^^ Don't forget about the 3rd emerging group, those that wish they hadn't just wasted a minute reading your post.

8/30/2011 1:43:37 PM

^ meta post.

8/30/2011 1:47:00 PM

Sorry I was bored at work. That was mean.

8/30/2011 1:48:34 PM

Quote :

"Any game is good when you're drunk"

But it's even more fun when you are getting drunk with a bunch of slutty sorority girls, rather than a bunch of troll looking Snookies.

Quote :

"the battlefield/chess match that occurs when 11 guys in full body armor line up in formation on the grass/turf. ... i'm going to stop myself there - i almost started making ridiculous and probaly unreasltic predictions on why Marine Officer Tom O'Brien is going to make us thee dominant football program in our league."

This got me really excited for this weekend.

8/30/2011 1:55:00 PM

There's one thing worse than sorostitutes with money.

Sorostitutes that THINK they have money, but only have it by Mississippi standards.

Ole Miss is UVa if it had no actual prestige.

And the hottest student bodies are both in the same city: USC and UCLA.

8/30/2011 3:07:30 PM

UCLA is a bunch of Asians. What if you aren't into Asians? (I am, just saying it kind of limits the diversity)

8/30/2011 4:11:01 PM

Big4Monkey

8/30/2011 4:13:47 PM

I dunno, I hear Arizona State has some of the best lookers in the country.

8/30/2011 4:17:41 PM

And some of the dumbest too.

8/30/2011 4:21:55 PM

Quote :

"UCLA is a bunch of Asians. What if you aren't into Asians? (I am, just saying it kind of limits the diversity)"

I hear Los Angeles has a lot of Latinos, whites, and blacks.

8/30/2011 4:27:09 PM

I had always heard the largest colleges in states which don't have that many colleges were best for the hotties. So, some place like Arizona would probably fit that bill. I guess the idea is that most of the lookers in the entire state end up going to the same big school.

State has a lot of them though. I'm sure there are better but sitting in the student section at Carter-Finley is extremely distracting. I mean, why would they put a football game in a place with such gorgeous girls anyway? Stupid idea.

8/30/2011 4:59:33 PM

I'll just leave this here

8/30/2011 5:13:50 PM

^Cheerleader effect.

Though, FSU does indeed have some beautiful ladies.

8/30/2011 5:15:48 PM

Honestly, and I know I'll be called a fag for saying this, but there's something off about that foursome. Yes, their bodies are like 8-9/10 but only one of them is decently attractive in the face...

I've actually seen better at our games, they just don't dress quite like that, lol.

[Edited on August 30, 2011 at 5:26 PM. Reason : .]

8/30/2011 5:25:07 PM

Fag

Second from the left is the only one you hesitate with

8/30/2011 5:26:52 PM

Maybe it's the fake blonde look. The one on the far left is the only one I find very attractive.

However, it's like my former roommate used to say: "If she grabbed you in the crotch..." Yeah, I wouldn't say no to any of them in that situation. What standards?

8/30/2011 5:29:57 PM

Jenn Sterger is a bit too inflated.

8/30/2011 5:35:24 PM

Fag

8/30/2011 5:36:05 PM

I agree with jsausley. They're just not really attractive to me.

8/30/2011 5:38:05 PM

Asians > Rednecks

8/30/2011 5:38:51 PM

I wish I could be picky

8/30/2011 5:53:58 PM

Quote :

"Asians > Rednecks"

Lies

8/30/2011 5:57:15 PM

bunch of fags on page 15

8/30/2011 5:59:23 PM

Asians are only attractive if you like tiny munchkin alien looking women. Strictly my political incorrect opinion.

8/30/2011 6:00:49 PM

A lot of these girls aren't full-blooded Asian.

It's not like it's Beijing.

And I'd rather have that than some willfully ignorant rednecks from chucklefuck, ms.

8/31/2011 9:35:29 AM

I still think conferences larger than 12 teams are stupid as hell, Big East basketball tournament anyone?

Quote :

"Texas A&M has notified the Big 12 that it plans to apply for membership to a new conference, and if accepted, it will end its membership with the Big 12 on June 30, 2012."

Could still get rejected for multiple reasons.

8/31/2011 12:22:07 PM

Quote :

"I wish I could be picky"

8/31/2011 1:49:56 PM

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/828345-sec-expansion-being-mike-slive

8/31/2011 2:03:16 PM

pat forde on scott van pelt yesterday said look out for us to join the SEC.

LOL. pat forde, stirring the pot.

9/1/2011 11:45:03 AM

http://outkickthecoverage.com/mission-impossible-texas-ams-2012-sec-schedule.php

this guy says state would run to the SEC if the opportunity presented itself

9/1/2011 11:47:12 AM

i don't doubt that we would.

9/1/2011 11:59:16 AM

id like to, but compared to the agendas of other people, mine is a lot different

9/1/2011 12:01:00 PM

what is yours?

i just want them dollars.

