel” found at the base of the collapsed twin towers weeks after the collapse. Although the energy source for these incredibly hot areas has yet to be explained, New York seismometers recorded huge bursts of energy, which caused unexplained seismic “spikes” at the beginning of each collapse.
These spikes suggest that massive underground explosions may have literally knocked the towers off their foundations, causing them to collapse.
In the basements of the collapsed towers, where the 47 central support columns connected with the bedrock, hot spots of “literally molten steel” were discovered more than a month after the collapse. Such persistent and intense residual heat, 70 feet below the surface, in an oxygen starved environment, could explain how these crucial structural supports failed.
Peter Tully, president of Tully Construction of Flushing, N.Y., told AFP that he saw pools of “literally molten steel” at the World Trade Center
http://americanfreepress.net/09_03_02/NEW_SEISMIC_/new_seismic_.html" |
[Edited on February 19, 2004 at 2:56 PM. Reason : ..]2/19/2004 2:56:05 PM |
brianj320 All American 9166 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "While steel is often tested for evidence of explosions, despite numerous eyewitness reports of explosions in the towers" |
so if there were all these "eyewitnesses" to seeing these explosives actually there, why didnt these "eyewitnesses" report this to the media, why didnt they report their findings to higher officials, why is it that NO ONE heard anything about this? seems really fishy to me, almost like it was made up.
http://www.americanfreepress.net/911ad/911supad.html haha i think your so called expert site here is more interested in making a profit than telling the real story. sounds like they are gonna make up any garbage necessary to sell their material2/19/2004 3:08:07 PM |
1337 b4k4 All American 10033 Posts user info edit post |
what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?
HOW DO YOU KNOW YOUR MASS MEDIA SOURCES ARE TELLING THE TRUTH?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't teh j00s part of the great conspiracy sal? What are you doing using them as sources?
Answer the questions. ANSWER THE GOD DAMNED FUCKING QUESTIONS
what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?
HOW DO YOU KNOW YOUR MASS MEDIA SOURCES ARE TELLING THE TRUTH?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't teh j00s part of the great conspiracy sal? What are you doing using them as sources?
Answer the questions. ANSWER THE GOD DAMNED FUCKING QUESTIONS
what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?
HOW DO YOU KNOW YOUR MASS MEDIA SOURCES ARE TELLING THE TRUTH?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't teh j00s part of the great conspiracy sal? What are you doing using them as sources?
Answer the questions. ANSWER THE GOD DAMNED FUCKING QUESTIONS
what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?
HOW DO YOU KNOW YOUR MASS MEDIA SOURCES ARE TELLING THE TRUTH?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't teh j00s part of the great conspiracy sal? What are you doing using them as sources?
Answer the questions. ANSWER THE GOD DAMNED FUCKING QUESTIONS
what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?
HOW DO YOU KNOW YOUR MASS MEDIA SOURCES ARE TELLING THE TRUTH?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't teh j00s part of the great conspiracy sal? What are you doing using them as sources?
Answer the questions. ANSWER THE GOD DAMNED FUCKING QUESTIONS
what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?
HOW DO YOU KNOW YOUR MASS MEDIA SOURCES ARE TELLING THE TRUTH?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't teh j00s part of the great conspiracy sal? What are you doing using them as sources?
Answer the questions. ANSWER THE GOD DAMNED FUCKING QUESTIONS
what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?
HOW DO YOU KNOW YOUR MASS MEDIA SOURCES ARE TELLING THE TRUTH?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't teh j00s part of the great conspiracy sal? What are you doing using them as sources?
Answer the questions. ANSWER THE GOD DAMNED FUCKING QUESTIONS
what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?
HOW DO YOU KNOW YOUR MASS MEDIA SOURCES ARE TELLING THE TRUTH?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't teh j00s part of the great conspiracy sal? What are you doing using them as sources?
