User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » Scott Wood Appreciation Thread Page 1 ... 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19, Prev Next  
ohmy
All American
3875 Posts
user info
edit post

bttt

2/23/2013 5:17:53 PM

ncstatetke
All American
41128 Posts
user info
edit post

Attn: Pony

I'm sorry for being a hater. If you're only going to have one trick, make sure it's a good trick

2/23/2013 5:18:07 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148436 Posts
user info
edit post

2/23/2013 5:18:44 PM

ncstatetke
All American
41128 Posts
user info
edit post

ouch

2/23/2013 5:35:58 PM

aaronburro
Sup, B
53062 Posts
user info
edit post

thanks for trying, scott. can't overcome stupid coaching and stupid prima donna players that can't hold onto the ball

2/23/2013 5:44:23 PM

sand robot
Sand Lion
2227 Posts
user info
edit post

The D where you let the guy blow by you and try to block him from behind needs to fucking go

[Edited on February 23, 2013 at 5:44 PM. Reason : A good offensive effort today]

2/23/2013 5:44:32 PM

face
All American
8503 Posts
user info
edit post

yep heroic effort from Wood today, unfortunately he's the only one who showed up.

At least he can go out knowing he had 2 good games against Carolina in his career.

2/23/2013 5:45:56 PM

sand robot
Sand Lion
2227 Posts
user info
edit post

Howell

2/23/2013 5:50:21 PM

FatTony
All American
1769 Posts
user info
edit post

1. Reddick (Dk) 457
2. Staples, Virginia 413
3. Scott, GT 351
4. Langdon (Dk) 342
5. Childress, WF 329
6. Monroe (NCSU) 322
7. Grey WF 319
8. Williams (Dk) 313
9. Wood 307

2/23/2013 6:10:50 PM

skokiaan
All American
26447 Posts
user info
edit post

Crazy how efficient he is. Some of his shots recently have been Redick-esque -- running at a full sprint out to the 3 point line, turning and shooting with a guy in his face.

If Wood could run off screens like that every play, our best offense would be to just let him shoot every time.

[Edited on February 24, 2013 at 12:41 PM. Reason : .]

2/24/2013 12:23:28 PM

Maverick1024
All American
4866 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"our best offense would be to just let him shoot every time"


I've had the same thought. Let Scott shoot, let Howell/Warren/Leslie fight for the offensive rebound = maximum offense.


[Edited on February 24, 2013 at 1:13 PM. Reason : Never gonna happen, but it's a nice thought.]

2/24/2013 1:13:04 PM

jbrick83
All American
23447 Posts
user info
edit post

Hope he can keep this up through the tournies. Nice to see him finishing his career at State on a high note.

Hope we don't waste having one of the best three point shooters and best rebounders in our program's history on the same team.

2/24/2013 2:49:07 PM

face
All American
8503 Posts
user info
edit post

Wood now has the 7th highest Offensive Rating in the country at a ludicrous 129.2


Now, I'll be the first to say offensive rating is a bit skewed and tends to favor low usage guys who don't handle the ball a lot. But Scott Wood isn't the only player in the country who plays such a role.

His Total Shooting % is up to 65.3% which is good for 16th in the country. He's raised his defensive rebound rate to 8.3% this year which isn't TERRIBLE for a SF especially when you consider how few rebounds Howell even leaves available for teammates this year lol.

His block rate is a very respectable 2.3% which means almost every 40 shots that goes up one of them is getting sent back by Scottie. His turnover rate of 12% is the 112th lowest in the country, though that is mitigated by the fact that he's an ineffective passer/creator, so I won't give him a ton of praise for that.

The guy has gotten a lot of criticism over the years, some of which was deserved as he did tend to no-show in some big games and his defense has been spotty at times. On the other hand he's hit quite a few huge shots this year and his FT accuracy at the end of games has sealed several wins for us.

Overall I think he's been underappreciated as a four year starter. His three point numbers speak for themselves and he certainly has helped us space the court. I think if we'd had more depth over the years and he'd played a few less minutes his shooting percentages would be even higher.