9/1/2011 12:01:52 PM

My agenda:

- 8-team ACC consisting of NC State, UNC, Duke, Wake, UVa, Clemson, Maryland, and Virginia Tech (instead of USC).
- Who cares about the SEC? They can have FSU or Georgia Tech.
- ACC Tournament runs Fri-Sat the first weekend of March each year, alternating between Greensboro and Charlotte.
- Who cares about the football championship game?
- Basketball moves back to a renovated Reynolds.

I'd seriously give up our automatic BCS bid and move to the same level of consideration at the Mountain West in BCS terms in order to get all of this.

9/1/2011 12:22:37 PM

If we're putting up pipe dreams that'll never happen, here's mine:

-Eliminate all Division I-A conferences for football.
-Group all Division I-A teams into 4 "regions", i.e. megaconferences, based entirely on geography. If you're in this certain state, you're in this certain region and it's solely based on geography. No exceptions.
-The 4 regions will be North, South, Midwest, and West. Regions will have roughly 30 teams each.
-Divide each region equally into 3 divisions. All 12 divisions will play a full round robin inside themselves.
-The 3 divisions inside each region play like a European soccer pyramid. The top division in each region is the only one that can contend for the national championship. The winner of the top division in each region goes to a Football Final 4 to determine the national champion. No at-large bids, you only can compete for the national championship if you win your region's title.
-The winner of the 2nd division one year will replace the worst team from the top division inside the same region the following year. The winner of the 3rd division will replace the worst team from the 2nd division the following year.
-This setup does respect rivalries. Every team will have around 9 division games. That leaves them 3 games to play whoever they want. However, the sole determining factor for a team getting promoted or going to the national championship is division record.

[Edited on September 1, 2011 at 12:31 PM. Reason : .]

9/1/2011 12:31:10 PM

the year round college football season.

9/1/2011 12:55:05 PM

^^So, if the Beers beat Detroit and Denver beats Atlanta in the American Southwestern Division East Northern, then Milwaukee goes to the Denslow Cup, unless Baltimore can upset Buffalo and Charlotte ties Toronto, then Oakland would play LA and Pittsburgh in a blind choice round robin. And if no clear winner emerges from all of this, the two-man sack race will be held on consecutive Sundays until a champion can be crowned.

9/1/2011 1:01:59 PM

Quote :

"^^So, if the Beers beat Detroit and Denver beats Atlanta in the American Southwestern Division East Northern, then Milwaukee goes to the Denslow Cup, unless Baltimore can upset Buffalo and Charlotte ties Toronto, then Oakland would play LA and Pittsburgh in a blind choice round robin. And if no clear winner emerges from all of this, the two-man sack race will be held on consecutive Sundays until a champion can be crowned."

South Division I: top 10 schools in Southern states, winner is champion of the Southern region and goes into a final four to see who becomes national title game, 10th place plays in South Division II the next year; all the other teams that aren't regional champions postseason can do what they do now: play in meaningless NIT-style bowl games

South Division II: teams 11 thru 20 in Southern states, winner moves up to South Division I next year, 10th moves down to South Division III next year

South Division III: worst I-A teams in the region, winner moves up to South Division II

All results and moves based on conference records. Complete round robin. You have 30 teams plus or minus a couple per region

No politics. No polls. No five-hour discussions from hacks on talk radio and ESPN on whether Team X is worthy of being in the title game. Everything is based entirely on actual on-the-field results unlike now and 40 teams start every season with an equal chance at winning the national championship, which is more than exists now in my opinion because I don't buy for a second that if N.C. State or any other BCS school at our level went undefeated throughout a season that they'd get into the national title game.

[Edited on September 1, 2011 at 1:30 PM. Reason : /]

9/1/2011 1:27:15 PM

you're really wasting your time typing this out, b/c this is the most absurd fucking alternate plan i've read.

9/1/2011 1:30:01 PM

yeah, im not interested in reading any of it

9/1/2011 1:31:01 PM

^ I know it has no chance at happening, but compared to the bullshit system now?

9/1/2011 1:31:20 PM

^It was a "Jump to Conclusions" mat. You see, it would be this mat that you would put on the floor... and would have different CONCLUSIONS written on it that you could JUMP TO.

9/1/2011 1:55:13 PM

^lol

9/1/2011 1:57:16 PM

bring it back

9/1/2011 2:16:57 PM

Oklahoma considering leaving Big XII now

9/2/2011 11:23:42 PM

Translation: SEC is trying to take Texas A&M and Oklahoma (where the heck else would Oklahoma go?)

9/3/2011 8:43:48 AM

Pac-however many

9/3/2011 8:48:13 AM

why would the big12 die instead of just pulling in byu, boise, houston and nevada? Boise is good enough in football to hold carry their weight and the rest of those teams are goodb at basketball as well. BYU is a hell of a school and all three of those schools should be looking to leave conferences after TCU left them as a weak conference.

9/3/2011 8:49:17 AM

I don't see the Oklahoma legislature (and T Boone Pickens) allowing OU to leave without taking OSU (like the UVA-VT situation).

9/3/2011 10:48:52 AM

Quote :

"why would the big12 die instead of just pulling in byu, boise, houston and nevada?"

The University of Texas and their outrageous TV deal with ESPN. It's part of the reason why A&M is leaving and the conference is folding in general.

9/3/2011 10:52:52 AM