Answer the questions. ANSWER THE GOD DAMNED FUCKING QUESTIONS
2/19/2004 6:03:14 PM |
msb2ncsu All American 14033 Posts user info edit post |
breathe. 2/19/2004 6:25:03 PM |
ssjamind All American 30102 Posts user info edit post |
2/20/2004 12:23:07 AM |
methos All American 560 Posts user info edit post |
This thread never fails to make me laugh. 2/20/2004 9:54:36 AM |
CDeezntz All American 6845 Posts user info edit post |
WTF DOES THAT VIDEO SHOW?????????????????? 2/20/2004 9:57:07 AM |
underPSI tillerman 14085 Posts user info edit post |
^^yeah, really. funny how the firefighters from FDNY that survived this ordeal that i have spoken to told me how real this event was and fail to see the humor that people actually believe this was a staged event. but, some people are just hopeless.
[Edited on February 20, 2004 at 9:59 AM. Reason : -] 2/20/2004 9:59:30 AM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
^ Have I said in this thread that the twin towers weren't really attacked or that they didn't really collapse? No, I haven't. The attacks on the WTC and Pentagon really occured. What I am contesting is the validity of the official story...ie, how the attacks happened and who is really responsible.
I don't know about the "FDNY firefighters you talked to", but I have read numerous accounts of FDNY firefighters saying that they believe bombs were in the WTC and saying they heard bombs going off in the buildings. Many of the firefighters are very unsatisfied with the way the "investigation" of the collapse of the WTC buildings was handled. A lot of firefighters are afraid to speak out now because there has been a gag order over the FDNY ranks to silence those who question the official story or are unhappy with the lack of a real investigation.
[Edited on February 20, 2004 at 10:43 AM. Reason : ..] 2/20/2004 10:40:07 AM |
underPSI tillerman 14085 Posts user info edit post |
^yeah, good coverup. but, like i said, the ones i have personally talked to, never mentioned anything about a bomb, or a gov't conspiracy, or any bullshit like that. or maybe its because the gov't threatened their life if they talked.
i just find it really pathetic that a tragedy like this occurs and their are people out their who want to turn it against the US when they should be joining together. it truly amazes me that i actually have the love in risking my own life to help people like yourself, but i was put on this Earth to do that, so i will continue. consider yourself lucky.
[Edited on February 20, 2004 at 10:58 AM. Reason : -] 2/20/2004 10:55:11 AM |
msb2ncsu All American 14033 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "saying that they believe bombs were in the WTC and saying they heard bombs going off in the buildings." |
I think you are extrapolating information that really isn't there. Like saying that bombs we heard because someone says "It was loud, sounded like bobms were going off" does not mean they are saying they think it was actually bombs going off. They are comparing it to something they most closely identify with because luckily most of us don't have the experience of witnessing monsterous skyscrapers collpase and therefore can't appreciate the audio and visuals it produces.2/20/2004 10:56:33 AM |
1337 b4k4 All American 10033 Posts user info edit post |
^^^ You've read accounts, but some of us lived in NY. I think we've got better access to primary sources than you.
[Edited on February 20, 2004 at 10:57 AM. Reason : damn it] 2/20/2004 10:56:50 AM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
People Magazine article:
Quote : | "Louie Cacchioli, 51, is a firefighter assigned to Engine 47 in Harlem.
We were the first ones in the second tower after the plane struck. I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th floor to get in position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up a bomb went off. We think there was bombs set in the building. I had just asked another firefighter to stay with me, which was a good thing because we were trapped inside the elevator and he had the tools to get out.
http://propagandamatrix.com/louie_cacchioli.htm " |
[Edited on February 20, 2004 at 11:11 AM. Reason : ..]2/20/2004 11:10:11 AM |
underPSI tillerman 14085 Posts user info edit post |
ok, ill tell you what ill do. i go to work tomorrow and ill call a buddy at FDNY and ill give him a link to this thread and ill see what he says. now this is a direct source so their can't be much argument from what he says. deal? 2/20/2004 11:13:18 AM |
msb2ncsu All American 14033 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "On the last trip up a bomb went off. We think there was bombs set in the building." |
So a single person hears a loud bang and experiences shaking (as a a building is in the process of collapsing no less) and thinks it could have been a bomb so that means there's a conspiracy? I mean come on man. There are thousands of people who see lights in the sky do funny things and therefore think we are being invaded by aliens. People make assumptions all the time and when the person is not in a position to qualify such a thoguht it isn't to be taken with much merit.
