liking Duke -14 tonight .. I'm sure Coach K's been scheming all week to shut down the one trick pony, plus its at Duke.

1/7/2009 5:41:44 PM

damn, Duke has a ~6 min scoring drought and Davidson covers by 2. Typical.

Liking the over 70 in tonights football game, Florida and Oklahomasexuals are scoring machines.

1/8/2009 6:38:11 PM

Fl -5

1/8/2009 8:04:45 PM

took the under and OK +6


That under is looking mighty fine

1/8/2009 9:58:36 PM

damn 0-2 on my picks, trying Ravens +3 with a new center starting only his 2nd career NFL game for the Tits.

1/10/2009 11:57:17 AM

His name is Leroy Harris, lol

I also like BAL +3 but Leroy is awesome

1/10/2009 2:33:39 PM

Thanks Ben for missing that last free throw. NC State +11.5

1/10/2009 3:47:23 PM

Yeah, it was a rough start to the day. I took:

NCSU +11.5 (lost by 12)
Maryland -8 (won by 7)
Tennessee -9 (won by 9 because Georgia hit a pointless 3 with 8 seconds left in the game)

1/10/2009 5:30:41 PM

Yeah its been all around complete rough times lately on centsports. I reached a high of like 780$, then completely tumbled down to 100$. It has been an awful few weeks. Today has been my first winning day in like two weeks literally. Hit Ravens ML and the under thankfully so far. Have Car -10 and the under later, along with some bball going in the meantime.

1/10/2009 7:53:10 PM

yay

took bal +1 at halftime and under 17.5 points at halftime

also bal moneyline and under 34.5.

2-0 today

holla

1/10/2009 8:40:34 PM

I bet Cal +5, but I'm not sure if that game is ever going to end.

1/10/2009 8:52:07 PM

What a day. I take the Ravens straight up and they win and then I took the Cards straight up and parlayed it with the over. Way to lay a big egg panthers, now get the fuck off my tv every weekend and let me watch some real football. Suck it panther fans.

1/10/2009 9:40:45 PM

Cards SU parlayed with over would give a pretty crazy return. What's that like +800 or something?

1/10/2009 10:02:31 PM

blah

well at least my parlay is still alive, took the under...

1/10/2009 11:18:53 PM

I won $200 on Fla St. +4 tonight. I almost took the money line, but I was like "Nah, State's got a chance to pull out a win."

1/13/2009 10:59:47 PM

COME ON HAWKS.

1/13/2009 11:28:51 PM

THX HAWKS

3 Team Parlay

(505) Miami Heat -2 (-105) Tue@8:05p


(507) Los Angeles Lakers -4 Tue@8:35p

(509) Atlanta Hawks +7 Tue@9:05p

1/13/2009 11:32:45 PM

FYI for this weekends games:

Parlay:
Cards straight up
Ravens straight up
Ravens/Steelers U37 (bought 3)
Cards/Eagles O44 (bought 3)
$5 bet is paying $100

1/14/2009 1:17:46 PM

I had Florida at -3 and they were up 67-59 with 11 seconds left so I started checking up on my other bets. Of course I look back a few minutes later and see Florida won 68-65...

1/14/2009 10:04:24 PM

yeah that FLA -3 fucked me too

1/14/2009 10:09:52 PM

GOD DAMMIT

took Xavier -2...

shooting two free throws with 4 seconds to go.

misses both.

game over.

67-65.

1/16/2009 1:28:55 AM

I'm seriously confused right now. I thought I knew how this worked, but apparently I don't. just started betting like a week ago.

but WHY DID I WIN THIS?

Quote :

" Date placed: Jan 15, 2009 4:49p Date settled: Jan 15, 2009 11:38p 3 Team Parlay Basketball - College Lines (Game) Point Spread (521) Xavier -2 (-105) Thu@8:00p Final Scores Xavier 67 Rhode Island 65 Basketball - College Lines (Game) Point Spread (545) Minnesota +6½ Thu@9:00p Final Scores Minnesota 78 Wisconsin 74 Basketball - College Lines (Game) Total (545) Minnesota vs. (546) Wisconsin Over 125 Thu@9:00p Final Scores Minnesota 78 Wisconsin 74 Outcome: Win Risk US$ 15.00 to win US$ 91.74 "

I was under the impression that at xavier -2 I need them to win by 3 or more? am I dead wrong?

also, I had $35 in my account after the 15 to win 91 bet. now I have $90 total. I don't get it.

god i feel dumb/ign'nt. could someone plz 'splain to a betting n00b.