Hopefully he closes his career out on a hot streak and doesn't pull a "Duke" where their best shooters always go cold in March Madness their senior year for some reason (see: Trajan Langdon, JJ Redick, and several others)

2/24/2013 3:00:41 PM

tower
All American
12280 Posts
user info
edit post

We really need him to shoot more. For all the bullshit about inefficient "shot creaters" (Leslie) opening up the offense...Wood does that way more. Howell and Warren would get a ton of free lay ups from cuts running an offense designed around Wood.

2/24/2013 3:08:49 PM

face
All American
8503 Posts
user info
edit post

yeah a perfect example is the play where Wood was running in/out of Howell's screens where UNC was 100% focused on not letting him get an open look. Howell simply drifted to the basket and no one went with him for an easy layup. That was just beautiful execution and recognition by both Howell and whoever passed it (think it was Brown)

2/24/2013 3:27:07 PM

Bullet
All American
28404 Posts
user info
edit post

Wood never makes big shots in big games, and should be coming off the bench only when TJ needs a break. He shouldn't average more than 18 mins a game.

2/25/2013 11:07:50 AM

GingaNinja
All American
7177 Posts
user info
edit post

^^

Not related to Wood, but earlier in the game, when Calvin dished out a beautiful pass to Howell in the paint, I knew we were going to win

[Edited on February 25, 2013 at 11:17 AM. Reason : ...]

2/25/2013 11:16:57 AM

alfredough
All American
1121 Posts
user info
edit post

Going to miss him next year

2/27/2013 8:51:02 PM

natureboy
All American
2803 Posts
user info
edit post

Me too, not sure if anyone will shoot above 30% from three for us without him on the roster.

2/27/2013 8:56:50 PM

AndyMac
All American
31922 Posts
user info
edit post

Purvis

2/27/2013 8:58:13 PM

FatTony
All American
1769 Posts
user info
edit post

1. Reddick (Dk) 457
2. Staples, Virginia 413
3. Scott, GT 351
4. Langdon (Dk) 342
5. Childress, WF 329
6. Monroe (NCSU) 322
7. Grey WF 319
8. Williams (Dk) 313
9. Wood 312

2/27/2013 10:00:38 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148436 Posts
user info
edit post

2/27/2013 10:34:37 PM

mnfares
All American
1838 Posts
user info
edit post

^haha, awesome pic

2/27/2013 10:38:01 PM

ncsuapex
SpaceForRent
37776 Posts
user info
edit post

^^ give me that ball fool. I got 3s to make.

2/27/2013 10:39:50 PM

GingaNinja
All American
7177 Posts
user info
edit post

http://www.news-record.com/blogs/sportsextra/819188-87/the-scott-wood-doctrine-an

Quote :
"Everyone knows that Erick Green is the most prolific scorer in the ACC.

Shoot, the Virginia Tech guard leads the nation at 25.2 points per game and could become the first ACC player to win a national scoring title since South Carolina’s Grady Wallace in 1957.

But is he the league’s most efficient scorer?

Nope. Scott Wood’s got him beaten there. So do about 15 other ACC players.

There are a bunch of ways to measure offensive efficiency, but a fairly simple one is just dividing the number of points a player has scored by the number of shots he has taken, both field goal and free throw.
CONTINUE READING

That method benefits the guys who make a lot of 3-pointers (since they get a whole extra point on those) and free throws (since a guy shooting 90 percent can rack up efficiency points on a guy shooting 60 over time), but doesn’t it make sense that the best shooters would be the most efficient scorers?

Anyway, here are the top 30 scorers in the ACC (going by points per game) rearranged by points per shot:

Click here to follow us on Twitter.