[Edited on February 20, 2004 at 11:18 AM. Reason : .]2/20/2004 11:17:17 AM |
CDeezntz All American 6845 Posts user info edit post |
theres alot of explosive stuff in buildings. 2/20/2004 11:27:59 AM |
brianj320 All American 9166 Posts user info edit post |
^ very detailed comment..lol 2/20/2004 12:58:21 PM |
goalielax All American 11252 Posts user info edit post |
HAHAHA...you are such a simpleton...you think that is two towers in the picture? The impact explosion areas were not on the same floors for the two towers, as it clearly is evident in the craptastic animation you have. What you think is a dividing line between two towers is actually the corner of one building. You are looking at two sides of one tower there, not two towers. Just look at the smoke coming from behind the tower (black and to the right), it is coming from near ground level, no where close to where the aircraft hit. that is clearly film of the second tower collapsing...you would suck at analyizing film and photos... 2/20/2004 3:02:08 PM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
Alex Jones on the Homeland Security police state:
video: http://www.prisonplanet.com/120603homelandsecurity.html
[Edited on February 21, 2004 at 4:07 PM. Reason : ..] 2/21/2004 4:06:38 PM |
1337 b4k4 All American 10033 Posts user info edit post |
what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?
HOW DO YOU KNOW YOUR MASS MEDIA SOURCES ARE TELLING THE TRUTH?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't teh j00s part of the great conspiracy sal? What are you doing using them as sources?
Answer the questions. ANSWER THE GOD DAMNED FUCKING QUESTIONS
what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?
HOW DO YOU KNOW YOUR MASS MEDIA SOURCES ARE TELLING THE TRUTH?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't teh j00s part of the great conspiracy sal? What are you doing using them as sources?
Answer the questions. ANSWER THE GOD DAMNED FUCKING QUESTIONS
what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?
HOW DO YOU KNOW YOUR MASS MEDIA SOURCES ARE TELLING THE TRUTH?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't teh j00s part of the great conspiracy sal? What are you doing using them as sources?
Answer the questions. ANSWER THE GOD DAMNED FUCKING QUESTIONS
what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?
HOW DO YOU KNOW YOUR MASS MEDIA SOURCES ARE TELLING THE TRUTH?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't teh j00s part of the great conspiracy sal? What are you doing using them as sources?
Answer the questions. ANSWER THE GOD DAMNED FUCKING QUESTIONS
what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?
HOW DO YOU KNOW YOUR MASS MEDIA SOURCES ARE TELLING THE TRUTH?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't teh j00s part of the great conspiracy sal? What are you doing using them as sources?
Answer the questions. ANSWER THE GOD DAMNED FUCKING QUESTIONS
what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?
HOW DO YOU KNOW YOUR MASS MEDIA SOURCES ARE TELLING THE TRUTH?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't teh j00s part of the great conspiracy sal? What are you doing using them as sources?
Answer the questions. ANSWER THE GOD DAMNED FUCKING QUESTIONS
what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?
HOW DO YOU KNOW YOUR MASS MEDIA SOURCES ARE TELLING THE TRUTH?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't teh j00s part of the great conspiracy sal? What are you doing using them as sources?
Answer the questions. ANSWER THE GOD DAMNED FUCKING QUESTIONS
what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?
HOW DO YOU KNOW YOUR MASS MEDIA SOURCES ARE TELLING THE TRUTH?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't teh j00s part of the great conspiracy sal? What are you doing using them as sources?