1/16/2009 2:14:03 AM

As with most bets, you can have a push in a parlay,

It significant reduces your payout. So in simple terms, you basically won a two game parlay and were paid as such.

[Edited on January 16, 2009 at 2:42 AM. Reason : PS. You got lucky as fuck. Was gonna hit way under and Minnesota was down big. I took the over too]

1/16/2009 2:42:12 AM

Ah ok, I was thinking it was a straight loss rather than push if that happened. Awesome.

Ha, I know, I was at work and last I checked Minn was down huge, like the whole game. I was mad surprised when I got home.

[Edited on January 16, 2009 at 2:57 AM. Reason : .]

1/16/2009 2:56:42 AM

Cardinals outright.

Still making my mind up about the Steelers/Ravens. I think the Steelers will win but not sure they will cover -6...

1/18/2009 11:43:16 AM

i could see the steelers winning but there is so much value in ravens +6 cause they could win straight up. I think the game will come down to a 2-4 pt finish, making the ravens a solid pick.

1/18/2009 12:50:37 PM

Agreed. I have Ravens at +6, its two high defense teams that know each other pretty well from playing previously in the season.

1/18/2009 2:33:30 PM

Ravens +6 is begging the public to bet on them, which means the big money is on the Steelers. I personally think the Steelers will win by less than 6, but I'm going against that and betting Steelers -6.

1/18/2009 4:39:57 PM

good point

i was listening to a vegas insider on the radio the other day and he stated that the reason why the spread is so large is due to two reasons. The ravens havent had a bye week since week 2 so the public thinks they are exhausted and the fact that since the steelers beat a pretty hot chargers team, the public felt they could do the same vs the ravens

1/18/2009 4:45:06 PM

glad i played small ($10) because the ravens D isnt playing well right now


[Edited on January 18, 2009 at 7:41 PM. Reason : .]

1/18/2009 7:40:34 PM

--

In other news, I can't figure WTF is with the centsports cashout stuff. They said that part of the equation is how long you've been on here, and I've been on a long time, it feels like...

1/18/2009 7:56:44 PM

Yeah that has nothing to do with it. My account is around #1500 and my score was 0 because I hadn't bet in a while. All that it uses how many bets you've made and for how much.

1/18/2009 9:04:53 PM

woot

1/18/2009 10:25:37 PM

Steelers -3

1/18/2009 10:26:22 PM

fuck fuck fuck fuck

Ravens were in the perfect position to get me 240 something with an FG and no more scoring for anyone.

stoopid polamalu [sp]

but I had the Heat SU, so I came out +$2 for the night, lol.

[Edited on January 19, 2009 at 2:13 AM. Reason : .]

1/19/2009 2:12:19 AM

Hit on the Cards +3 but gave it all back on Ravens +6 (fucking Palumlaulaula)

1/19/2009 11:10:06 AM

^^ No fucking shit Bweez. If they Flacco leads them down for the FG I win over $300 and if the bitch didn't run it back for a TD and was stopped and kicked a FG I still would've won around $125. Fuck Polamalu!

1/19/2009 12:19:49 PM

polamu's Td covered for me

1/19/2009 1:43:49 PM

Anyone else think Duke will cover the -19 tonight?

1/20/2009 4:12:22 PM

i was just wondering that

i'm taking the over, and praying that either a) state has a decent game shooting

or b) state turns the ball over so much duke approaches 100 pts.

[Edited on January 20, 2009 at 4:56 PM. Reason : probably b]

1/20/2009 4:56:26 PM

Chicago Bulls minus 4.5 playing the ATL Hawks at home

Vanderbilt Plus 1 playing the Tenn Vols at home

Penn State minus 2 playing Michigan at home

Delaware plus 6.5 playing Drexel at Drexel

and then the one we all are waiting on............

NCSU plus 20 playing Duke AT DUKE bought a half a point to get the 20.

can someone please explain to me if we are getting killed how my dad is always like get on them in the second half? thanks before 8pm tonight!