Scott Wood, NCSU — 1.16

Reggie Bullock, UNC — 1.13

T.J. Warren, NCSU — 1.13

Joe Harris, UVA — 1.09

Seth Curry, DUKE — 1.07

Shane Larkin, MIA — 1.07

C.J. Harris, WF — 1.02

Okaro White, FSU — 0.997

P.J. Hairston, UNC — 0.997

Kenny Kadji, MIA — 0.994

Richard Howell, NCSU — 0.992

Quinn Cook, DUKE — 0.991

Dez Wells, UMD — 0.988

Rasheed Sulaimon, DUKE — 0.983

Erick Green, VT — 0.978

Mason Plumlee, DUKE — 0.966

Michael Snaer, FSU — 0.958

Alex Len, UMD — 0.958

Akil Mitchell, UVA — 0.955

Devin Booker, CLEM — 0.941

Durand Scott, MIA — 0.937

Travis McKie, WF — 0.934

Jarell Eddie, VT — 0.916

Olivier Hanlan, BC — 0.906

C.J. Leslie, NCSU — 0.904

K.J. McDaniels, CLEM — 0.903

Marcus Georges-Hunt, GT — 0.891

Lorenzo Brown, NCSU — 0.879

Ryan Anderson, BC — 0.862

James Michael McAdoo, UNC — 0.796

Reflections

— Wood has 346 points on only 299 shots. His career ratio coming into the year was 1.08. He doesn’t create his own shot off the dribble often and he has to run through mazes of screens to get free, but when he gets his shot, he cashes in. Warren is an interesting case as well, having shot only 8.4 times a game this year. If he were to get more shots, would the ratio hold?

— So...Bullock should probably shoot the ball more too, right Tar Heel fans? And maybe McAdoo should be a bit more choosy?

— You can see a pretty clear divide between perimeter types and post types on the list. Howell appears to be the most efficient post scorer, and that should help his first-team All-ACC bona fides. And it’s not just putbacks this year. He’s got himself a little jumper, too.

— Joe Harris is having a great year. Why don’t you throw him on the first team, too?

— With all the talk of Ryan Kelly possibly coming back next week, now seems like a good time to let you know he was averaging 1.03 points per shot before the injury. His two replacements — Amile Jefferson (0.925) and Josh Hairston (0.862) — have left a little lacking.

— This is by no means a be-all, end-all offensive measure. I’m not saying, for instance, that Akil Mitchell is a better offensive weapon than Lorenzo Brown. But give each of them 10 shot attempts in a game — at least this season — and Mitchell will score you 0.76 more points than Brown. Just some food for thought ..."

3/1/2013 1:56:23 PM

BanjoMan
All American
9609 Posts
user info
edit post

So is it pretty much written in stone that Wood has no chance of getting drafted?

3/1/2013 2:23:17 PM

Doss2k
All American
18474 Posts
user info
edit post

I wouldnt imagine so, just too limited in his game. He may make a team that has a roster spot free for a role player. The thing Wood does is makes one defender have to chase him around the whole game freeing up space for the other guys which could be more valuable in the NBA where a lot of ISO is run. Just my hunch at least

[Edited on March 1, 2013 at 3:02 PM. Reason : .]

3/1/2013 3:02:09 PM

BridgetSPK
#1 Sir Purr Fan
31378 Posts
user info
edit post

At this time, I think it's important to note that Scott Wood is easily the best looking guy in the ACC.

Very handsome and only getting handsomer. He should go pro for this reason alone.

3/1/2013 3:10:11 PM

aimorris
All American
15213 Posts
user info
edit post

Very important. Thanks for noting.

3/1/2013 3:24:47 PM

BridgetSPK
#1 Sir Purr Fan
31378 Posts
user info
edit post

Any time.

3/1/2013 3:29:41 PM

timbo
All American
1003 Posts
user info
edit post

I still don't understand all the hype around Erick Green. The guy takes half the shots for VT. Of course he's going to score 25+ per game. Hell, any one of our guys could average 20+ if they took 17 FGA and 5 3PA per game.

3/1/2013 3:39:54 PM

Bullet
All American
28404 Posts
user info
edit post

^he's 8th in the ACC in FG%. The 7 in front of him are mostly bigger men. So not only does he shoot a lot, he makes a high percentage. (CJL and Howell are 5th and 6th)

[Edited on March 1, 2013 at 4:35 PM. Reason : ]

3/1/2013 4:21:25 PM

Maverick1024
All American
4866 Posts
user info
edit post

^^Have you watched VT play? He takes half the shots because he has to -- he's the only one on the team who can create any type of offense.

3/1/2013 4:39:12 PM

simonn
best gottfriend
28968 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"At this time, I think it's important to note that Scott Wood is easily the best looking guy in the ACC."

man that's some racist shit.