Answer the questions. ANSWER THE GOD DAMNED FUCKING QUESTIONS
2/21/2004 5:32:56 PM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
Alex Jones' video "The Masers of Terror". This video focusses on the U.S. government's engineering of 9/11 and the coming police state in the U.S.
Entire video can be seen here:
------->http://www.prisonplanet.com/120603mastersofterror.html<---------
[Edited on February 21, 2004 at 6:06 PM. Reason : ..]
2/21/2004 5:41:22 PM |
1337 b4k4 All American 10033 Posts user info edit post |
what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?
HOW DO YOU KNOW YOUR MASS MEDIA SOURCES ARE TELLING THE TRUTH?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't teh j00s part of the great conspiracy sal? What are you doing using them as sources?
Answer the questions. ANSWER THE GOD DAMNED FUCKING QUESTIONS
what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?
HOW DO YOU KNOW YOUR MASS MEDIA SOURCES ARE TELLING THE TRUTH?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't teh j00s part of the great conspiracy sal? What are you doing using them as sources?
Answer the questions. ANSWER THE GOD DAMNED FUCKING QUESTIONS
what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?
HOW DO YOU KNOW YOUR MASS MEDIA SOURCES ARE TELLING THE TRUTH?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't teh j00s part of the great conspiracy sal? What are you doing using them as sources?
Answer the questions. ANSWER THE GOD DAMNED FUCKING QUESTIONS
what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?
HOW DO YOU KNOW YOUR MASS MEDIA SOURCES ARE TELLING THE TRUTH?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't teh j00s part of the great conspiracy sal? What are you doing using them as sources?
Answer the questions. ANSWER THE GOD DAMNED FUCKING QUESTIONS
what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?
HOW DO YOU KNOW YOUR MASS MEDIA SOURCES ARE TELLING THE TRUTH?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't teh j00s part of the great conspiracy sal? What are you doing using them as sources?
Answer the questions. ANSWER THE GOD DAMNED FUCKING QUESTIONS
what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?
HOW DO YOU KNOW YOUR MASS MEDIA SOURCES ARE TELLING THE TRUTH?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't teh j00s part of the great conspiracy sal? What are you doing using them as sources?
Answer the questions. ANSWER THE GOD DAMNED FUCKING QUESTIONS
what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?
HOW DO YOU KNOW YOUR MASS MEDIA SOURCES ARE TELLING THE TRUTH?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't teh j00s part of the great conspiracy sal? What are you doing using them as sources?
Answer the questions. ANSWER THE GOD DAMNED FUCKING QUESTIONS
what exactly caused an explosion that reached over 47 stories into the air, which no other media outlet has picked up on, no one remembers and which seems to have not had any damage on anything?
HOW DO YOU KNOW YOUR MASS MEDIA SOURCES ARE TELLING THE TRUTH?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't teh j00s part of the great conspiracy sal? What are you doing using them as sources?
Answer the questions. ANSWER THE GOD DAMNED FUCKING QUESTIONS
2/21/2004 7:08:42 PM |
UberCool All American 3457 Posts user info edit post |
^^ "the masers of terror," eh? some new crime family?
oh snap, i guess that was supposed to be the masters of terror 2/21/2004 7:37:19 PM |
brianj320 All American 9166 Posts user info edit post |
^^^ that "documentary of the truth" must be correct since Alex Jones got his hands on all this top-secret information about the government's involvement, right salis? what puzzles me is if he knows the '"truth" why is he still on his craptacular radio show that gets maybe a dozen or so listeners. why isnt he on major news channels, major news shows giving interviews? this guy doesnt know jack, he is only making assumptions based on what information is in the public eyes.