1/20/2009 6:08:42 PM

some sites offer half time lines


So far I took BC +2.5 & U122 in the OSU/Illinois game.

laid small amounts on both

I am always probably gonna take NCST +20

1/20/2009 7:38:27 PM

the over isn't looking good

1/20/2009 8:25:34 PM

BC +3 was ridiculous, gimme.

now i need tenn and PSU to hang on.

1/20/2009 10:22:49 PM

12 Team Parlay #134160987
Tennis - All tournaments for men (Game) Moneyline
ATP - Australian Open - Melbourne
If either player retires before the match up is completed, all wagers will be settled as no action.
(1220) Gilles Muller -400 Wed@4:30a
Competitor1219) Bernard Tomic
Tennis - All tournaments for men (Game) Moneyline
ATP - Australian Open - Melbourne
If either player retires before the match up is completed, all wagers will be settled as no action.
(1235) Tommy Haas -450 Wed@7:00p
Competitor1236) Flavio Cipolla
Tennis - All tournaments for men (Game) Moneyline
ATP - Australian Open - Melbourne
If either player retires before the match up is completed, all wagers will be settled as no action.
(1244) Nicolas Almagro -330 Wed@7:00p
Competitor1243) Fabio Fognini
Tennis - All tournaments for men (Game) Moneyline
ATP - Australian Open - Melbourne
If either player retires before the match up is completed, all wagers will be settled as no action.
(1246) Mario Ancic -140 Wed@7:00p
Competitor1245) Ivo Karlovic
Tennis - All tournaments for men (Game) Moneyline
ATP - Australian Open - Melbourne
If either player retires before the match up is completed, all wagers will be settled as no action.
(1248) Gilles Simon -550 Wed@7:00p
Competitor1247) Chris Guccione
Tennis - All tournaments for men (Game) Moneyline
ATP - Australian Open - Melbourne
If either player retires before the match up is completed, all wagers will be settled as no action.
(1252) Jurgen Melzer -250 Wed@7:00p
Competitor1251) Andreas Beck
Tennis - All tournaments for men (Game) Moneyline
ATP - Australian Open - Melbourne
If either player retires before the match up is completed, all wagers will be settled as no action.
(1253) Radek Stepanek -750 Wed@7:00p
Competitor1254) Michael Berrer
Tennis - All tournaments for men (Game) Moneyline
ATP - Australian Open - Melbourne
If either player retires before the match up is completed, all wagers will be settled as no action.
(1256) Fernando Verdasco -800 Wed@7:00p
Competitor1255) Arnaud Clement
Tennis - All tournaments for men (Game) Moneyline
ATP - Australian Open - Melbourne
If either player retires before the match up is completed, all wagers will be settled as no action.
(1257) James Blake -2000 Wed@7:00p
Competitor1258) Sebastien de Chaunac
Tennis - All tournaments for men (Game) Moneyline
ATP - Australian Open - Melbourne
If either player retires before the match up is completed, all wagers will be settled as no action.
(1259) Ernests Gulbis -200 Wed@7:00p
Competitor1260) Igor Andreev
Tennis - All tournaments for men (Game) Moneyline
ATP - Australian Open - Melbourne
If either player retires before the match up is completed, all wagers will be settled as no action.
(1261) Dudi Sela -120 Wed@7:00p
Competitor:(1262) Victor Hanescu
Tennis - All tournaments for men (Game) Moneyline
ATP - Australian Open - Melbourne
If either player retires before the match up is completed, all wagers will be settled as no action.
(1264) Jo-Wilfried Tsonga -650 Wed@7:00p
Competitor:(1263) Ivan Ljubicic
Risk US$ 5.00 to win US$ 114.93

1/22/2009 1:33:28 AM

Well on http://www.youwager.com I went from 50 to up to 76 to down to 20 to up 111.00 to back to 13 and then decided to be dumb and play their online casino. needless to say I have no money left.

1/22/2009 2:47:37 AM

haHAHA fuck

I got 11 out of twelve in ^^ right.

1/22/2009 12:38:23 PM

Would you guys take -240 PITT?

1/23/2009 5:45:32 PM

I do think Pitt's gonna run away with it, but I didn't think the Cards were going to beat the Panthers either.

1/23/2009 7:38:04 PM

So apparently Centsports cashout system is based on how well you do and not just how much cash you have. Is that what I'm seeing?

1/24/2009 6:39:36 PM