padowack Suspended 1255 Posts user info edit post |
And that's why our foreign policy sucks Gamecat.
[Edited on April 19, 2006 at 1:18 AM. Reason : .] 4/19/2006 1:17:40 AM |
ReaderM88 Veteran 103 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | " no i think alot of people voted for him because they hate fags" |
i know this trend has kinda gone towards immigration but i just want to say that yea i know alot of people voted for Bush because of his policy on gay marriage. My own mother, a woman who brought me up to be a hard and true democrat, voted for Bush because of his views on gay marriage and because Kerry wouldn't take a stance.
[Edited on April 24, 2006 at 2:43 PM. Reason : i can']
[Edited on April 24, 2006 at 2:44 PM. Reason : i can't spell at all it seems]4/24/2006 2:33:26 PM |
LoneSnark All American 12317 Posts user info edit post |
^ Yea, Bill Clinton knew what to do there. At some points it seemed he wouldn't stop railing against gay marriage, nevermind that he wasn't even running for office.
Had he been he would have won, if what you say is accurate, which I doubt.
I prefer the economic argument. Bush won because the economy was good. 4/24/2006 2:36:34 PM |
RevoltNow All American 2640 Posts user info edit post |
wtf is up with the gay marriage fight? honestly. who the fuck cares if gays want to be married. other than that crazy baptist from the lounge thread 4/24/2006 5:00:46 PM |
LoneSnark All American 12317 Posts user info edit post |
I wouldn't care if the gays could marry. Hell, it might be a benefit to society. I just wish we could manage to do it correctly: Get the friggin' legislature to pass a law! Judicial/Mayoral activism doesn't help maintain system legitimacy. 4/24/2006 8:24:47 PM |
RevoltNow All American 2640 Posts user info edit post |
i dont understand why this is a matter for the legislature. are gays people? if yes then why should they have to have their rights defined?
(not that i would complain about a law "giving" them rights) 4/24/2006 8:41:32 PM |
LoneSnark All American 12317 Posts user info edit post |
^ Because that is what the legislature is there for, to make laws.
It doesn't say anywhere in the constitution that people have a right to state-sanctioned marriage. As such, the republic granted elements of our government doesn't address this issue. Therefore, it falls to the democratic elements to decide. 4/24/2006 9:23:21 PM |
Demathis1 All American 4364 Posts user info edit post |
we need StillF on this punctuation dawg... 4/24/2006 10:11:34 PM |