[Edited on February 21, 2004 at 8:40 PM. Reason : ^] 2/21/2004 8:40:01 PM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
An Archive of videos from http://www.prisonplanet.com:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/video.html 2/21/2004 10:46:02 PM |
underPSI tillerman 14085 Posts user info edit post |
salisburyboy, do you believe everything you read off of the internet?? i talked to an on-duty FDNY firefighter yesterday and he just laughed when i told him about this thread and said to me, "ignorance is more expensive than an education.". yes, this guy was at the WTC scene. he also reminded me that the press is a co. that is in business to make money and reminded me of how many scenes i've been on where the press has showed up and took video footage and when shown on tv, its totally blown way out of proportion and is nothing like what really happened. i guess you just have to be on the inside of the yellow tape to understand how crooked the press is.
salisbury, i'm sorry you're life has turned out to be the way it is. 2/22/2004 9:15:51 AM |
brianj320 All American 9166 Posts user info edit post |
^ the only stuff he reads off the internet is on websites where they distort all the facts so that they apply to his theory. and if he reads something that disproves his theory, then he concludes that it is a false article and that it must be lying, all because it doesnt support his position!
Under, he is a sad and confused individual and unfortunately, his life turned out the way it is. 2/22/2004 2:00:14 PM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "the only stuff he reads off the internet is on websites where they distort all the facts so that they apply to his theory. and if he reads something that disproves his theory, then he concludes that it is a false article and that it must be lying
--brianj320" |
I didn't just decide one day that I wanted the U.S.government to have been complicit in the 9/11 attacks or make a theory up by myself to support that the U.S. government was complicit.
I came to the belief that the U.S. government was complicit in the 9/11 attacks after having looked at the evidence. It is no "theory" that the U.S. government was complicit in the 9/11 attacks...it is a FACT....supported by the evidence.
Quote : | "salisbury, i'm sorry you're life has turned out to be the way it is.
--underPSI" |
Is that supposed to make me feel bad? Nice try...but it's not working.
You can be "sorry" for me all you want. It doesn't affect me one way or the other. I will believe the truth regardless of what you or anyone else says, believes, or does.
[Edited on February 22, 2004 at 3:55 PM. Reason : ..]2/22/2004 3:53:46 PM |
UberCool All American 3457 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "I will believe the truth regardless of what you or anyone else says, believes, or does." |
Which is to say, you'll believe what you perceive to be the truth? So the "truth" that other people believe--even if it too is supported by facts--is in fact false and is just an evil plot to destroy your beliefs. okay...
[Edited on February 22, 2004 at 4:05 PM. Reason : ]2/22/2004 4:03:44 PM |
brianj320 All American 9166 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "I came to the belief that the U.S. government was complicit in the 9/11 attacks after having looked at the evidence. It is no "theory" that the U.S. government was complicit in the 9/11 attacks...it is a FACT....supported by the evidence." |
yea you looked at evidence off of conspiracy related websites such as your all proclaimed Alex Jones' site. he will say anything and do anything to get people behind him so that he can prove to the real world that he is someone, rather than some shit radio host no one has ever heard of. and i like i said, if you looked at evidence that disproved your theory, you would dismiss it as being false and a lie. you would only believe evicence that supported your theory.
and it is not a FACT, as you state, that the government was involved; you THINK and ASSUME based on what biased evidence you have read and seen. in that 1 pic you posted of the 2 towers, 1 of which wasn't supposedly there, i want you to look at it and tell me honestly if you see 2 towers there or if you've been blinded by all your conspiracy bull. i think if anyone has been brainwashed it is you.
[Edited on February 22, 2004 at 4:25 PM. Reason : clarification]2/22/2004 4:13:31 PM |
CDeezntz All American 6845 Posts user info edit post |
the towers arnt suppost to be there in the video? what
it says earlier on the damn video. 2/22/2004 4:23:52 PM |
Mr Roboto All American 809 Posts user info edit post |
anyone who reads what salisbury has been saying holds the same opinion. that video obviously shows ONE building. Bush is on video sitting in a classroom when the first plane hit, he simply misspoke. your conspiracy theories are a waste of my time and make me angry. show some intelligence and give up on this crack pot theory. your worse than micheal moore 2/22/2004 4:33:58 PM |