Quote :

"for ppl who think biological similarity means it makes ppl good canidates for slaves, would it be okay to chop of limbs from an identical twin, or maybe only a few fingers from a little sister since she wouldn't be as smiliar as a twin(or clone)?"

i would not only clone myself in the future to have a ready supply of body parts but i am also a big advocate of stealing organs from poor people in the present

2/24/2006 3:13:32 PM

^^unipride should totally enslave sarah

2/24/2006 4:20:38 PM

i dont get why everyone is talking about twins

i didnt say twins

i said clones

2/24/2006 4:29:42 PM

They're the same thing, that's why everybody's talking about them. Twins are genetic copies. So are clones.

It just happens that twins occur naturally.

2/24/2006 7:09:15 PM

We justify killings animals for food, why not people for parts?

2/24/2006 8:45:38 PM

nah twins are people

clones are just like made in a lab

they are not real people honestly

[Edited on February 24, 2006 at 9:30 PM. Reason : why wouldnt you kill something that isnt real anyway]

2/24/2006 9:29:13 PM

Guess you haven't heard of in vitro fertilization.

2/24/2006 9:30:01 PM

yes i have froshkiller but the only difference is that like a mom has the kid

if someone clones me and was like "can we kill your clone since we dont need nothing but the arm", i would not even hesitate

i mean i allowed them to make it anyway

[Edited on February 24, 2006 at 9:33 PM. Reason : HOW DOES SOMETHING MADE IN A LAB HAVE RIGHTS, IT DIDNT EVEN EXIST BEFORE I SAID SO]

2/24/2006 9:32:00 PM

There are no working artificial wombs, genius. Any human clone created presently would have to be carried to term in utero.

2/24/2006 9:34:57 PM

man i'm not talking about natural birth dude, jesus

2/24/2006 9:35:34 PM

Any genetic copy of an individual created today would be carried to term inside an actual womb and birthed accordingly. That is no different from in vitro fertilization except for the source of the zygote. How is that not a real human being?

2/24/2006 9:39:18 PM

A clone would not technically be a twin, but a twin is technically a clone.

2/24/2006 10:06:48 PM

man wtf froshkiller has some wierd ass definition of a clone

i'm talking about like taking a drop of my blood and creating an arm

that mf's talking about invitro fertilization or some shit

2/24/2006 10:29:59 PM

for once

I agree with FroshKiller

and i would assume most everyone else does too

[Edited on February 24, 2006 at 10:43 PM. Reason : can't type]

2/24/2006 10:33:51 PM

I think there's alot more important global issues to put as much thought in as they have in cloning.

2/24/2006 10:42:59 PM

^^so you say that its wrong to kill a clone

i mean even if it was only created to like give me a liver or something?

[Edited on February 24, 2006 at 10:53 PM. Reason : i mean this isnt like abortion even though i'm pro-choice anyway]

2/24/2006 10:49:51 PM

this is a democracy, the no single person should be able to decide another person's fate.

2/24/2006 10:54:40 PM

Quote :

"ok well with the whole moral issue aside "

you'll never get away from that

human life is valued by humans

if a clone of a human is itself human...then would it have a soul?

if it's not human...what is it?

either way, why should it be property?

Quote :

"i mean even if it was only created to like give me a liver or something?"

what gives you the right to create a human just to use it

would you have a kid just to use its bone marrow or something like that?

[Edited on February 24, 2006 at 10:59 PM. Reason : there's a bunch of movies on this topic]

2/24/2006 10:56:52 PM

i mean i'm all for humans

but damn think of all the possibilities

2/25/2006 1:14:49 AM