3/1/2013 5:49:49 PM

BanjoMan
All American
9609 Posts
user info
edit post

Well, he's not; he's not even the top 2 on the team. I understand bias here because everybody has a man crush on him, but if you had to poll people who's job it is to judge cuteness and what not, I guarantee that Purvis would win that competition by a large margin.

3/1/2013 6:30:17 PM

Bullet
All American
28404 Posts
user info
edit post

This kind of talk in ST should at least be reserved to the offseason.

3/1/2013 7:00:54 PM

ncsuapex
SpaceForRent
37776 Posts
user info
edit post

They went back in time to Indiana circa 1950 and recruited Scott Wood

3/1/2013 7:39:45 PM

The E Man
Suspended
15268 Posts
user info
edit post

All this time I thought LOBO was the cutest on the team and purv was funny looking. In the ACC tho.

JMM has to be the best

[Edited on March 1, 2013 at 7:47 PM. Reason : If leslie passed to him, wood would score 25ppg]

3/1/2013 7:46:31 PM

BridgetSPK
#1 Sir Purr Fan
31378 Posts
user info
edit post

This is one of the few times since integration that the honor of ACC Hottie of the Year has gone to a white guy. Just let it happen, guys.

3/2/2013 12:36:26 AM

BanjoMan
All American
9609 Posts
user info
edit post

What are you crazy? Ilian Evtimov was in contention for that crown every year he was here. Hell even ol JJ wasn't too bad if you pass on the haterade. Competition is way to stiff though for wood this year with Larkin, JMM and Purvis all lookin good.

[Edited on March 2, 2013 at 12:40 AM. Reason : s]

3/2/2013 12:39:29 AM

WolfpckGrl17
All American
5755 Posts
user info
edit post

Since we are talking about looks......Richard Howell >>>>>> Scott Wood > Lorenzo Brown >>> Rodney Purvis.



^ Engin Atsur was better than Ilian Evtimov. And who can forget Tony Bethel??



[Edited on March 2, 2013 at 12:47 AM. Reason : RH's smile.....]

3/2/2013 12:39:44 AM

BanjoMan
All American
9609 Posts
user info
edit post

Yeah I forgot about RH, cuz I still picture him as the fat ass that he used to be.

[Edited on March 2, 2013 at 12:41 AM. Reason : s]

3/2/2013 12:41:22 AM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148436 Posts
user info
edit post

Purvis is handsome because he likes to smile

But he's not Harrow

~

3/2/2013 12:46:59 AM

WolfpckGrl17
All American
5755 Posts
user info
edit post

^^ I know RH got more lean and ripped, but I don't recall him being "fat". Pics or it didn't happen.

3/2/2013 12:49:35 AM

BridgetSPK
#1 Sir Purr Fan
31378 Posts
user info
edit post

AHA, I did not anticipate all this input. You all make some good points.

3/2/2013 1:22:18 AM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148436 Posts
user info
edit post

Bridget has this picture blown up to poster size on her ceiling

3/2/2013 1:27:37 AM

BridgetSPK
#1 Sir Purr Fan
31378 Posts
user info
edit post

LOL That picture is actually so sweet that it's making me uncomfortable.

I think they're about to hug.

3/2/2013 1:49:28 AM

WolfpckGrl17
All American
5755 Posts
user info
edit post

^ Haha! I think this one is just as sweet:



It's like he's posing.

[Edited on March 2, 2013 at 3:07 AM. Reason : .]

3/2/2013 3:01:38 AM

simonn
best gottfriend
28968 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"If leslie passed to him, wood would score 25ppg"

LOL

3/2/2013 5:47:40 AM

face
All American
8503 Posts
user info
edit post

can't be serious about Erick Green.

His stats are ridiculous.

The guy takes 33% of VT's shots and still manages an incredible 58.9 TS% and 120 o-rating.

D-Reb is 10.8% which is nearly double a lot of PG's. Ast rate is 29.8 and TO is a ridiculously low 10.6% (48th in the nation which is incredible for a PG).

I'd have to agree he deserves POY. With Plumlee and Howell in contention.

3/2/2013 7:48:59 AM

 Message Boards » Sports Talk » Scott Wood Appreciation Thread Page 1 ... 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19, Prev Next  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.39 - our disclaimer.